Incentive theory: II. Models for choice.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] E Fantino,et al. Effects of reinforcer duration on responding in two-link chained interval schedules. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[2] P. Killeen. Preference for fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[3] H Rachlin,et al. Commitment, choice and self-control. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[4] R. W. Richards,et al. Preference for signaled versus unsignaled reinforcement delay in concurrent-chain schedules. , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[5] E Fantino,et al. Uncertainty reduction, conditioned reinforcement, and observing. , 1980, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[6] G S REYNOLDS,et al. Potency of Conditioned Reinforcers Based on Food and on Food and Punishment , 1963, Science.
[7] L Green,et al. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Choice between Rewards Differing in Amount and Delay: toward a Choice Model of Self Control , 2022 .
[8] E. Fantino,et al. Effects on choice of reinforcement delay and conditioned reinforcement. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[9] A. Tomie,et al. The retarding effect of the TRC response-elimination procedure upon the subsequent reacquisition of autoshaping: Comparison of between- and within-subjects assessment procedures and the evaluation of the role of background contextual stimuli , 1981 .
[10] L. Green,et al. Preference reversal and self control: choice as a function of reward amount and delay , 1981 .
[11] J W Donahoe,et al. Some implications of a relational principle of reinforcement. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[12] E. Fantino. Choice and rate of reinforcement. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[13] Edmund Fantino,et al. THE PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTANCE TO REWARD1 , 1972 .
[14] E. Hearst,et al. Bridging temporal gaps between CS and US in autoshaping: insertion of other stimuli before, during, and after CS. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[15] E Fantino,et al. Preference for mixed- versus fixed-ratio schedules. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[16] Carl D. Cheney,et al. Observing Behavior and Information , 1980 .
[17] J. C. McMillan,et al. Average uncertainty as a determinant of observing behavior. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[18] J Moore,et al. Choice and number of reinforcers. , 1979, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[19] A C Catania,et al. Preference for free choice over forced choice in pigeons. , 1980, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[20] Edmund Fantino,et al. CHOICE FOR PERIODIC SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT1 , 1970 .
[21] E Fantino,et al. An appraisal of preference for multiple versus mixed schedules. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[22] G. Ainslie. Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. , 1975, Psychological bulletin.
[23] J D Findley,et al. Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling. , 1958, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[24] Masato Ito,et al. Choice behavior of rats in a concurrent-chains schedule: Amount and delay of reinforcement. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[25] J. Staddon,et al. The "supersitition" experiment: A reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior. , 1971 .
[26] M. Davison,et al. Concurrent schedules: undermatching and control by previous experimental conditions. , 1979, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[27] L. Green. Preference as a function of the correlation between stimuli and reinforcement outcomes , 1980 .
[28] Wyckoff Lb. The role of observing responses in discrimination learning. Part I. , 1952 .
[29] M R D'Amato,et al. Note on delay-interval illumination effects on retention in monkeys (Cebus apella). , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[30] Edmund Fantino,et al. Self-control and general models of choice. , 1976 .
[31] R. Shull,et al. Delay or rate of food delivery as determiners of response rate. , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[32] S. B. Kendall. Variations of two temporal parameters in observing response procedures , 1975 .
[33] R. Herrnstein. SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT. , 1964, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[34] Alice R. Jwaideh,et al. Conditioned reinforcement as a function of duration of stimulus. , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[35] M C Davison,et al. Preference for fixed-interval schedules: effects of unequal initial links. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[36] N Squires,et al. A model for choice in simple concurrent and concurrent-chains schedules. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[37] M C Davison,et al. Preference for fixed-interval schedules: effects of initial-link length. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[38] H Rachlin,et al. Pigeons' preferences for stimulus information: effects of amount of information. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[39] P. Killeen. On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[40] R J Summers,et al. Effect of delay-interval stimuli on delayed symbolic matching to sample in the pigeon. , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[41] R. Herrnstein,et al. Preference reversal and delayed reinforcement , 1981 .
[42] R. Herrnstein,et al. Choice and delay of reinforcement. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[43] Ben A. Williams,et al. Information effects on the response-reinforcer association , 1978 .
[44] J A Nevin,et al. Conditioned reinforcement and choice. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[45] M. Marr,et al. Choice and reinforcement delay. , 1980, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[46] Marvin Z. Deluty. Similarities of the Matching Law to Other Models of Conditioning , 1977 .
[47] R. Cicerone,et al. Preference for mixed versus constant delay of reinforcement. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[48] S. H. Chung,et al. Effects of delayed reinforcement in a concurrent situation. , 1965, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[49] E Fantino,et al. Relative delay of reinforcement and choice. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[50] A. Catania,et al. Freedom and knowledge: an experimental analysis of preference in pigeons. , 1975, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[51] S. Hanson,et al. Arousal: its genesis and manifestation as response rate. , 1978, Psychological review.
[52] D Macewen,et al. The effects of terminal-link fixed-interval and variable-interval schedules on responding under concurrent chained schedules. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[53] M. Davison. Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[54] M C Davison,et al. Preference for fixed-interval schedules: an alternative model. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[55] R. Rescorla. Effect of a stimulus intervening between CS and US in autoshaping. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.