Cultural Universality Versus Particularity in CMC

Abstract Cultural factors are often identified as a crucial influence on the success or failure of information systems in general and computer-mediated communication (CMC) in particular. Several authors have suggested ways in which management can accommodate these factors or solve the problem they pose. This paper attempts to go one step beyond management measures and ask whether there is a theoretical foundation on which one can base the mutual influence of culture and CMC. In order to find such a theoretical basis the paper discusses the question whether there are aspects of culture that are universal or whether culture is always particular. In the course of this discussion the concept of culture is defined and its relationship with technology is analysed. As a solution the paper suggests a Habermasian approach to culture which sees a universal background to particular cultures in the structure of communication which creates and sustains culture. The paper then tries to give an outlook how such a Habermasian theory of culture can enable designers and users of CMC to reflect on their activity and improve the quality and reach of CMC.

[1]  Christine Halverson,et al.  Social translucence: designing social infrastructures that make collective activity visible , 2002, CACM.

[2]  Emmanuel Lévinas,et al.  Le temps et l'autre , 1983 .

[3]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Mine or ours: email privacy expectations, employee attitudes, and perceived work environment characteristics , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[4]  Mike Metcalfe,et al.  Arguing for Information Systems Project Definition , 2002, Global and Organizational Discourse about Information Technology.

[5]  Edgar A. Whitley,et al.  Placing Language in the Foreground: Themes and Methods in Information Technology Discourse , 2002, Global and Organizational Discourse about Information Technology.

[6]  Hermann Lübbe.  Der Lebenssinn der Industriegesellschaft : über die moralische Verfassung der wissenschaftlich-technischen Zivilisation , 1994 .

[7]  Charles Ess.  Cultures in CollisionPhilosophical Lessons from Computer‐Mediated Communication , 2002 .

[8]  Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic.  Critical Information Systems Research: A Habermasian Approach , 2001, ECIS.

[9]  Manuel Castells,et al.  The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Volume I. The Rise of the Network Society , 1997 .

[10]  D. Robey,et al.  Cultural analysis of the organizational consequences of information technology , 1994 .

[11]  C. Ess.  Computer-mediated colonization, the renaissance, and educational imperatives for an intercultural global village , 2002, Ethics and Information Technology.

[12]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[13]  Peter Ulrich,et al.  Integrative Wirtschaftsethik : Grundlagen einer lebensdienlichen Ökonomie , 2001 .

[14]  M. Castells.  The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture , 1999 .

[15]  Amit Pinchevski,et al.  Ethics on the line , 2003 .

[16]  Beth Kolko.  Intellectual Property in Synchronous and Collaborative Virtual Space. , 1998 .

[17]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Four paradigms of information systems development , 1989, CACM.

[18]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Studying Knowledge Management in Information Systems Resarch: Discourses and Theoretical Assumptions , 2002, MIS Q..

[19]  Reagan M. Ramsower,et al.  Cyberethics: Social and Moral Issues in the Computer Age , 2000 .

[20]  Alessandro Gamba.  Lust an Moral. Die natürliche Sehnsucht nach Werten , 1999 .

[21]  John M. Ward,et al.  Reconciling the IT/business relationship: a troubled marriage in need of guidance , 1996, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Werner Ulrich.  A Philosophical Staircase for Information Systems Definition, Design, and Development: A Discursive Approach to Reflective Practice in ISD (Part 1) , 2001 .

[23]  Debra Howcroft,et al.  Paradoxes of participatory practices: the Janus role of the systems developer , 2003, Inf. Organ..

[24]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Cross-Cultural Software Production and Use: A Structurational Analysis , 2002, MIS Q..

[25]  U. Beck,et al.  Was ist Globalisierung? : Irrtümer des Globalismus : Antworten auf Globalisierung , 1997 .

[26]  Amber Settle,et al.  Debating E-Commerce: Engaging Students in Current Events , 2002, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[27]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Crisis in the IS Field? A Critical Reflection on the State of the Discipline , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Michael S. H. Heng,et al.  From Habermas's communicative theory to practice on the internet , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[29]  J. Habermas.  Faktizität und Geltung : Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats , 1992 .

[30]  M. Castells,et al.  The Hacker Ethic and the Spirit of the Information Age , 2001 .

[31]  S. Herring.  Computer-mediated communication : linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives , 1996 .

[32]  Paul Ricoeur.  Soi même comme un autre , 1990 .

[33]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Identifying Software Project Risks: An International Delphi Study , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[34]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[35]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems as rational discourse: an application of Habermas's theory of communicative action , 1988 .

[36]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Realizing Emancipatory Principles in Information Systems Development: The Case for ETHICS , 1994, MIS Q..

[37]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Transfer of Information Technology to the Arab World: A Test of Cultural Influence Modeling , 2001, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[38]  Marc Smith,et al.  Tools for navigating large social cyberspaces , 2002, CACM.

[39]  A. Gehlen.  Der Mensch : seine Natur und seine Stellung in der Welt , 1952 .