The effects of authentic audience on English as a second language (ESL) writers: a task-based, computer-mediated approach

The majority of writing tasks assigned to second language (L2) learners tend to target an abstract audience and the writing generated is not meant for real or meaningful purposes. The emergence of Web 2.0 concepts has created a potential educational environment where students have access to a widely distributed, authentic audience with a simple click of the mouse. This study examines the impact that targeting an authentic audience within a task-based, computer-mediated environment may have on L2 learner motivation toward English as a second language (ESL) writing. Student perceptions on progress in writing and on motivation to improve their writing were assessed through a semi-structured interview, triangulated with student web-based project work and participant observation. Analysis of interview data reveals that students were motivated to focus on sentence complexity and variety and engaged in the autonomous learning of vocabulary in an effort to communicate information they perceived to be important. The qualitative results also indicate that the participants' awareness of audience and sense of ownership were raised through engagement in this task-based, computer-mediated approach.

[1]  Zoltán Dörnyei,et al.  7. The motivational basis of language learning tasks , 2002 .

[2]  Rebecca L. Strange,et al.  Audience Awareness: When and How Does It Develop? ERIC Digest Number 4. , 1988 .

[3]  Trena M. Paulus,et al.  The Effect of Peer and Teacher Feedback on Student Writing , 1999 .

[4]  Dafne González,et al.  TEACHING AND LEARNING THROUGH CHAT: A TAXONOMY OF EDUCATIONAL CHAT FOR EFL/ESL , 2003 .

[5]  Robert Hoffman.  Powerful, personal: electronic mail and the L2 writing process , 1994 .

[6]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Motivational aspects of using computers for writing and communication , 1996 .

[7]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  AUDIENCE, AUTHORSHIP, AND ARTIFACT: THE EMERGENT SEMIOTICS OF WEB 2.0 , 2007, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[8]  Jessie Choi.  The Role of Online Collaboration in Promoting ESL Writing. , 2008 .

[9]  C. Chapelle.  Interactionist SLA Theory in CALL Research , 2006 .

[10]  Paula M. Winke,et al.  THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE LANGUAGE LEARNER: INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[11]  P. Skehan.  Focus on Form, Tasks, and Technology , 2003 .

[12]  Paula Kalaja,et al.  Experimenting with Computer Conferencing in English for Academic Purposes. , 1995 .

[13]  Klaus Schwienhorst,et al.  Learner Autonomy and Tandem Learning: Putting Principles Into Practice in Synchronous and Asynchronous Telecommunications Environments , 2003 .

[14]  Jeong-Bae Son,et al.  Learner experiences in web-based language learning , 2007 .

[15]  Yu-mei Wang.  Email Dialogue Journaling in an English as a Second Language (ESL) Reading and Writing Classroom , 1998 .

[16]  Limited R. Ellis,et al.  Instructed Second Language Acquisition A Literature Review , 2005 .

[17]  Joel Bloch,et al.  ABDULLAH'S BLOGGING: A GENERATION 1.5 STUDENT ENTERS THE BLOGOSPHERE , 2007 .

[18]  Marõ ´ a,et al.  Is SLA Interactionist Theory Relevant to CALL? A Study on the Effects of Computer-Mediated Interaction in L2 Vocabulary Acquisition , 2003 .

[19]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[20]  John S. Hedgcock,et al.  Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing , 1994 .

[21]  Huw Jarvis,et al.  Technology and change in English language teaching (ELT) , 2005 .

[22]  M. Warschauer.  Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice. , 1997 .

[23]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Computer Learning Networks and Student Empowerment. , 1996 .

[24]  R. J. Repique.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2013, Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association.

[25]  Zoltan Dornyei,et al.  The motivational basis of language learning tasks * , 2007 .

[26]  Z. Dörnyei.  Attitudes, Orientations, and Motivations in Language Learning: Advances in Theory, Research, and Applications , 2003 .

[27]  Michael H. Long,et al.  OPTIMAL PSYCHOLINGUISTIC ENVIRONMENTS FOR DISTANCE FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING , 2003 .

[28]  Hui-Fang Shang.  An exploratory study of e-mail application on FL writing performance , 2007 .

[29]  A. Tsui,et al.  Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments , 2000 .

[30]  Antonie Alm,et al.  CALL for autonomy, competency and relatedness: Motivating language learning environments in Web 2.0 , 2006, The JALT CALL Journal.

[31]  Jane Willis,et al.  A Framework for Task-Based Learning , 1996 .

[32]  Paul Rollinson,et al.  Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class , 2005 .

[33]  Josef Hellebrandt,et al.  Virtual Collaborations in the Spanish Class: From E-Mail to Web Design and CD-Rom Development , 1999 .

[34]  R. Ellis.  Task-based research and language pedagogy , 2000 .

[35]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[36]  Manuela González-Bueno,et al.  Electronic Mail in Foreign Language Writing: A Study of Grammatical and Lexical Accuracy, and Quantity of Language , 2000 .

[37]  E. Deci,et al.  The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior , 2000 .

[38]  Mark Peterson,et al.  Learner interaction management in an avatar and chat-based virtual world , 2006 .

[39]  Heesook Cheon,et al.  Title: The Viability of Computer Mediated Communication in the Korean Secondary EFL Classroom. , 2003 .