Modeling in the quality by design environment: Regulatory requirements and recommendations for design space and control strategy appointment.

Mathematical models can be used as an integral part of the quality by design (QbD) concept throughout the product lifecycle for variety of purposes, including appointment of the design space and control strategy, continual improvement and risk assessment. Examples of different mathematical modeling techniques (mechanistic, empirical and hybrid) in the pharmaceutical development and process monitoring or control are provided in the presented review. In the QbD context, mathematical models are predominantly used to support design space and/or control strategies. Considering their impact to the final product quality, models can be divided into the following categories: high, medium and low impact models. Although there are regulatory guidelines on the topic of modeling applications, review of QbD-based submission containing modeling elements revealed concerns regarding the scale-dependency of design spaces and verification of models predictions at commercial scale of manufacturing, especially regarding real-time release (RTR) models. Authors provide critical overview on the good modeling practices and introduce concepts of multiple-unit, adaptive and dynamic design space, multivariate specifications and methods for process uncertainty analysis. RTR specification with mathematical model and different approaches to multivariate statistical process control supporting process analytical technologies are also presented.

[1]  Ingmar Nopens,et al.  Uncertainty analysis as essential step in the establishment of the dynamic Design Space of primary drying during freeze-drying. , 2016, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[2]  Johannes Khinast,et al.  Mechanistic modeling of modular co-rotating twin-screw extruders. , 2014, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[3]  Marianthi Ierapetritou,et al.  Near infrared spectroscopic calibration models for real time monitoring of powder density. , 2016, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[4]  Bruno C. Hancock,et al.  Process modeling in the pharmaceutical industry using the discrete element method. , 2009, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[5]  T. De Beer,et al.  Batch statistical process control of a fluid bed granulation process using in-line spatial filter velocimetry and product temperature measurements. , 2011, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[6]  Gabriele Reich,et al.  A quality by design study applied to an industrial pharmaceutical fluid bed granulation. , 2012, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[7]  F. Podczeck,et al.  Theoretical investigations into the influence of the position of a breaking line on the tensile failure of flat, round, bevel-edged tablets using finite element methodology (FEM) and its practical relevance for industrial tablet strength testing. , 2014, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[8]  Roland W. Lewis,et al.  A combined finite‐discrete element method for simulating pharmaceutical powder tableting , 2005 .

[9]  P. Sharma,et al.  Risk management and statistical multivariate analysis approach for design and optimization of satranidazole nanoparticles , 2017, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[10]  Marianthi G. Ierapetritou,et al.  Similarities and Differences Between the Concepts of Operability and Flexibility: The Steady-State Case , 2009 .

[11]  Svetlana Ibrić,et al.  Analysis of fluidized bed granulation process using conventional and novel modeling techniques. , 2011, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[12]  Marianthi G. Ierapetritou,et al.  Design Optimization under Parameter Uncertainty for General Black-Box Models , 2002 .

[13]  Salvador García Muñoz,et al.  Handling uncertainty in the establishment of a design space for the manufacture of a pharmaceutical product , 2010, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[14]  C. Vora,et al.  Risk based approach for design and optimization of stomach specific delivery of rifampicin. , 2013, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[15]  Marianthi G. Ierapetritou,et al.  Challenges and opportunities in modeling pharmaceutical manufacturing processes , 2015, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[16]  Michael W. Laird,et al.  Identification and prevention of antibody disulfide bond reduction during cell culture manufacturing , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[17]  Filippos Kesisoglou The Role of Physiologically Based Oral Absorption Modelling in Formulation Development Under a Quality by Design Paradigm. , 2017, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[18]  Carl-Fredrik Mandenius,et al.  Quality-by-design for biotechnology-related pharmaceuticals. , 2009, Biotechnology journal.

[19]  K. Gernaey,et al.  Good modeling practice for PAT applications: Propagation of input uncertainty and sensitivity analysis , 2009, Biotechnology progress.

[20]  Johannes G Khinast,et al.  An integrated Quality by Design (QbD) approach towards design space definition of a blending unit operation by Discrete Element Method (DEM) simulation. , 2011, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[21]  M. Asadzadeh An Introduction to the Finite Element Method (FEM) for Differential Equations , 2009 .

[22]  J. Rantanen,et al.  The Future of Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Sciences , 2015, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[23]  N. Shastri,et al.  Design and optimization of disintegrating pellets of MCC by non-aqueous extrusion process using statistical tools. , 2016, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[24]  François Bertrand,et al.  Large-scale numerical investigation of solids mixing in a V-blender using the discrete element method , 2008 .

[25]  Ali Hassanpour,et al.  Discrete Element Method (DEM) Simulation of Powder Mixing Process , 2015 .

[26]  Hervé Broly,et al.  Application of the quality by design approach to the drug substance manufacturing process of an Fc fusion protein: towards a global multi-step design space. , 2012, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[27]  Christos Georgakis,et al.  A Model-Free Methodology for the Optimization of Batch Processes: Design of Dynamic Experiments , 2009 .

[28]  Satoshi Toyoshima,et al.  Review Experiences and Regulatory Challenges for Pharmaceutical Development in Japan Using a Quality-by-Design Approach , 2016, Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science.

[29]  Ingmar Nopens,et al.  Model-based analysis of high shear wet granulation from batch to continuous processes in pharmaceutical production--a critical review. , 2013, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[30]  Hai-bin Qu,et al.  In-line monitoring of alcohol precipitation by near-infrared spectroscopy in conjunction with multivariate batch modeling. , 2011, Analytica chimica acta.

[31]  B. H. Ng,et al.  Analysis of particle motion in a paddle mixer using Discrete Element Method (DEM) , 2011 .

[32]  Pierantonio Facco,et al.  Latent variable modeling to assist the implementation of Quality-by-Design paradigms in pharmaceutical development and manufacturing: a review. , 2013, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[33]  Johannes G Khinast,et al.  Mathematical modeling of the coating process. , 2013, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[34]  René Holm,et al.  Q8(R2): Pharmaceutical Development , 2017 .

[35]  I. C. Sinka,et al.  Analysis of tablet compaction. II. Finite element analysis of density distributions in convex tablets. , 2004, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[36]  Bruno C. Hancock,et al.  Investigation of particle packing in model pharmaceutical powders using X-ray microtomography and discrete element method , 2006 .

[37]  Davide Fissore,et al.  In-Line and Off-Line Optimization of Freeze-Drying Cycles for Pharmaceutical Products , 2013 .

[38]  James K. Drennen,et al.  Adaptive Design Space as an Integrated Component of Quality by Design , 2012, Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation.

[39]  Rui Oliveira,et al.  Hybrid modeling as a QbD/PAT tool in process development: an industrial E. coli case study , 2016, Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering.

[40]  Peter York,et al.  Establishing and analyzing the design space in the development of direct compression formulations by gene expression programming. , 2012, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[41]  John Strong Chapter 27 – Scale-up of Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Operations of Solid Dosage Forms , 2009 .

[42]  Fernando J. Muzzio,et al.  Flowsheet models modernize pharmaceutical manufacturing design and risk assessment , 2015 .

[43]  C. Kiparissides,et al.  eposition and fine particle production during dynamic flow n a dry powder inhaler : A CFD approach , 2013 .

[44]  Lilli Møller Andersen,et al.  Quality Risk Management , 2021, Handbook of Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Formulations, Second Edition.

[45]  Igor Skrjanc,et al.  Tableting process optimisation with the application of fuzzy models. , 2010, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[46]  Graham Cook,et al.  Summary of the EMA Joint Regulators/Industry QbD workshop (London, UK; 28–29 January 2014) , 2016, PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

[47]  Fernando J. Muzzio,et al.  A Combined Feed-Forward/Feed-Back Control System for a QbD-Based Continuous Tablet Manufacturing Process , 2015 .

[48]  Huiquan Wu,et al.  Quality-by-design (QbD): an integrated multivariate approach for the component quantification in powder blends. , 2009, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[49]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  An index for operational flexibility in chemical process design. Part I: Formulation and theory , 1985 .

[50]  Niklas Sandler,et al.  Influence of raw material properties upon critical quality attributes of continuously produced granules and tablets. , 2014, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[51]  J. Macgregor,et al.  A Framework for the Development of Design and Control Spaces , 2008, Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation.

[52]  T. De Beer,et al.  Process analytical tools for monitoring, understanding, and control of pharmaceutical fluidized bed granulation: A review. , 2013, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[53]  Ecevit Bilgili,et al.  Modeling of milling processes via DEM, PBM, and microhydrodynamics , 2017 .

[54]  V. D. Dimitriadis,et al.  Flexibility Analysis of Dynamic Systems , 1995 .

[55]  L. Peltonen Design Space and QbD Approach for Production of Drug Nanocrystals by Wet Media Milling Techniques , 2018, Pharmaceutics.

[56]  Marianthi G. Ierapetritou,et al.  Modeling of Particulate Processes for the Continuous Manufacture of Solid-Based Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms , 2013 .

[57]  G. Alefeld,et al.  Introduction to Interval Computation , 1983 .

[58]  Salvador García-Muñoz Establishing multivariate specifications for incoming materials using data from multiple scales , 2009 .

[59]  Sarfaraz K. Niazi Pharmaceutical Quality System , 2009 .

[60]  Wolter J. Fabrycky,et al.  Decision evaluation with interval mathematics: a power distribution system case study , 1994 .

[61]  Cyrus Agarabi,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities for Biotech Quality by Design , 2015 .

[62]  M. Khan,et al.  Quality by design: understanding the formulation variables of a cyclosporine A self-nanoemulsified drug delivery systems by Box-Behnken design and desirability function. , 2007, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[63]  T De Beer,et al.  Identifying overarching excipient properties towards an in-depth understanding of process and product performance for continuous twin-screw wet granulation. , 2017, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[64]  Haibin Qu,et al.  Application of in-line near infrared spectroscopy and multivariate batch modeling for process monitoring in fluid bed granulation. , 2013, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[65]  Michael Glodek,et al.  Process Robustness - A PQRI White Paper , 2006 .

[66]  Barbara Rellahan,et al.  Lessons Learned from Monoclonal Antibody Applications to the Office of Biotechnology Products Quality by Design Pilot Program , 2015 .

[67]  Keisuke Takagaki,et al.  Numerical evaluation of the capping tendency of microcrystalline cellulose tablets during a diametrical compression test. , 2015, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[68]  Marianthi G. Ierapetritou,et al.  Design Space of Pharmaceutical Processes Using Data-Driven-Based Methods , 2010, Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation.

[69]  A. Gaggioli,et al.  Implementing quality by design for biotech products: Are regulators on track? , 2015, mAbs.

[70]  C. W. Gardiner,et al.  Handbook of stochastic methods - for physics, chemistry and the natural sciences, Second Edition , 1986, Springer series in synergetics.

[71]  Huolong Liu,et al.  Two-compartmental population balance modeling of a pulsed spray fluidized bed granulation based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis. , 2014, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[72]  Marianthi G. Ierapetritou,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Modeling and Optimization , 2014 .