The Evolving Face of Ethics in Technical and Professional Communication: Challenger to Columbia

Our view of ethics in professional and technical communication has evolved, paralleling developments throughout society. Earlier views on ethics and values have grown into a broad perspective of complex gradations with people at many levels affecting eventual practical outcomes. This newer perspective includes not only persons but social forces and organizations. The organizational culture of NASA, for example, was specifically identified by the Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) as one of the causes of faulty communication leading to a terribly tragic event. The Challenger investigations of 20 years earlier, on the other hand, focused primarily on physical events, secondarily on professional judgments, and only little on the social and cultural context of the disaster. We learn by failures but also by self-examination. As we see how ethics and values impact technical events, we understand that technological progress is ultimately a human endeavor in which reflection and judgment is as important as measurement and observation.

[1]  Patrick Moore.  Questioning the Motives of Technical Communication and Rhetoric: Steven Katz's “Ethic of Expediency” , 2004 .

[2]  Robert R. Johnson,et al.  User-Centered Technology: A Rhetorical Theory for Computers and Other Mundane Artifacts , 1998 .

[3]  Paul M. Dombrowski.  Can ethics be technologized? Lessons from Challenger, philosophy, and rhetoric , 1995 .

[4]  S. Katz,et al.  The Ethic of Expediency: Classical Rhetoric, Technology, and the Holocaust , 1992 .

[5]  Carol David,et al.  After Enron , 2003 .

[6]  Denise Tillery.  Power, Language, and Professional Choices: A Hermeneutic Approach to Teaching Technical Communication , 2001 .

[7]  K. Durack.  Authority and Audience-Centered Writing Strategies: Sexism in 19th-Century Sewing Machine Manuals. , 1998 .

[8]  I. Thompson,et al.  Women and Feminism in Technical Communication—An Update , 2006 .

[9]  P. Dombrowski.  Ethics in technical communication , 2000 .

[10]  P. Dombrowski.  Ethics and Technical Communication: The Past Quarter Century , 2000 .

[11]  Mark Garrett Longaker,et al.  Beyond Ethics , 2005 .

[12]  Joy Bill,et al.  Why the future doesn’t need us , 2003 .

[13]  A. Jennings.  Employed students: ethical and legal issues in the technical communication classroom , 2000 .

[14]  Dorothy A. Winsor,et al.  The Construction of Knowledge in Organizations: Asking the Right Questions about the Challenger , 1990 .

[15]  Susan J. Harrington,et al.  Telecommuting: a test of trust, competing values, and relative advantage , 1999 .

[16]  S. Dragga.  Guest Editor's Column , 2001 .

[18]  Crisis communication put to the test: the case of two airlines on 9/11 , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[19]  Paul M. Dombrowski.  Humanistic Aspects of Technical Communication , 1994 .

[20]  Mary M. Lay,et al.  Collaborative Writing in Industry: Investigations in Theory and Practice , 1991 .

[21]  M. E. Cochran.  "Cynical Politics" versus "Scientific Truth:" communication crisis at Brookhaven National Lab , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[22]  M. Killingsworth.  From Environmental Rhetoric to Ecocomposition and Ecopoetics: Finding a Place for Professional Communication , 2005 .

[23]  Sam Dragga.  "Is This Ethical?" A Survey of Opinion on Principles and Practices of Document Design. , 1996 .

[24]  A. Tomlinson.  POWER , 1998, The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Imperialism and Anti-Imperialism.

[25]  B. Sauer.  Sense and Sensibility in Technical Documentation , 1993 .

[26]  Craig Waddell.  Defining sustainable development: A case study in environmental communication , 1995 .

[27]  M. Markel.  Safe harbor and privacy protection: a looming issue for IT professionals , 2006 .

[28]  Isabelle Thompson.  Women and Feminism in Technical Communication , 1999 .

[29]  D. Kienzler.  Ethics, Critical Thinking, and Professional Communication Pedagogy , 2001 .

[30]  R. Rosenfeld,et al.  Ethics , 2008 .

[31]  Using criteria in the recommendation report: a case study of the Texas A&M university bonfire commission findings , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[32]  Candace Spigelman,et al.  Why We Chose Rhetoric , 2006 .

[33]  Dan Voss,et al.  Ethics in Technical Communication: Shades of Gray , 1997 .

[34]  Guest Editorial: A Response to Patrick Moore's “Questioning the Motives of Technical Communication and Rhetoric: Steven Katz's ‘Ethic of Expediency’” , 2006 .

[35]  J. B. Johnson,et al.  National Endowment for the Humanities , 2001 .

[36]  C. Williams.  Intel's Pentium chip crisis: an ethical analysis , 1997 .

[37]  Deborah G. Johnson,et al.  Ethical Issues in Engineering , 1990 .

[38]  A. J. Grimes.  Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies , 1985 .

[39]  Michael J. Salvo,et al.  Ethics of Engagement: User-Centered Design and Rhetorical Methodology , 2001 .

[40]  Lee A. Freeman,et al.  Information ethics: privacy and intellectual property , 2004 .

[41]  J. E. Porter.  Rhetorical ethics and internetworked writing , 1998 .

[42]  The lessons of the Challenger investigations , 1991 .

[43]  Teaching the air midwest case: a stakeholder approach to deliberative technical rhetoric , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[44]  Sam Dragga,et al.  The Inhumanity of Technical Illustrations , 2001 .

[45]  The Two Shuttle Accident Reports: Context and Culture in Technical Communication , 2006 .

[46]  J. Gould.  Directions in Technical Writing and Communication , 1971 .

[47]  Intuitive ethics: Understanding and critiquing the role of intuition in ethical decisions , 1999 .

[48]  C. David.  Investitures of Power: Portraits of Professional Women , 2001 .

[49]  C. Nelson-Burns.  The Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant eroded reactor head: a case study , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[50]  R. House,et al.  Teaching Enron: the rhetoric and ethics of whistle-blowing , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[51]  Dale L. Sullivan,et al.  Habit Formation and Story Telling: A Theory for Guiding Ethical Action , 2001 .

[52]  T. Chambers.  A Peircian approach to professional ethics instruction , 2002 .