Beyond the Requirements: Improving Public Participation in EIA

Virtually every environmental planner at some time deals with environmental impact assessment (EIA). Public participation is required in most environmental impact assessment programmesaround the world. However, citizen involvement is often reduced to a procedural exercise instead of a substantive process to include the public in environmental decision making. This paper examines public participation in EIA and provides ways to improve its effectiveness. We first examine the rationales for public involvement and its institutionalization through EIA. Next, we analyse the shortcomings and strengths of common approaches to public involvement. Our analysis, supported by two case studies, suggests that going beyond the minimum requirements can benefit the public, the project proponent and the final plan. We conclude with practical steps to improve public participation programmes in environmental planning and decision making.

[1]  Douglas J. Amy,et al.  The politics of environmental mediation , 1988 .

[2]  Michael Wheeler,et al.  Environmental Dispute Resolution , 1984, Environment, Development, and Public Policy.

[3]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[4]  Matthew S. Carroll,et al.  Federally Protected Rivers: The Need for Effective Local Involvement , 1992 .

[5]  Larry W. Canter,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment , 1995 .

[6]  D. Kolb,et al.  Planning in the Face of Power. , 1988 .

[7]  Gail Bingham,et al.  Resolving Environmental Disputes: A Decade of Experience , 1986 .

[8]  Leonard Ortolano,et al.  Environmental regulation and impact assessment , 1997 .

[9]  C. Tauxe Marginalizing Public Participation in Local Planning: An Ethnographic Account , 1995 .

[10]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .

[11]  S. Ramamoorthy,et al.  The professional practice of environmental management , 1989 .

[12]  B. Barber Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age , 1985 .

[13]  J. Mccarthy,et al.  Negotiating settlements : a guide to environmental mediation , 1984 .

[14]  A. Shepherd,et al.  Strategic environmental assessment for sustainable urban development , 1996 .

[15]  H. Wollmann „Citizen Participation“ in USA , 1973 .

[16]  R. B. McLean,et al.  Reasons and strategies for more effective NEPA implementation , 1993 .

[17]  P. Slovic Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[18]  R. Platt The 2020 Water Supply Study For Metropolitan Boston: The Demise of Diversion , 1995 .

[19]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  “The Public” Vs. “The Experts”: Perceived Vs. Actual Disagreements About Risks of Nuclear Power , 1983 .

[20]  E. Gellhorn Public Participation in Administrative Proceedings , 1972 .

[21]  E. A. Blaug Use of the environmental assessment by federal agencies in NEPA implementation , 1993 .

[22]  T. Webler,et al.  Public Participation in Impact Assess-ment: A Social Learning Perspective , 1995 .