Performance Management in Practice: A Comparative Study of Executive Agencies

This article reports a study of performance management practices in four functions across four European Union member states (Finland, the Netherlands, Sweden, and the United Kingdom). The focus is on how and to what extent performance indicators influenced the top management of the agencies concerned and the degree to which performance data were used by ministries as steering instruments. The research uses a historical institutionalist perspective combined with a model that identifies primary task characteristics as a source of significant variation. Thus the design explores both the influence of task characteristics (through contrasts among the four different functions) and embedded national system characteristics (through contrasts among the four countries). I show that both primary task characteristics and national system characteristics had some of the theoretically predicted effects on the management regimes. Equally, however, certain general tendencies embraced all countries and most functions. These include, first, the incremental growth of more sophisticated performance indicator systems and, second, the feebleness of ministries in developing performance-based strategic steering.

[1]  D. Kettl Government performance: Why management matters; Government matters: Welfare reform in Wisconsin; How management matters: Street‐level bureaucrats and welfare reform , 2006 .

[2]  P. Collins The changing role of government: the reform of public services in developing countries. Richard Batley and George Larbi Palgrave Macmillan, 2004, 280 pp., ISBN 0‐333‐73617‐6 , 2005 .

[3]  Kutsal Yesilkagit Bureaucratic Autonomy, Organizational Culture, and Habituation , 2004 .

[4]  S. Thiel Trends in the Public Sector: Why Politicians Prefer Quasi-Autonomous Organizations , 2004 .

[5]  Nico P. Mol,et al.  Performance Management in Dutch Central Government , 2004 .

[6]  Marc Holzer,et al.  Performance Measurement and Improvement: an Assessment of the State of the Art , 2004 .

[7]  Richard Batley,et al.  The Changing Role of Government , 2004 .

[8]  C. Pollitt,et al.  Agencies: How Governments Do Things Through Semi-Autonomous Organizations , 2004 .

[9]  Christopher Pollitt,et al.  The Essential Public Manager , 2003 .

[10]  C. Pollitt,et al.  Unbundled Government:A critical analysis of the global trend to agencies, quangos & contractualisation , 2003 .

[11]  Hans de Bruijn,et al.  Managing Performance in the Public Sector , 2002 .

[12]  James H. Svara,et al.  Leadership At The Apex: Politicians and Administrators in Western Local Governments , 2002 .

[13]  J. Nilsson,et al.  Does anyone govern? The relationship between the Government Office and the agencies in Sweden , 2002 .

[14]  Christopher Pollitt,et al.  CLARIFYING CONVERGENCE. Striking similarities and durable differences in public management reform , 2001 .

[15]  G. Hofstede Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations , 2001 .

[16]  James L. Perry,et al.  Improving Governance: A New Logic for Empirical Research , 2001 .

[17]  Per Lægreid,et al.  New public management : the transformation of ideas and practice , 2001 .

[18]  G. Vinten Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis , 2000 .

[19]  P. Pierson Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics , 2000, American Political Science Review.

[20]  Donald F. Kettl,et al.  The Global Public Management Revolution: A Report on the Transformation of Governance , 2000 .

[21]  Brian W. Hogwood,et al.  Agencies and Accountability , 2000 .

[22]  W. Kickert,et al.  Public Governance in Europe: A Historical- Institutional Tour D’Horizon , 2000 .

[23]  F. Gains Understanding department - next steps agency relationships. , 1999 .

[24]  D. Lewis Hidden agendas : politics, law and disorder , 1997 .

[25]  R. Kent Weaver,et al.  Do Institutions Matter?: Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad , 1993 .

[26]  J. R. Hook,et al.  Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do And Why They Do It , 1991 .

[27]  Richard Whitley,et al.  The Management Sciences and Managerial Skills , 1988 .

[28]  C. Pollitt BEYOND THE MANAGERIAL MODEL: THE CASE FOR BROADENING PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT IN GOVERNMENT AND THE PUBLIC SERVICES , 1986 .

[29]  G. Amyot,et al.  Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries Arend Lijphart New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984, pp. xv, 229 , 1985, Canadian Journal of Political Science.

[30]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[31]  H. Kaufman The Forest Ranger , 1960 .