Limits of the quasi-induced exposure method when compared with the standard case-control design. Application to the estimation of risks associated with driving under the influence of cannabis or alcohol.

The disparities between the quasi-induced exposure (QIE) method and a standard case-control approach with crash responsibility as disease of interest are studied. The 10,748 drivers who had been given compulsory cannabis and alcohol tests subsequent to involvement in a fatal crash in France between 2001 and 2003 were used to compare the two approaches. Odds ratios were assessed using conditional and unconditional logistic regressions. While both approaches found that drivers under the influence of alcohol or cannabis increased the risk of causing a fatal crash, the two approaches are not equivalent. They differ mainly with regards to the driver sample selected. The QIE method results in splitting the overall road safety issue into two sub-studies: a matched case-control study dealing with two-vehicle crashes and a case-control study dealing with single-vehicle crashes but with a specific control group. Using a specific generic term such as "QIE method" should not hide the real underlying epidemiological design. On the contrary, the standard case-control approach studies drivers involved in all type of crashes whatever the distribution of the responsibility in each crash. This method also known as "responsibility analysis" is the most relevant for assessing the overall road safety implications of a driver characteristic.

[1]  Frank A. Haight,et al.  A CRUDE FRAMEWORK FOR BYPASSING EXPOSURE , 1970 .

[2]  M C Longo,et al.  The prevalence of alcohol, cannabinoids, benzodiazepines and stimulants amongst injured drivers and their role in driver culpability Part I: the prevalence of drug use in drivers, and characteristics of the drug-positive group , 2000 .

[3]  Y. Tsai,et al.  Case-control study of the effectiveness of different types of helmets for the prevention of head injuries among motorcycle riders in Taipei, Taiwan. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.

[4]  P Stamatiadis,et al.  Quasi-induced exposure revisited. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  M. Bédard,et al.  The Impact of Cannabis on Driving , 2007 .

[6]  P. Hamet,et al.  [Exposure to the risk of traffic accidents, a fundamental epidemiological parameter, and one difficult to measure]. , 1991, Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique.

[7]  P. Claret,et al.  Age and sex differences in the risk of causing vehicle collisions in Spain, 1990 to 1999. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  R. McClure,et al.  Quantifying the role of risk-taking behaviour in causation of serious road crash-related injury. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  R. Sims,et al.  Relations among chronic medical conditions, medications, and automobile crashes in the elderly: a population-based case-control study. , 2000, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  Gary A. Davis,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS TO SUPPORT INDUCED EXPOSURE ANALYSES OF TRAFFIC ACCIDENT DATA , 1993 .

[11]  Philip Swann,et al.  The incidence of drugs in drivers killed in Australian road traffic crashes. , 2003, Forensic Science International.

[12]  Michel Bédard,et al.  The impact of cannabis on driving. , 2007, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[13]  J. R. Cuthbert.  An Extension of the Induced Exposure Method of Estimating Driver Risk , 1994 .

[14]  M C Longo,et al.  The prevalence of alcohol, cannabinoids, benzodiazepines and stimulants amongst injured drivers and their role in driver culpability: part ii: the relationship between drug prevalence and drug concentration, and driver culpability. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Mark Asbridge,et al.  Motor vehicle collision risk and driving under the influence of cannabis: evidence from adolescents in Atlantic Canada. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  S Laapotti,et al.  Differences in fatal loss-of-control accidents between young male and female drivers. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  E Lenguerrand,et al.  Modelling the hierarchical structure of road crash data--application to severity analysis. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  Pablo Lardelli-Claret,et al.  Comparison between two quasi-induced exposure methods for studying risk factors for road crashes. , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  Jennie Connor,et al.  The Contribution of Alcohol to Serious Car Crash Injuries , 2004, Epidemiology.

[20]  N Stamatiadis,et al.  Quasi-induced exposure: methodology and insight. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  G. Smith,et al.  The driver's role in fatal two-car crashes: a paired "case-control" study. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[22]  T. Blakely,et al.  Role of cannabis in motor vehicle crashes. , 1999, Epidemiologic reviews.

[23]  R Norton,et al.  The role of driver sleepiness in car crashes: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Lawrence J Cook,et al.  Evaluating the crash and citation rates of Utah drivers licensed with medical conditions, 1992-1996. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  Ezio C. Cerrelli,et al.  Driver exposure: The indirect approach for obtaining relative measures , 1973 .

[26]  Nikiforos Stamatiadis,et al.  Evaluating the impact of passengers on the safety of older drivers. , 2003, Journal of safety research.

[27]  P. Swann,et al.  The involvement of drugs in drivers of motor vehicles killed in Australian road traffic crashes. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  Jean-Louis Martin,et al.  Cannabis intoxication and fatal road crashes in France: population based case-control study , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  Fridulv Sagberg,et al.  Driver health and crash involvement: a case-control study. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[30]  R. F. Borkenstein,et al.  The role of the drinking driver in traffic accidents (the Grand Rapids study) , 1974 .

[31]  M D Robertson,et al.  Responsibility analysis: a methodology to study the effects of drugs in driving. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[32]  J. Ramaekers,et al.  Dose related risk of motor vehicle crashes after cannabis use. , 2004, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[33]  M. Legge,et al.  Age related changes in drivers' crash risk and crash type. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[34]  L Hakamies-Blomqvist,et al.  Older drivers' accident risk: conceptual and methodological issues. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[35]  C Peek-Asa,et al.  Nighttime driving, passenger transport, and injury crash rates of young drivers , 2003, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[36]  Leonard Evans,et al.  Traffic Safety and the Driver , 1991 .

[37]  J D Thorpe,et al.  CALCULATING RELATIVE INVOLVEMENT RATES IN ACCIDENTS WITHOUT DETERMINING EXPOSURE , 1964 .

[38]  Kenneth W. Terhune,et al.  An evaluation of responsibility analysis for assessing alcohol and drug crash effects , 1983 .

[39]  M Hijar,et al.  Risk factors in highway traffic accidents: a case control study. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[40]  J K Wells,et al.  Drugs in fatally injured young male drivers. , 1985, Public health reports.

[41]  Richard W Lyles,et al.  Difficulties with quasi-induced exposure when speed varies systematically by vehicle type. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.