Large-Scale MIMO Versus Network MIMO for Multicell Interference Mitigation

This paper compares two important downlink multicell interference mitigation techniques, namely, large-scale (LS) multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) and network MIMO. We consider a cooperative wireless cellular system operating in time-division duplex (TDD) mode, wherein each cooperating cluster includes B base-stations (BSs), each equipped with multiple antennas and scheduling K single-antenna users. In an LS-MIMO system, each BS employs BM antennas not only to serve its scheduled users, but also to null out interference caused to the other users within the cooperating cluster using zero-forcing (ZF) beamforming. In a network MIMO system, each BS is equipped with only M antennas, but interference cancellation is realized by data and channel state information exchange over the backhaul links and joint downlink transmission using ZF beamforming. Both systems are able to completely eliminate intra-cluster interference and to provide the same number of spatial degrees of freedom per user. Assuming the uplink-downlink channel reciprocity provided by TDD, both systems are subject to identical channel acquisition overhead during the uplink pilot transmission stage. Further, the available sum power at each cluster is fixed and assumed to be equally distributed across the downlink beams in both systems. Building upon the channel distribution functions and using tools from stochastic ordering, this paper shows, however, that from a performance point of view, users experience better quality of service, averaged over small-scale fading, under an LS-MIMO system than a network MIMO system. Numerical simulations for a multicell network reveal that this conclusion also holds true with regularized ZF beamforming scheme. Hence, given the likely lower cost of adding excess number of antennas at each BS, LS-MIMO could be the preferred route toward interference mitigation in cellular networks .

[1]  Sean A. Ramprashad,et al.  Cellular vs. Network MIMO: A comparison including the channel state information overhead , 2009, 2009 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[2]  Stephen V. Hanly,et al.  Base Station Cooperation on the Downlink: Large System Analysis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[3]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Coverage in multi-antenna two-tier networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[4]  Thomas L. Marzetta,et al.  Noncooperative Cellular Wireless with Unlimited Numbers of Base Station Antennas , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[5]  Dongning Guo,et al.  Spatial Interference Cancellation for Multiantenna Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[6]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Multiuser MIMO in Distributed Antenna Systems With Out-of-Cell Interference , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[7]  Gerhard Fettweis,et al.  On multicell cooperative transmission in backhaul-constrained cellular systems , 2008, Ann. des Télécommunications.

[8]  Wei Yu,et al.  Multi-Cell MIMO Cooperative Networks: A New Look at Interference , 2010, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[9]  Andrea J. Goldsmith,et al.  On the optimality of multiantenna broadcast scheduling using zero-forcing beamforming , 2006, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[10]  Kiran Kuchi,et al.  Coverage and rate in cellular networks with multi-user spatial multiplexing , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[11]  Sheldon M. Ross,et al.  An elementary introduction to mathematical finance , 2002 .

[12]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Downlink MIMO HetNets: Modeling, Ordering Results and Performance Analysis , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[13]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Decentralized Precoding for Multicell MIMO Downlink , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.