The Role of Transverse Occipital Sulcus in Scene Perception and Its Relationship to Object Individuation in Inferior Intraparietal Sulcus

The parietal cortex has been functionally divided into various subregions; however, very little is known about how these areas relate to each other. Two such regions are the transverse occipital sulcus (TOS) scene area and inferior intraparietal sulcus (IPS). TOS exhibits similar activation patterns to the scene selective parahippocampal place area, suggesting its role in scene perception. Inferior IPS, in contrast, has been shown to participate in object individuation and selection via location. Interestingly, both regions have been localized to the same general area of the brain. If these two were actually the same brain region, it would have important implications regarding these regions' role in cognition. To explore this, we first localized TOS and inferior IPS in individual participants and examined the degree of overlap between these regions in each participant. We found that TOS showed only a minor degree of overlap with inferior IPS (∼10%). We then directly explored the role of TOS and inferior IPS in object individuation and scene perception by examining their responses to furnished rooms, empty rooms, isolated furniture, and multiple isolated objects. If TOS and inferior IPS were the same region, we would expect to see similar response patterns in both. Instead, the response of TOS was predominantly scene selective, whereas activity in inferior IPS was primarily driven by the number of objects present in the display, regardless of scene context. These results show that TOS and inferior IPS are nearby but distinct regions, with different functional roles in visual cognition.

[1]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Involved in Perception of Biological Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  Daniel D. Dilks,et al.  Mirror-Image Sensitivity and Invariance in Object and Scene Processing Pathways , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  M. Chun,et al.  Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects , 2006, Nature.

[5]  Yaoda Xu,et al.  Representing connected and disconnected shapes in human inferior intraparietal sulcus , 2008, NeuroImage.

[6]  Carol L Colby,et al.  Active Vision in Parietal and Extrastriate Cortex , 2005, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[7]  Daniel D. Dilks,et al.  The Occipital Place Area Is Causally and Selectively Involved in Scene Perception , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Andrew D. Straw,et al.  Vision Egg: an Open-Source Library for Realtime Visual Stimulus Generation , 2008, Frontiers Neuroinformatics.

[9]  G. Orban,et al.  Comparative mapping of higher visual areas in monkeys and humans , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  E. DeYoe,et al.  Mapping striate and extrastriate visual areas in human cerebral cortex. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  S. Yantis,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of space-based and object-based attentional control , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[12]  S. Dehaene,et al.  THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[13]  Jonathan S. Cant,et al.  Object Ensemble Processing in Human Anterior-Medial Ventral Visual Cortex , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  R. Andersen,et al.  The posterior parietal cortex: Sensorimotor interface for the planning and online control of visually guided movements , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Lotfi B Merabet,et al.  Visual Topography of Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  A. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System , 1999, NeuroImage.

[17]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Automated manifold surgery: constructing geometrically accurate and topologically correct models of the human cerebral cortex , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  B. Wandell,et al.  Visual Field Maps in Human Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[19]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[20]  G. Glover,et al.  Retinotopic organization in human visual cortex and the spatial precision of functional MRI. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  Differential parahippocampal and retrosplenial involvement in three types of visual scene recognition. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Center–periphery organization of human object areas , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Sharon L. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Learning Places from Views: Variation in Scene Processing as a Function of Experience and Navigational Ability , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[25]  J. Culham,et al.  The role of parietal cortex in visuomotor control: What have we learned from neuroimaging? , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Space and attention in parietal cortex. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[27]  M. Sereno,et al.  Mapping of Contralateral Space in Retinotopic Coordinates by a Parietal Cortical Area in Humans , 2001, Science.

[28]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Activity of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area of the monkey during an antisaccade task , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  Visual scene processing in familiar and unfamiliar environments. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  D. Heeger,et al.  Topographic maps of visual spatial attention in human parietal cortex. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[33]  G. Fink,et al.  REVIEW: The functional organization of the intraparietal sulcus in humans and monkeys , 2005, Journal of anatomy.

[34]  D. Heeger,et al.  Topographic organization for delayed saccades in human posterior parietal cortex. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  K. Grill-Spector The neural basis of object perception , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[36]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[37]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[38]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Scene-Selective Cortical Regions in Human and Nonhuman Primates , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Functional analysis of the periphery effect in human building related areas , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[40]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Specific Involvement of Human Parietal Systems and the Amygdala in the Perception of Biological Motion , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Sabine Kastner,et al.  Representation of Eye Movements and Stimulus Motion in Topographically Organized Areas of Human Posterior Parietal Cortex , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  J W Belliveau,et al.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Science.

[43]  Chun-Chia Kung,et al.  Is Region-of-Interest Overlap Comparison a Reliable Measure of Category Specificity? , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Parietal cortex and attention , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[45]  Yaoda Xu,et al.  Distinctive Neural Mechanisms Supporting Visual Object Individuation and Identification , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  Multiple object properties drive scene-selective regions. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[47]  J. Jay Todd,et al.  Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex , 2004, Nature.

[48]  Guy A. Orban,et al.  Mapping the parietal cortex of human and non-human primates , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[49]  A. Oliva,et al.  A Real-World Size Organization of Object Responses in Occipitotemporal Cortex , 2012, Neuron.

[50]  Emily J. Ward,et al.  Eye-centered encoding of visual space in scene-selective regions. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[51]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  Position selectivity in scene- and object-responsive occipitotemporal regions. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  M. Chun,et al.  Selecting and perceiving multiple visual objects , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[53]  T. Schormann,et al.  Functional delineation of the human occipito-temporal areas related to face and scene processing. A PET study. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[54]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Large-Scale Mirror-Symmetry Organization of Human Occipito-Temporal Object Areas , 2003, Neuron.

[55]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[56]  Michael A. Silver,et al.  Spatial attention improves reliability of fMRI retinotopic mapping signals in occipital and parietal cortex , 2010, NeuroImage.

[57]  S. Kastner,et al.  Two hierarchically organized neural systems for object information in human visual cortex , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.