Effect of treatment media on the agglomeration of titanium dioxide nanoparticles: impact on genotoxicity, cellular interaction, and cell cycle.

The widespread use of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles in consumer products increases the probability of exposure to humans and the environment. Although TiO2 nanoparticles have been shown to induce DNA damage (comet assay) and chromosome damage (micronucleus assay, MN) in vitro, no study has systematically assessed the influence of medium composition on the physicochemical characteristics and genotoxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles. We assessed TiO2 nanoparticle agglomeration, cellular interaction, induction of genotoxicity, and influence on cell cycle in human lung epithelial cells using three different nanoparticle-treatment media: keratinocyte growth medium (KGM) plus 0.1% bovine serum albumin (KB); a synthetic broncheoalveolar lavage fluid containing PBS, 0.6% bovine serum albumin and 0.001% surfactant (DM); or KGM with 10% fetal bovine serum (KF). The comet assay showed that TiO2 nanoparticles induced similar amounts of DNA damage in all three media, independent of the amount of agglomeration, cellular interaction, or cell-cycle changes measured by flow cytometry. In contrast, TiO2 nanoparticles induced MN only in KF, which is the medium that facilitated the lowest amount of agglomeration, the greatest amount of nanoparticle cellular interaction, and the highest population of cells accumulating in S phase. These results with TiO2 nanoparticles in KF demonstrate an association between medium composition, particle uptake, and nanoparticle interaction with cells, leading to chromosomal damage as measured by the MN assay.

[1]  B. Sanderson,et al.  Cyto- and genotoxicity of ultrafine TiO2 particles in cultured human lymphoblastoid cells. , 2007, Mutation research.

[2]  Younan Xia,et al.  Dark-field microscopy studies of single metal nanoparticles: understanding the factors that influence the linewidth of the localized surface plasmon resonance. , 2008, Journal of materials chemistry.

[3]  W. Cao,et al.  Localized surface plasmon resonance of single silver nanoparticles studied by dark-field optical microscopy and spectroscopy. , 2011, Journal of applied physics.

[4]  T. Xia,et al.  Toxic Potential of Materials at the Nanolevel , 2006, Science.

[5]  Robert M Zucker,et al.  In vitro phototoxicity and hazard identification of nano-scale titanium dioxide. , 2012, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[6]  M. Fenech The in vitro micronucleus technique. , 2000, Mutation research.

[7]  S. K. Sundaram,et al.  Adsorbed proteins influence the biological activity and molecular targeting of nanomaterials. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[8]  Y. Ibuki,et al.  Simple and easy method to evaluate uptake potential of nanoparticles in mammalian cells using a flow cytometric light scatter analysis. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  John D. Potter,et al.  Flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle phase specificity of DNA damage induced by radiation, hydrogen peroxide and doxorubicin. , 2002, Carcinogenesis.

[10]  Laetitia Gonzalez,et al.  Genotoxicity of engineered nanomaterials: A critical review , 2008 .

[11]  K. Kitchin,et al.  Oxidative stress studies of six TiO2 and two CeO2 nanomaterials: Immuno-spin trapping results with DNA , 2011, Nanotoxicology.

[12]  R. Amal,et al.  Effects of serum adsorption on cellular uptake profile and consequent impact of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on human lung cell lines. , 2012, ACS nano.

[13]  H. Shapiro Optical measurements in cytometry: light scattering, extinction, absorption, and fluorescence. , 2001, Methods in cell biology.

[14]  I. Iavicoli,et al.  Toxicological effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles: a review of in vitro mammalian studies. , 2011, European review for medical and pharmacological sciences.

[15]  H. Lindberg,et al.  Genotoxicity of inhaled nanosized TiO(2) in mice. , 2012, Mutation research.

[16]  H. Krug,et al.  Oops they did it again! Carbon nanotubes hoax scientists in viability assays. , 2006, Nano letters.

[17]  S. Doak,et al.  NanoGenotoxicology: the DNA damaging potential of engineered nanomaterials. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[18]  Kathleen Wallace,et al.  Proteome profiling reveals potential toxicity and detoxification pathways following exposure of BEAS‐2B cells to engineered nanoparticle titanium dioxide , 2011, Proteomics.

[19]  Robert H Schiestl,et al.  Titanium dioxide nanoparticles induce DNA damage and genetic instability in vivo in mice. , 2009, Cancer research.

[20]  Antonio Marcomini,et al.  Influence of serum on in situ proliferation and genotoxicity in A549 human lung cells exposed to nanomaterials. , 2012, Mutation research.

[21]  T. Webb,et al.  Pulmonary toxicity study in rats with three forms of ultrafine-TiO2 particles: differential responses related to surface properties. , 2007, Toxicology.

[22]  Nancy A. Monteiro-Riviere,et al.  Challenges for assessing carbon nanomaterial toxicity to the skin , 2006 .

[23]  D. Warheit,et al.  Characterization of nanomaterials for toxicity assessment. , 2009, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology.

[24]  Ralf Kriehuber,et al.  Oxidative stress-induced cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of nano-sized titanium dioxide particles in human HaCaT keratinocytes. , 2012, Toxicology.

[25]  Vincent Castranova,et al.  Improved method to disperse nanoparticles for in vitro and in vivo investigation of toxicity , 2007 .

[26]  Vicki Stone,et al.  Identification of the mechanisms that drive the toxicity of TiO2 particulates: the contribution of physicochemical characteristics , 2009, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[27]  T. Xia,et al.  Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. , 2009, Nature materials.

[28]  S. Hackenberg,et al.  Nanosized titanium dioxide particles do not induce DNA damage in human peripheral blood lymphocytes , 2011, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[29]  Darren J. Martin,et al.  Differential plasma protein binding to metal oxide nanoparticles , 2009, Nanotechnology.

[30]  Tung-Sheng Shih,et al.  Disturbed mitotic progression and genome segregation are involved in cell transformation mediated by nano-TiO2 long-term exposure. , 2009, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[31]  Arezou A Ghazani,et al.  Assessing the effect of surface chemistry on gold nanorod uptake, toxicity, and gene expression in mammalian cells. , 2008, Small.

[32]  R. Zucker Flow Cytometry Quality Assurance , 2008 .

[33]  B. Brehm-Stecher,et al.  Enhanced dark field microscopy for rapid artifact‐free detection of nanoparticle binding to Candida albicans cells and hyphae , 2009, Biotechnology journal.

[34]  Katsuhide Fujita,et al.  Protein adsorption of ultrafine metal oxide and its influence on cytotoxicity toward cultured cells. , 2009, Chemical research in toxicology.

[35]  Lang Tran,et al.  Safe handling of nanotechnology , 2006, Nature.

[36]  H. Byrne,et al.  In vitro toxicity evaluation of single walled carbon nanotubes on human A549 lung cells. , 2007, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[37]  Ken Donaldson,et al.  Possible genotoxic mechanisms of nanoparticles: Criteria for improved test strategies , 2010, Nanotoxicology.

[38]  Lang Tran,et al.  Evaluating the uptake and intracellular fate of polystyrene nanoparticles by primary and hepatocyte cell lines in vitro. , 2010, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[39]  Stefan Tenzer,et al.  Nanoparticle size is a critical physicochemical determinant of the human blood plasma corona: a comprehensive quantitative proteomic analysis. , 2011, ACS nano.

[40]  P. Rabinovitch,et al.  The cell cycle phases of DNA damage and repair initiated by topoisomerase II-targeting chemotherapeutic drugs. , 2005, Mutation research.

[41]  W. Stark,et al.  The degree and kind of agglomeration affect carbon nanotube cytotoxicity. , 2007, Toxicology letters.

[42]  K. Jan,et al.  Ultrafine titanium dioxide particles in the absence of photoactivation can induce oxidative damage to human bronchial epithelial cells. , 2005, Toxicology.

[43]  Jeffrey I. Zink,et al.  Dispersion and stability optimization of TiO2 nanoparticles in cell culture media. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[44]  R. Xu,et al.  Particle size and zeta potential of carbon black in liquid media , 2007 .

[45]  David M. Brown,et al.  Measurement of reactive species production by nanoparticles prepared in biologically relevant media. , 2007, Toxicology letters.

[46]  R. Zucker,et al.  Detection of TiO2 nanoparticles in cells by flow cytometry. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[47]  Vincent Castranova,et al.  A biocompatible medium for nanoparticle dispersion , 2008 .

[48]  Su Jin Kang,et al.  Titanium dioxide nanoparticles trigger p53‐mediated damage response in peripheral blood lymphocytes , 2008, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[49]  Kenneth A. Dawson,et al.  Nanoparticle size and surface properties determine the protein corona with possible implications for biological impacts , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  P. M. Williams,et al.  Confounding experimental considerations in nanogenotoxicology. , 2009, Mutagenesis.

[51]  Qamar Rahman,et al.  Evidence that ultrafine titanium dioxide induces micronuclei and apoptosis in Syrian hamster embryo fibroblasts. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[52]  H. Lindberg,et al.  Genotoxic effects of nanosized and fine TiO2 , 2009, Human & experimental toxicology.

[53]  R. Zucker,et al.  Microscopy imaging methods for the detection of silver and titanium nanoparticles within cells. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[54]  S. Ellard,et al.  A modified protocol for the cytochalasin B in vitro micronucleus assay using whole human blood or separated lymphocyte cultures. , 1993, Mutagenesis.

[55]  S. Hackenberg,et al.  Intracellular distribution, geno- and cytotoxic effects of nanosized titanium dioxide particles in the anatase crystal phase on human nasal mucosa cells. , 2010, Toxicology letters.

[56]  M. Fenech,et al.  Report from the In Vitro Micronucleus Assay Working Group , 2003, Mutation research.

[57]  Peter Wick,et al.  The reliability and limits of the MTT reduction assay for carbon nanotubes-cell interaction , 2007 .

[58]  Iseult Lynch,et al.  Physical-chemical aspects of protein corona: relevance to in vitro and in vivo biological impacts of nanoparticles. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[59]  Helinor Johnston,et al.  Development of in vitro systems for nanotoxicology: methodological considerations , 2009, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[60]  H. J. Phillips Dye Exclusion Tests for Cell Viability , 1973 .

[61]  E. Dopp,et al.  Titanium dioxide nanoparticles induce oxidative stress and DNA-adduct formation but not DNA-breakage in human lung cells , 2009, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[62]  H. Byrne,et al.  Spectroscopic analysis confirms the interactions between single walled carbon nanotubes and various dyes commonly used to assess cytotoxicity , 2007 .

[63]  R. Amal,et al.  Effect of TiO2 nanoparticle surface functionalization on protein adsorption, cellular uptake and cytotoxicity: the attachment of PEG comb polymers using catalytic chain transfer and thiol–ene chemistry , 2012 .

[64]  T. Paunesku,et al.  Endocytosis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in prostate cancer PC-3M cells. , 2011, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[65]  Robert H. Hurt,et al.  Toxicology of carbon nanomaterials: Status, trends, and perspectives on the special issue , 2006 .

[66]  Roberto Cingolani,et al.  Effects of cell culture media on the dynamic formation of protein-nanoparticle complexes and influence on the cellular response. , 2010, ACS nano.

[67]  F. Nesslany,et al.  Study of serum interaction with a cationic nanoparticle: Implications for in vitro endocytosis, cytotoxicity and genotoxicity. , 2012, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[68]  R R Tice,et al.  A microgel electrophoresis technique for the direct quantitation of DNA damage and repair in individual fibroblasts cultured on microscope slides. , 1991, Mutation research.

[69]  Jie Wu,et al.  Involvement of JNK and P53 activation in G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induced by titanium dioxide nanoparticles in neuron cells. , 2010, Toxicology letters.

[70]  Awadhesh N Jha,et al.  Hydroxyl radicals (*OH) are associated with titanium dioxide (TiO(2)) nanoparticle-induced cytotoxicity and oxidative DNA damage in fish cells. , 2008, Mutation research.