Eliciting User Perceptions Using Assessment Tests Based on an Interactive Genetic Algorithm

To avoid failures in the marketplace, the control of the risks in product innovation and the reduction of the innovation cycles require fast and valid assessments from customers. An interactive genetic algorithm (IGA) is proposed for eliciting users' perceptions about the shape of a product, in order to stimulate creativity and to identify design trends. Interactive users' assessment tests are conducted on virtual products to capture and analyze users' responses. The IGA is interfaced with Computer Aided Design (CAD) software (CATIA V5) to create sets of parameterized designs in real time, which are presented iteratively by a graphical interface to the users for evaluation. After a description of the IGA, a study on the convergence of the IGA is presented. The convergence varies, according to the tuning parameters of the algorithm and the size of the design problem. An experiment was carried out with a set of 45 users on the application case, a dashboard, put forward by Renault. The implementation of the perceptive tests and the analysis of the results are described using hierarchical ascendant classification (HAC) and multivariate analysis. This paper shows how the results of tests using IGA can be used to elicit user perception and to detect design trends.

[1]  Hideyuki Takagi,et al.  Acceleration of EC convergence with landscape visualization and human intervention , 2002, Appl. Soft Comput..

[2]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Product semantics and wine portfolio optimisation , 2009 .

[3]  Bruce E. Ankenman,et al.  Optimal experimental design of human appraisals for modeling consumer preferences in engineering design , 2009, DAC 2008.

[4]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Interactive Genetic Algorithms for Use as Creativity Enhancement Tools , 2008, AAAI Spring Symposium: Creative Intelligent Systems.

[5]  Emilie Poirson,et al.  Study of the convergence of Interactive Genetic Algorithm in iterative user's tests: application to car dashboard design , 2010 .

[6]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Learning Stylistic Desires and Generating Preferred Designs of Consumers Using Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithms , 2011, DAC 2011.

[7]  J. Petiot,et al.  Market Share Predictions: A New Model with Rating-Based Conjoint Analysis , 2011 .

[8]  Wei Chen,et al.  An Approach to Decision-Based Design With Discrete Choice Analysis for Demand Modeling , 2003 .

[9]  Keith Case,et al.  Genetic algorithms in computer-aided design , 2000 .

[10]  P. Papalambros,et al.  Optimal hierarchical decomposition synthesis using integer programming , 1997 .

[11]  John H. Frazer,et al.  Capturing aesthetic intention during interactive evolution , 2006, Comput. Aided Des..

[12]  Ashutosh Tiwari,et al.  Integrated qualitativeness in design by multi-objective optimization and interactive evolutionary computation , 2005, 2005 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.

[13]  Wei Chen,et al.  Decision Making in Engineering Design , 2006 .

[14]  Sung-Bae Cho,et al.  Application of interactive genetic algorithm to fashion design , 2000 .

[15]  Kenneth O. Stanley,et al.  Picbreeder: A Case Study in Collaborative Evolutionary Exploration of Design Space , 2011, Evolutionary Computation.

[16]  Jarod C. Kelly,et al.  The Development of a Tool for the Preference Assessment of the Visual Aesthetics of an Object Using Interactive Genetic Algorithms , 2005 .

[17]  Peter H. Bloch.  Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response: , 1995 .

[18]  J. Swait,et al.  The Influence of Task Complexity on Consumer Choice: A Latent Class Model of Decision Strategy Switching , 2001 .

[19]  Bernard Yannou,et al.  Evolutive Design of Car Silhouettes , 2008, DAC 2008.

[20]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Product Semantics: Exploring the Symbolic Qualities of Form , 1984 .

[21]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[22]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  A Survey of Optimization by Building and Using Probabilistic Models , 2002, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[23]  David Ben-Arieh,et al.  Joint Pricing and Platform Configuration in Product Family Design With Genetic Algorithm , 2009 .

[24]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Design preference elicitation, derivative-free optimization and support vector machine search , 2010, DAC 2010.

[25]  Paul E. Green,et al.  A General Approach to Product Design Optimization via Conjoint Analysis , 1981 .

[26]  Shang H. Hsu,et al.  A semantic differential study of designers’ and users’ product form perception , 2000 .

[27]  Wei Chen,et al.  Discrete Choice Demand Modeling for Decision-Based Design , 2005 .

[28]  Hideyuki Takagi,et al.  Interactive evolutionary computation: fusion of the capabilities of EC optimization and human evaluation , 2001, Proc. IEEE.

[29]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Principles of Optimal Design: Modeling and Computation , 1988 .

[30]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  A Design Preference Elicitation Query as an Optimization Process , 2011 .

[31]  John G. Myers,et al.  The Effectiveness of Marketing's “R&D” for Marketing Management: An Assessment , 1979 .

[32]  Mitsuo Nagamachi,et al.  Kansei Engineering: A new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development , 1995 .

[33]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Quantifying Aesthetic Form Preference in a Utility Function , 2009 .

[34]  E. Brunswik,et al.  The Conceptual Framework of Psychology , 1954 .

[35]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Use of shape preference information in product design , 2007 .

[36]  Emilie Poirson,et al.  Interactive user tests to enhance innovation , 2010 .

[37]  Hideki Aoyama,et al.  Basic Study on Trend Prediction for Style Design , 2008 .

[38]  Matthew R. Lewis,et al.  Aesthetic geometry evolution in a generic interactive evolutionary design framework , 2009, New Generation Computing.

[39]  P. Lenk,et al.  Hierarchical Bayes Conjoint Analysis: Recovery of Partworth Heterogeneity from Reduced Experimental Designs , 1996 .

[40]  Jarod C. Kelly,et al.  Interactive genetic algorithms for shape preference assessment in engineering design , 2008 .

[41]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Polyhedral Methods for Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis , 2004 .

[42]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  Beyond conjoint analysis: Advances in preference measurement , 2008 .

[43]  Emilie Poirson,et al.  Detecting Design Trends Using Perceptive Tests Based on an Interactive Genetic Algorithm , 2011 .

[44]  Shapour Azarm,et al.  A Kriging Metamodel Assisted Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm for Design Optimization , 2008 .

[45]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Balancing Marketing and Manufacturing Objectives in Product Line Design , 2006 .

[46]  Shih-Wen Hsiao,et al.  Concurrent design method for developing a new product , 2002 .