The laser of the future: reality and expectations about the new thulium fiber laser-a systematic review.

The Holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser has been the gold-standard for laser lithotripsy over the last 20 years. However, recent reports about a new prototype thulium fiber laser (TFL) lithotripter have revealed impressive levels of performance. We therefore decided to systematically review the reality and expectations for this new TFL technology. This review was registered in the PROSPERO registry (CRD42019128695). A PubMed search was performed for papers including specific terms relevant to this systematic review published between the years 2015 and 2019, including already accepted but not yet published papers. Additionally, the medical sections of ScienceDirect, Wiley, SpringerLink, Mary Ann Liebert publishers, and Google Scholar were also searched for peer-reviewed abstract presentations. All relevant studies and data identified in the bibliographic search were selected, categorized, and summarized. The authors adhered to PRISMA guidelines for this review. The TFL emits laser radiation at a wavelength of 1,940 nm, and has an optical penetration depth in water about four-times shorter than the Ho:YAG laser. This results in four-times lower stone ablation thresholds, as well as lower tissue ablation thresholds. As the TFL uses electronically-modulated laser diodes, it offers the most comprehensive and flexible range of laser parameters among laser lithotripters, with pulse frequencies up to 2,200 Hz, very low to very high pulse energies (0.005-6 J), short to very long-pulse durations (200 µs up to 12 ms), and a total power level up to 55 W. The stone ablation efficiency is up to four-times that of the Ho:YAG laser for similar laser parameters, with associated implications for speed and operating time. When using dusting settings, the TFL outperforms the Ho:YAG laser in dust quantity and quality, producing much finer particles. Retropulsion is also significantly reduced and sometimes even absent with the TFL. The TFL can use small laser fibers (as small as 50 µm core), with resulting advantages in irrigation, scope deflection, retropulsion reduction, and (in)direct effects on accessibility, visibility, efficiency, and surgical time, as well as offering future miniaturization possibilities. Similar to the Ho:YAG laser, the TFL can also be used for soft tissue applications such as prostate enucleation (ThuFLEP). The TFL machine itself is seven times smaller and eight times lighter than a high-power Ho:YAG laser system, and consumes nine times less energy. Maintenance is expected to be very low due to the durability of its components. The safety profile is also better in many aspects, i.e., for patients, instruments, and surgeons. The advantages of the TFL over the Ho:YAG laser are simply too extensive to be ignored. The TFL appears to be a real alternative to the Ho:YAG laser and become a true game-changer in laser lithotripsy. Due to its novelty, further studies are needed to broaden our understanding of the TFL, and comprehend the full implications and benefits of this new technology, as well its limitations.

[1]  H Schmidt-Kloiber,et al.  Laserinduced shock-wave lithotripsy (LISL). , 1985, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[2]  P. Kallidonis,et al.  Does the Heat Generation by the Thulium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser in the Irrigation Fluid Allow Its Use on the Upper Urinary Tract? An Experimental Study. , 2016, Journal of endourology.

[3]  L. Berthe,et al.  Impact of SuperPulse Thulium Fiber Laser settings and curve diameter on optical fiber fracture during intracorporeal lithotripsy , 2019, European urology. Supplement.

[4]  R. Brinkmann,et al.  Temperature dependence of water absorption for wavelengths at 1920 nm and 1940 nm , 2009 .

[5]  U. Nagele,et al.  EAU guidelines on laser technologies. , 2012, European urology.

[6]  Nathaniel M. Fried,et al.  Thulium fiber laser lithotripsy using tapered fibers , 2010, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[7]  P V Glybochko,et al.  Super-pulse thulium-fiber laser for lithotripsy: First clinical experience in percutaneous nephrolithotomy , 2020 .

[8]  Thomas C. Hutchens,et al.  Fiber optic muzzle brake tip for reducing fiber burnback and stone retropulsion during thulium fiber laser lithotripsy , 2017, Journal of biomedical optics.

[9]  Christopher M. Cilip,et al.  Thulium Fiber Laser Ablation of Urinary Stones Through Small-Core Optical Fibers , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[10]  Christopher R. Wilson,et al.  Miniature ureteroscope distal tip designs for potential use in thulium fiber laser lithotripsy , 2018, Journal of biomedical optics.

[11]  K. Matsuoka,et al.  Holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser for endoscopic lithotripsy. , 1995, Urology.

[12]  Peter Kronenberg,et al.  Advances in Lasers for the Treatment of Stones—a Systematic Review , 2018, Current Urology Reports.

[13]  Evaluation of noise hazard during the holmium laser enucleation of prostate , 2017, BMC Urology.

[14]  Richard L. Blackmon,et al.  Fiber-optic manipulation of urinary stone phantoms using holmium:YAG and thulium fiber lasers , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.

[15]  S. Davies The importance of PROSPERO to the National Institute for Health Research , 2012, Systematic Reviews.

[16]  Luke A. Hardy,et al.  Collateral damage to the ureter and Nitinol stone baskets during thulium fiber laser lithotripsy , 2015, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[17]  MP22-13 BURST LASER LITHOTRIPSY – A NOVEL LITHOTRIPSY MODE , 2016 .

[18]  U. Nagele,et al.  Guidelines on Lasers and Technologies , 2011 .

[19]  Thomas C Hutchens,et al.  Detachable fiber optic tips for use in thulium fiber laser lithotripsy , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.

[20]  W. Krajewski,et al.  The role of lasers in modern urology , 2015, Central European journal of urology.

[21]  Nathaniel M Fried,et al.  Thulium fiber laser ablation of kidney stones using an automated, vibrating fiber , 2019, Journal of biomedical optics.

[22]  G. Preminger,et al.  Effect of Laser Settings and Irrigation Rates on Ureteral Temperature During Holmium Laser Lithotripsy, an In Vitro Model. , 2018, Journal of endourology.

[23]  Nathaniel M Fried,et al.  Thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: An in vitro analysis of stone fragmentation using a modulated 110‐watt Thulium fiber laser at 1.94 µm , 2005, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[24]  Thomas C. Hutchens,et al.  Hollow steel tips for reducing distal fiber burn-back during thulium fiber laser lithotripsy , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.

[25]  H. Razvi,et al.  Preliminary experience with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy. , 1995, Journal of endourology.

[26]  M. Cerruto,et al.  Low-power holmium:YAG laser applications in endourology , 2008 .

[27]  L. Rapoport,et al.  Impact of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate with thulium fiber laser on the erectile function , 2018, BMC Urology.

[28]  R. Leveillee,et al.  Intracorporeal lithotripsy: which modality is best? , 2003, Current opinion in urology.

[29]  Hyun Wook Kang,et al.  Dependence of calculus retropulsion on pulse duration during HO: YAG laser lithotripsy , 2006, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[30]  Nathaniel M. Fried,et al.  Thulium fiber laser ablation of kidney stones using a 50-μm-core silica optical fiber , 2014 .

[31]  A. Martov,et al.  The comparative clinical study of Ho: YAG and SuperPulse Tm fiber laser lithotripters , 2018 .

[32]  J. Isner,et al.  Laser therapy in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. , 1988, British journal of hospital medicine.

[33]  A. A. Bazán,et al.  Tratamiento de la litiasis con láser en condiciones especiales. , 2008 .

[34]  Nathaniel M. Fried,et al.  Rapid Thulium Fiber Laser Lithotripsy at Pulse Rates up to 500 Hz Using a Stone Basket , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[35]  Luke A. Hardy,et al.  Thulium fiber laser lithotripsy in an in vitro ureter model , 2014, Journal of biomedical optics.

[36]  G. Preminger,et al.  Variable Pulse Duration From a New Holmium:YAG Laser: The Effect on Stone Comminution, Fiber Tip Degradation, and Retropulsion in a Dusting Model. , 2017, Urology.

[37]  Ronald Sroka,et al.  In vitro investigations of propulsion during laser lithotripsy using video tracking , 2018, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[38]  A. R. Bordes,et al.  Láser en Urología , 2006 .

[39]  M. Botoca,et al.  Super-pulse thulium fiber versus high power holmium lasers. What about temperature? , 2019, European Urology Supplements.

[40]  Dirk Lange,et al.  Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy: A Review of Dusting vs Fragmentation with Extraction. , 2017, Journal of endourology.

[41]  M. A. Guseinov,et al.  [Initial experience in clinical application of thulium laser contact lithotripsy for transurethral treatment of urolithiasis]. , 2018, Urologiia.

[42]  M. Oz,et al.  Comparison of methods for transcatheter fragmentation of gallstones , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy.

[43]  J. Wickham,et al.  Lasertripsy for ureteric stones in 120 cases: lessons learned. , 1988, British journal of urology.

[44]  W. Roberts,et al.  Thermal Response to High-Power Holmium Laser Lithotripsy. , 2017, Journal of endourology.

[45]  Luke A. Hardy,et al.  Analysis of thulium fiber laser induced bubble dynamics for ablation of kidney stones , 2017, Journal of biophotonics.

[46]  S. Nakada,et al.  In Vitro Comparison of Holmium Lasers: Evidence for Shorter Fragmentation Time and Decreased Retropulsion Using a Modern Variable-pulse Laser. , 2017, Urology.

[47]  F. Montorsi,et al.  Do We Really Need to Wear Proper Eye Protection When Using Holmium:YAG Laser During Endourologic Procedures? Results from an Ex Vivo Animal Model on Pig Eyes. , 2016, Journal of endourology.

[48]  M. Fujisawa,et al.  Does Surgeon Experience Affect Operative Time, Adverse Events and Continence Outcomes in Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate? A Review of More Than 1,000 Cases , 2017, The Journal of urology.

[49]  Hannes Kenngott,et al.  The past, present and future of minimally invasive therapy in urology: A review and speculative outlook , 2013, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[50]  O. Traxer,et al.  1035 Ultra-short, short, medium and long-pulse laser lithotripsy performance , 2016 .

[51]  O. Cussenot,et al.  [The role of the laser in urology]. , 1995, Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie.

[52]  Gereon Hüttmann,et al.  Temperature dependence of light absorption in water at holmium and thulium laser wavelengths. , 2002, Applied optics.

[53]  J. Thompson,et al.  Noise pollution in the operating theatre , 1990, The Lancet.

[54]  J. Teichman,et al.  Holmium: YAG lithotripsy: optimal power settings. , 1999, Journal of endourology.

[55]  Olivier Traxer,et al.  Impact on active scope deflection and irrigation flow of all endoscopic working tools during flexible ureteroscopy. , 2004, European urology.

[56]  Yan-bo Chen,et al.  Comparison of , 2013 .

[57]  R. Hartung,et al.  Use of pulsed Nd:YAG laser in the ureter. , 1988, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[58]  Richard L. Blackmon,et al.  Comparison of holmium:YAG and thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: ablation thresholds, ablation rates, and retropulsion effects. , 2011, Journal of biomedical optics.

[59]  L. Rapoport,et al.  Novel Thulium Fiber Laser for Enucleation of Prostate: A Retrospective Comparison with Open Simple Prostatectomy. , 2019, Journal of endourology.

[60]  M. Gulsoy,et al.  Determining the optimal dose of 1940-nm thulium fiber laser for assisting the endodontic treatment , 2017, Lasers in Medical Science.

[61]  W. C. Adkins,et al.  Consider Ho:YAG for low-cost, effective laser lithotripsy. , 1994, Clinical laser monthly.

[62]  J. W. Segura,et al.  A case of pediatric ureteroscopic lasertripsy. , 1988, The Journal of urology.

[63]  M. Moran,et al.  Evaluation of retropulsion caused by holmium:YAG laser with various power settings and fibers. , 1998, Journal of endourology.

[64]  A J Welch,et al.  Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy: A dominant photothermal ablative mechanism with chemical decomposition of urinary calculi , 1999, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[65]  D. Bagley,et al.  Urologic applications of the holmium laser: preliminary experience. , 1995, Journal of endourology.

[66]  L. Rapoport,et al.  A Randomized Trial Comparing The Learning Curve of 3 Endoscopic Enucleation Techniques (HoLEP, ThuFLEP, and MEP) for BPH Using Mentoring Approach-Initial Results. , 2018, Urology.

[67]  PDD-guided thulium fiber laser en-bloc enucleation of bladder tumor , 2018 .

[68]  Prospective clinical study on superpulse thulium fiber laser: Initial analysis of optimal laser settings , 2019, European Urology Supplements.

[69]  Nathaniel M. Fried,et al.  Recent advances in infrared laser lithotripsy [Invited] , 2018, Biomedical optics express.

[70]  B. Becker,et al.  Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripsy , 2019, Ureteroscopy.

[71]  Luke A. Hardy,et al.  High power holmium:YAG versus thulium fiber laser treatment of kidney stones in dusting mode: ablation rate and fragment size studies , 2019, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[72]  L. Berthe,et al.  Laser Fiber and Flexible Ureterorenoscopy: The Safety Distance Concept. , 2016, Journal of endourology.

[73]  Gregory B. Altshuler,et al.  Optimization of a novel Tm fiber laser lithotripter in terms of stone ablation efficiency and retropulsion reduction , 2018, BiOS.

[74]  Ronald Sroka,et al.  Impact of collateral damage to endourologic tools during laser lithotripsy--in vitro comparison of three different clinical laser systems. , 2011, Journal of endourology.

[75]  R WilsonChristopher,et al.  A miniaturized, 1.9F integrated optical fiber and stone basket for use in thulium fiber laser lithotripsy , 2015 .

[76]  Tarik Emre Sener,et al.  Temperature Changes Inside the Kidney: What Happens During Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminium-Garnet Laser Usage? , 2016, Journal of endourology.

[77]  A. WollinDaniel,et al.  Effect of Laser Settings and Irrigation Rates on Ureteral Temperature During Holmium Laser Lithotripsy, an In Vitro Model. , 2017 .

[78]  Nathaniel M. Fried,et al.  Scanning electron microscopy of real and artificial kidney stones before and after Thulium fiber laser ablation in air and water , 2018, BiOS.

[79]  Olivier Traxer,et al.  Update on lasers in urology 2014: current assessment on holmium:yttrium–aluminum–garnet (Ho:YAG) laser lithotripter settings and laser fibers , 2015, World Journal of Urology.

[80]  Nathaniel M. Fried,et al.  Advances in laser technology and fibre-optic delivery systems in lithotripsy , 2018, Nature Reviews Urology.

[81]  W. Roberts,et al.  Holmium Laser Lithotripsy in the New Stone Age: Dust or Bust? , 2017, Front. Surg..

[82]  O. Traxer,et al.  V1718 LASER FIBERS, PULSE ENERGY AND RETROPULSION - WHAT WE CAN SEE AND WHAT WE CAN'T , 2013 .

[83]  Diedra Gustafson,et al.  Influence of saline on temperature profile of laser lithotripsy activation. , 2015, Journal of endourology.

[84]  A. Gross,et al.  Editorial Comment on: Thermal Response to High-Power Holmium Laser Lithotripsy by Aldoukhi et al. , 2017, Journal of endourology.

[85]  R MolinaWilson,et al.  Influence of saline on temperature profile of laser lithotripsy activation. , 2015 .

[86]  Hong Kong,et al.  Lasers in Urology , 1990, The Bloomsbury Series in Clinical Science.

[87]  O. Traxer,et al.  V03-02 FIRST CLINICAL STUDY ON SUPERPULSE THULIUM FIBER LASER FOR LITHOTRIPSY , 2018 .

[88]  R. Link,et al.  To Dust or Not To Dust: a Systematic Review of Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy Techniques , 2017, Current Urology Reports.

[89]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[90]  K. Khan,et al.  Registration of systematic reviews: PROSPERO , 2012, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[91]  Richard L. Blackmon,et al.  Holmium:YAG (λ = 2,120 nm) versus thulium fiber (λ = 1,908 nm) laser lithotripsy , 2010, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[92]  Luke A. Hardy,et al.  Miniature ball-tip optical fibers for use in thulium fiber laser ablation of kidney stones , 2016, Journal of biomedical optics.

[93]  U. Capitanio,et al.  Which Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Can be Safely Treated with Flexible Ureteroscopy with Holmium:YAG Laser Photoablation? Long‐Term Results from a High Volume Institution , 2017, The Journal of urology.

[94]  Douglas E. Johnson,et al.  Use of the holmium:YAG laser in urology , 1992, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[95]  Olivier Traxer,et al.  Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser , 2019, World Journal of Urology.

[96]  M. Monga,et al.  The Moses holmium system - time is money. , 2018, The Canadian journal of urology.

[97]  T J Flotte,et al.  Co:MgF2 laser ablation of tissue: Effect of wavelength on ablation threshold and thermal damage , 1991, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[98]  Ronald Sroka,et al.  Impact of pulse duration on Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy: treatment aspects on the single-pulse level , 2015, World Journal of Urology.

[99]  O. Traxer,et al.  The truth about laser fiber diameters. , 2013, Urology.

[100]  D. Moher,et al.  Open Medicine endorses PROSPERO , 2011, Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal.

[101]  Luke A. Hardy,et al.  A Miniaturized, 1.9F Integrated Optical Fiber and Stone Basket for Use in Thulium Fiber Laser Lithotripsy. , 2015, Journal of endourology.

[102]  Petr Glybochko,et al.  THULIUM LITHOTRIPSY: FROM EXPERIMENT TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: V11‐11 , 2017 .

[103]  M. Fujisawa,et al.  Current status of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate , 2018, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[104]  P. Lange,et al.  Abstracts from the 37th Congress of the Société Internationale d’Urologie, Centro de Congressos de Lisboa, October 19-22, 2017 , 2017, World Journal of Urology.

[105]  Gregory B. Altshuler,et al.  Comparison between the possibilities of holmium and thulium laser in lithotripsy in vitro , 2017 .

[106]  J. Isner,et al.  Current status of cardiovascular laser therapy, 1987 , 1987 .

[107]  Nathaniel M. Fried,et al.  Fragmentation and dusting of large kidney stones using compact, air-cooled, high peak power, 1940-nm, Thulium fiber laser , 2018, BiOS.

[108]  S. Nakada,et al.  In Vitro Comparison of Stone Fragmentation When Using Various Settings with Modern Variable Pulse Holmium Lasers. , 2017, Journal of endourology.

[109]  Nathaniel M. Fried,et al.  Microscopic analysis of laser-induced proximal fiber tip damage during holmium:YAG and thulium fiber laser lithotripsy , 2016 .

[110]  N. Fried Therapeutic applications of lasers in urology: an update , 2006, Expert review of medical devices.

[111]  Antonio Lauto,et al.  Diode‐pumped fiber lasers: A new clinical tool? , 2002, Lasers in surgery and medicine.