Balanced Scorecard in Indian Companies

There has been growing criticism of financial measures in performance evaluation system in postreform India as they are historic in nature and lack futuristic outlook. Their relevance in the information age, when the companies are building internal assets and capabilities, is questioned. The situation may worsen when the firm is compelled to pursue short-term goals at the cost of the organization's long-term objectives. Kaplan and Norton developed an innovative and multi-dimensional corporate performance scorecard known as the Balanced Scorecard. It compels the firm to align its performance measurement and controls from the customers' perspective, internal business processes, and learning and growth perspectives and investigate their impact on the financial indicators. There are arguments that the Balanced Scorecard should be ‘unbalanced’ based on the strategy followed by the firm. The corporate experiences with the implementation of the Balanced Scorecard suggest mixed results. In this article, the authors a) identify the extent of the usage of the Balanced Scorecard by corporate India; b) explore whether Indian firms use all the four perspectives, namely, customer, financial, internal business, and learning and growth in their performance scorecard; c) capture the management motivations for implementation of the Balanced Scorecard; d) identify the key performance indicators in different perspectives of the performance scorecard; and e) evaluate the performance of the Balanced Scorecard as a management tool. The major findings of this study are as follows: The Balanced Scorecard adoption rate is 45.28 per cent in corporate India which compares favourably with 43.90 per cent in the US. The financial perspective has been found to be the most important perspective followed by customers' perspective, shareholders' perspective, internal business perspective, and learning and growth perspective. The environmental, social, and employees' perspectives also figure in it. The expense centre budgets, brand revenue/market share monitoring, profit centre, and transfer pricing mechanism are the other performance management tools used by the Indian companies. Corporate India monitors the indicators as per ISO 14000 norms in the environmental and social perspectives of the performance scorecard. The difficulty in assigning ‘weightage’ to the different perspectives and in ‘establishing cause and effect relationship among these perspectives’ has been found to be the most critical issue in the implementation of the Balanced Scorecard in corporate India. Most companies claimed that the implementation of the Balanced Scorecard has led to the identification of cost reduction opportunities in their organizations which, in turn, has resulted in improvement in the bottom line. Insights from such an analysis can be useful to both management practitioners and management accounting academics.

[1]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Strategy as a field of study: Why search for a new paradigm? , 2007 .

[2]  C. Echeverri Express delivery , 2004, Nature.

[3]  T. Pfeiffer,et al.  A Descriptive Analysis on the Implementation of Balanced Scorecards in German-Speaking Countries , 2003 .

[4]  A. Shenhar,et al.  Beyond the Balanced Scorecard:: Refining the Search for Organizational Success Measures , 2003 .

[5]  B. Peters,et al.  Performance Measurement and Management , 2002 .

[6]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  The balanced scorecard, competitive strategy, and performance , 2002 .

[7]  Rainer Strack,et al.  RAVE™:: Integrated Value Management for Customer, Human, Supplier and Invested Capital , 2002 .

[8]  P. Joshi The international diffusion of new management accounting practices: the case of India , 2001 .

[9]  Darrell Rigby,et al.  Management Tools and Techniques: A Survey , 2001 .

[10]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Having trouble with your strategy? Then map it. , 2000, Harvard business review.

[11]  Karen S. Cravens,et al.  An International Comparison of Strategic Management Accounting Practices , 2000 .

[12]  Hanne Nørreklit The Balance on the Balanced Scorecard: A Critical Analysis of Some of Its Assumptions , 2000 .

[13]  S. Anderson,et al.  Economic transition, strategy and the evolution of management accounting practices: the case of India , 1999 .

[14]  Rodney McAdam,et al.  Taking a critical perspective to the European Business Excellence Model using a balanced scorecard approach: a case study in the service sector , 1999 .

[15]  Nils-Göran Olve,et al.  Performance Drivers: A Practical Guide to Using the Balanced Scorecard , 1999 .

[16]  P. Hepworth,et al.  Weighing it up ‐ a literature review for the balanced scorecard , 1998 .

[17]  E. Ziegel,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard , 1998 .

[18]  Elaine Palmer,et al.  Management by objectives and the Balanced Scorecard: will Rome fall again? , 1998 .

[19]  K. Langfield-Smith,et al.  Adoption and benefits of management accounting practices: an Australian study , 1998 .

[20]  Keith Grint,et al.  TQM, BPR, JIT, BSCs and TLAs: managerial waves or drownings? , 1997 .

[21]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  Strategy-based performance measurement , 1997 .

[22]  Stephen R. Letza,et al.  The design and implementation of the balanced business scorecard , 1996 .

[23]  Michele L. Bechtell Navigating organizational waters with hoshin planning , 1996 .

[24]  Kathleen G. Rust Measuring the costs of quality. , 1995, Hospital cost management and accounting.

[25]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution , 1995 .

[26]  R. Kaplan,et al.  PUTTING THE BALANCED SCORECARD TO WORK , 1993 .

[27]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  CAPABILITIES AND CAPITAL INVESTMENT: NEW PERSPECTIVES ON CAPITAL BUDGETING , 1992 .

[28]  P. Harper,et al.  The case against , 1991, Nature.

[29]  Alfred J. Nanni,et al.  Japanese management accounting practices and the effects of assembly and process automation , 1991 .

[30]  T. H. Kwon,et al.  Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation , 1987 .

[31]  Thomas H. Johnson,et al.  Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting , 1987 .

[32]  H. Schoenfeld The Present State of Performance Evaluation in Multinational Companies , 1986 .

[33]  B. Chakravarthy Measuring strategic performance , 1986 .

[34]  L. Parker Divisional performance measurement: beyond an exclusive profit test , 1979 .

[35]  M. Landau,et al.  To Manage Is Not To Control: Or the Folly of Type II Errors , 1979 .

[36]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[37]  Robert S. Kaplan,et al.  Having Trouble with Your Strategy ? , 2005 .

[38]  P. Williams Practice management. , 2005, The Alpha omegan.

[39]  R. Keith Mobley,et al.  Performance Measurement and Management , 2004 .

[40]  Marshall W. Meyer Rethinking Performance Measurement: From cost drivers to revenue drivers , 2003 .

[41]  Antonio Davila,et al.  Performance Measurement and Control Systems for Implementing Strategy: Text and Cases , 1999 .

[42]  M. Broadbent Measuring business performance , 1999 .

[43]  Charles B. Handy,et al.  Rethinking the Future , 1998, World Economy and International Relations.

[44]  A. Atkinson,et al.  A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Performance Measurement , 1997 .

[45]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system , 1996 .

[46]  D. Norton,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action , 1996 .

[47]  Theodore H. Poister,et al.  MBO in Municipal Government: Variations on a Traditional Management Tool , 1995 .

[48]  Michael D. Akers,et al.  Strategic Planning at Five World-Class Companies , 1995 .

[49]  Colin Drury,et al.  A survey of management accounting practices in UK manufacturing companies , 1993 .

[50]  Kenneth A. Merchant,et al.  Readings in accounting for management control , 1992 .

[51]  G. Stewart The Quest for Value: A Guide for Senior Managers , 1991 .

[52]  A. Rappaport,et al.  Creating shareholder value : the new standard for business performance , 1986 .

[53]  Robert S. Kaplan,et al.  The evolution of management accounting , 1984 .

[54]  Ben S. Branch Cash Flow Analysis: More Important Than Ever , 1981 .

[55]  A. Hopwood An Empirical Study of the Role of Accounting Data in Performance Evaluation , 1972 .

[56]  J Dearden,et al.  CASE AGAINST ROI CONTROL , 1969 .

[57]  D. McGregor,et al.  The human side of enterprise, New York (McGraw-Hill Book Company) 1960. , 1960 .