A fixed energetic ceiling to parental effort in the great tit

1. To elucidate the links between avian brood size, parental effort and parental investment, we measured daily energy expenditure (DEEfem), condition (residuals of mass on tarsus) and feeding rate in female great tits Parus major L. rearing broods in which the number of young was either reduced, unmanipulated or enlarged. 2. Female condition was negatively correlated with manipulation when measured at the nestling age of 8 days (measured during the day), which suggests a shift in allocation from self-feeding to chick-feeding. However, there was no detectable manipulation effect on condition measured at the nestling age of 12 days (measured during the night). Either female condition was only affected by manipulation in the early nestling phase or the females adjusted their diurnal mass trajectory in response to brood size manipulation. More detailed data are required to verify this point. There were no indications of a fitness cost associated with the condition during the day, but condition at night was positively related to winter survival. Since manipulation only affected condition during the day, there was no link between manipulation and winter survival. 3. The duration of the working day was not affected by manipulation and female feeding rate tended to flatten off with manipulated brood size. Similarly, brood reduction resulted in a lower DEEfem, whilst brood enlargement had no effect. This suggests that females worked at an energetic ceiling when rearing an unmanipulated brood. However, the level of this 'ceiling' in DEEfem was not fixed: it differed between years. This leads us to conclude that the observed ceiling was imposed by extrinsic factors (e.g. available foraging time) and not by an intrinsic factor such as maximum energy assimilation rate. We hypothesize that time limitation was the cause for the observed ceiling in energy expenditure and that the annual variation in the level of this ceiling was due to annual variation in ambient temperature. 4. A cost of reproduction was previously demonstrated in this population: brood enlargement caused a reduction in the incidence of second clutches. However, since DEEfem did not differ between control and enlarged broods, we judge it unlikely that daily energy expenditure is a general predictor for parental investment. [KEYWORDS: clutch size; condition; energy expenditure; cost of reproduction; parental effort; Parus major L. Starlings sturnus-vulgaris; kestrel falco-tinnunculus; parus-major; brood size; clutch size; blue tits; food availability; feeding frequency; field metabolism; trade-offs]

[1]  Henrik G. Smith,et al.  Effect of experimentally altered brood size on frequency and timing of second clutches in the great tit , 1987 .

[2]  S. Daan,et al.  Family Planning in the Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) , 1990 .

[3]  S. Daan,et al.  Multiple breeding in the Great Tit. A trade‐off between successive reproductive attempts? , 1997 .

[4]  S. Verhulst,et al.  Seasonal Decline in Reproductive Success of the Great Tit: Variation in Time or Quality? , 1995 .

[5]  R. Pettifor.  Brood-manipulation experiments. II: A cost of reproduction in blue tits (Parus caeruleus)? , 1993 .

[6]  S. Verhulst,et al.  Post-fledging care, multiple breeding and the costs of reproduction in the great tit , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  S. Daan,et al.  Reproductive effort decreases antibody responsiveness , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  S. Daan,et al.  Family Planning in the Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus): The Ultimate Control of Covariation of Laying Date and Clutch Size , 1990 .

[9]  Henrik G. Smith,et al.  Intraspecific variation in migratory pattern of a partial migrant, the blue tit (Parus caeruleus): an evaluation of different hypotheses , 1987 .

[10]  A. J. Noordwijk,et al.  Acquisition and Allocation of Resources: Their Influence on Variation in Life History Tactics , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[11]  R. Norberg.  Temporary Weight Decrease in Breeding Birds May Result in More Fledged Young , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[12]  S. Daan,et al.  Avian basal metabolic rates: their association with body composition and energy expenditure in nature. , 1990, The American journal of physiology.

[13]  A. Kacelnik.  CENTRAL PLACE FORAGING IN STARLINGS (STURNUS-VULGARIS) .1. PATCH RESIDENCE TIME , 1984 .

[14]  Daily energy expenditure during brood rearing of Great Tits Parus major in northern Finland , 1998 .

[15]  A. Kacelnik,et al.  Optimal Foraging and Beyond: How Starlings Cope with Changes in Food Availability , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[16]  Joost M. Tinbergen,et al.  Foraging Decisions in Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris L.) , 1981 .

[17]  J. V. Balen,et al.  A Comparative Sudy of the Breeding Ecology of the Great Tit Parus major in Different Habitats , 2015 .

[18]  S. Daan,et al.  Family Planning in the Great Tit (Parus Major): Optimal Clutch Size as Integration of Parent and Offspring Fitness , 1990 .

[19]  Å. Lindström,et al.  Maximum energy intake rate is proportional to basal metabolic rate in passerine birds , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  J. Diamond,et al.  Maximal sustained energy budgets in humans and animals , 1997, Nature.

[21]  I. Pen,et al.  Parental energy expenditure in relation to manipulated brood size in the European kestrel Falco tinnunculus , 1995 .

[22]  J. Tinbergen,et al.  Parental energy expenditure during brood rearing in the Great Tit (Parus major) in relation to body mass, temperature, food availability and clutch size , 1994 .

[23]  D. Bryant.  Energy expenditure and body mass changes as measures of reproductive costs in birds , 1988 .

[24]  B. Sheldon,et al.  Ecological immunology: costly parasite defences and trade-offs in evolutionary ecology. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  S. Verhulst.  Reproductive decisions in great tits : An optimality approach , 1995 .

[26]  S. Verhulst,et al.  Clutch size and parental effort in the Great Tit Parus major , 1997 .

[27]  J. Diamond,et al.  Sustained metabolic scope. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Bernard Berelson,et al.  Beyond Family Planning , 1969 .

[29]  J. Tinbergen.  Costs of reproduction in the Great Tits : intra seasonal costst associated with brood size , 1987 .

[30]  S. Zohari,et al.  Reproductive effort reduces specific immune response and parasite resistance , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  S. Daan,et al.  Compensation in resting metabolism for experimentally increased activity , 1998, Journal of Comparative Physiology B.

[32]  R. Drent,et al.  The Prudent Parent: Energetic Adjustments in Avian Breeding 1) , 1980 .

[33]  George C. Williams,et al.  Natural Selection, the Costs of Reproduction, and a Refinement of Lack's Principle , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[34]  C. Both,et al.  Quality vs. quantity: energetic and nutritional trade-offs in parental provisioning strategies , 1998 .

[35]  Reproductive trade-off between first and second clutches in the great tit Parus major: an experimental study , 1988 .

[36]  N. Nur.  The consequences of brood size for breeding blue tits , 1984 .

[37]  BROOD SIZE AND THERMAL ENVIRONMENT INFLUENCE FIELD METABOLISM OF NESTLING YELLOW-EYED JUNCOS , 1992 .

[38]  R. Cowie,et al.  Differential response by males and females to brood manipulations in the Pied Flycatcher : Energy expenditure and nestling diet , 1995 .

[39]  W. Karasov,et al.  Nesting energetics of house wrens (Troglodytes aedon) in relation to maximal rates of energy flow , 1993 .

[40]  S. Daan,et al.  Increased daily work precipitates natural death in the kestrel , 1996 .

[41]  Joseph B. Williams,et al.  Field Metabolism and Food Consumption of Savannah Sparrows during the Breeding Season , 1987 .

[42]  Daily Allocation of Time and Energy of Western Bluebirds Feeding Nestlings , 1991 .