COMPUTER ASSISTED SELF-INTERVIEWING TAILORED FOR YOUNG CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS

Self-administered questionnaires have many advantages, especially when sensitive questions are asked. However, paper self-administered questionnaires have a serious draw-back: only relatively simple questionnaires can be used. Computer Assisted Self-Interviewing (CASI) can overcome these problems, and make it possible to use very complex self-administered questionnaires. CASI can take several forms, for instance, it can be a part of a personal (CAPI)interview where the interviewer hands over the computer to the respondent for specific questions. Another form is a computerized version of the mail survey: Disk-by-Mail. We have used both forms in an application for very special populations. In the first study we implemented a Disk-by-Mail survey on bullying in primary schools; the respondents were 6428 pupils aged 8-12 years. The second study was a survey on personal networks, dating, and well-being of adolescents and young adults with a visual handicap (aged 14-24). This study was a mixed-mode CAPI and CASI survey. This paper presents a literature review of data quality in CASI-surveys, describes the general logistic of both surveys and the special adaptations we had to make, and presents empirical findings on data quality and general recommendations for the adaptation of computer assisted (self) interviewing for special populations.

[1]  T. Heberlein,et al.  Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis of the published literature. , 1978 .

[2]  Jerome Johnston,et al.  Reducing Response Effects for Sensitive Questions: A Computer-Assisted Self Interview with Audio , 1995 .

[3]  Charles F Turner,et al.  AUDIO AND VIDEO COMPUTER-ASSISTED SELF INTERVIEWING: Preliminary Tests of New Technologies for Data Collection. , 1994, Journal of official statistics.

[4]  T. H. Harrell,et al.  Validation of an automated 16PF administration procedure. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[5]  Ger Snijkers,et al.  The Effect of Computer-assisted Interviewing on Data Quality. A Review , 1995 .

[6]  Suzanne P. Weisband,et al.  Self disclosure on computer forms: meta-analysis and implications , 1996, CHI.

[7]  Seymour Sudman,et al.  Response Effects in Surveys: A Review and Synthesis , 1974 .

[8]  William M. K. Trochim,et al.  An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. , 1989 .

[9]  William L. Nicholls,et al.  The Effect of New Data Collection Technologies on Survey Data Quality , 1997 .

[10]  F. Strack,et al.  The impact of administration mode on response effects in survey measurement , 1991 .

[11]  D. Leeuw,et al.  Data Quality in Mail, Telephone and Face to Face Surveys. , 1992 .

[12]  Tom W. Smith,et al.  ASKING SENSITIVE QUESTIONS THE IMPACT OF DATA COLLECTION MODE, QUESTION FORMAT, AND QUESTION CONTEXT , 1996 .

[13]  Andreas Beckenbach,et al.  Computer-Assisted Questioning: the New Survey Methods in the Perception of the Respondents , 1995 .

[14]  Jacqueline L. Scott.  Children as Respondents: Methods for Improving Data Quality , 1997 .

[15]  D. Dillman.  Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[16]  F. Drasgow,et al.  Equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis. , 1993 .

[17]  D. Mead,et al.  VALIDATION OF A COMPUTER ADMINISTERED MARITAL ADJUSTMENT TEST , 1985 .