DeepMAD: Deep Learning for Magnetic Anomaly Detection and Denoising

In this paper we introduce an end-to-end deep learning (DL) framework for magnetic anomaly detection (MAD) and denoising. This framework consists of two neural networks: a binary classification network for magnetic anomaly detection and a regression network for geomagnetic noise suppression. The two networks work in a cascade mode: the magnetic field measurement is first sent to the detection network to check the existence of the anomaly signal, and then to the denoising network for extracting the signal from the geomagnetic noise if the detection result is positive. The core idea of our proposed method is that the characteristics of both the magnetic anomaly signal and the geomagnetic noise can be learned from massive training data. The experimental results show that: (1) under the same false alarm rate constraint, the probability of detection of our proposed method is above 80% when the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) equals −6 dB, while the orthogonal basis function (OBF) method fails when the SNR is below 0 dB; (2) for geomagnetic noise suppression, an improvement of 10 to 15 dB is achieved for data with input SNRs between −5 and 15 dB. Our results paved the way for data-driven magnetic anomaly detection and denoising.

[1]  Paul Leliak,et al.  Identification and Evaluation of Magnetic-Field Sources of Magnetic Airborne Detector Equipped Aircraft , 1961, IRE Transactions on Aerospace and Navigational Electronics.

[2]  Arie Sheinker,et al.  Magnetic anomaly detection using entropy filter , 2008 .

[3]  J. Heirtzler,et al.  Spatial coherence of geomagnetic rapid variations , 1968 .

[4]  J. T. Weaver Magnetic variations associated with ocean waves and swell , 1965 .

[5]  Arnaud Chulliat,et al.  An International Network of Magnetic Observatories , 2013 .

[6]  Alexei A. Efros,et al.  Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networks , 2016, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[7]  W. H. Pun,et al.  Statistical Decision Theory , 2014 .

[8]  Arie Sheinker,et al.  Processing of a scalar magnetometer signal contaminated by 1/fα noise , 2007 .

[9]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[10]  Arie Sheinker,et al.  Magnetic Anomaly Detection Using High-Order Crossing Method , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Jun Du,et al.  An Experimental Study on Speech Enhancement Based on Deep Neural Networks , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[12]  G. Consolini,et al.  Geomagnetic D st index forecast based on IMF data only , 2006 .

[13]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks , 2010, AISTATS.

[14]  Pascal Vincent,et al.  Stacked Denoising Autoencoders: Learning Useful Representations in a Deep Network with a Local Denoising Criterion , 2010, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[15]  G. González,et al.  Using geomagnetic indices to forecast the next sunspot maximum , 1988 .

[16]  Guangyou Fang,et al.  Adaptive cancellation of geomagnetic background noise for magnetic anomaly detection using coherence , 2014 .

[17]  B. Kaplan,et al.  Magnetic Anomaly Detection Using a Three-Axis Magnetometer , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[18]  Daniel George,et al.  Deep Learning for Real-time Gravitational Wave Detection and Parameter Estimation with Advanced LIGO Data , 2017, ArXiv.

[19]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Magnetic Anomaly Detection Based on Full Connected Neural Network , 2019, IEEE Access.