Trabecular alveolar bone microarchitecture in the human mandible using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

OBJECTIVES Cancellous bone microarchitecture in the mandible can influence the success of dental implant osseointegration. The aims of this study were to explore the feasibility of two-dimensional (2D) high resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the evaluation of trabecular bone architecture and to compare architecture parameters derived from MR images between different areas in the mandible, and between sex and dental status. METHODS 45 mandibular bone specimens (8 mm thickness) were cut from 15 fresh cadavers. MR images were obtained at 2 T using a multislice 2D spin-echo sequence. After MR image binarization, histomorphometry parameters, i.e. bone area fraction (BAF), specific perimeter (La), trabecular bone width (Tb.Wi), trabecular bone separation (Tb.Sp) and trabecular network anisotropy (R), were computed from the mean intercept length. The angle between trabeculae and tooth axis and the Euler-Poincaré characteristics (EPCs) were also computed. RESULTS BAF, Tb.Wi and R were significantly higher in male specimens compared with female specimens, whereas Tb.Sp was significantly lower. The apparent Tb.Wi was found to be significantly higher in dentate specimens compared with edentulous ones. The highest anisotropy, corresponding to the smallest R value, was seen in the incisal specimens. The preferential orientation of the trabeculae was close to perpendicular to the tooth axis, especially in the molar specimens. CONCLUSION BAF, La, Tb.Wi, Tb.Sp and R, the most variable parameters, may potentially have a relationship with the biomechanical competence of trabecular bone and play a role both in primary stabilization of dental implant and the time needed before loading.

[1]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Combination of topological parameters and bone volume fraction better predicts the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  P. Meunier,et al.  The Degree of Mineralization of Bone Tissue Measured by Computerized Quantitative Contact Microradiography , 2002, Calcified Tissue International.

[3]  M W Bidez,et al.  Mechanical properties of trabecular bone in the human mandible: implications for dental implant treatment planning and surgical placement. , 1999, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[4]  Theocharis Antoniadis,et al.  Bone labelling on micro-magnetic resonance images , 1999, Medical Image Anal..

[5]  S Majumdar,et al.  A review of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of trabecular bone micro-architecture: contribution to the prediction of biomechanical properties and fracture prevalence. , 1998, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[6]  J. Hirsch,et al.  Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis. , 1998, European journal of oral sciences.

[7]  S. Majumdar,et al.  High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: three-dimensional trabecular bone architecture and biomechanical properties. , 1998, Bone.

[8]  J. Hirsch,et al.  Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. , 1998, European journal of oral sciences.

[9]  C. Simmons,et al.  Method‐Based Differences in the Automated Analysis of the Three‐Dimensional Morphology of Trabecular Bone , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[10]  S. Majumdar,et al.  High Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Calcaneus: Age-Related Changes in Trabecular Structure and Comparison with Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry Measurements , 1997, Calcified Tissue International.

[11]  C. Simmons,et al.  Trabecular bone morphology from micro‐magnetic resonance imaging , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[12]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Analysis of trabecular bone structure in the distal radius using high-resolution MRI , 1994, European Radiology.

[13]  M. Drezner,et al.  Bone histomorphometry: Standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units: Report of the asbmr histomorphometry nomenclature committee , 1987, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[14]  A. Parfitt,et al.  Trabecular bone architecture in the pathogenesis and prevention of fracture. , 1987, The American journal of medicine.

[15]  M. Kleerekoper,et al.  Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss. , 1983, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[16]  W. J. Whitehouse The quantitative morphology of anisotropic trabecular bone , 1974, Journal of microscopy.

[17]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure in the distal radius: Relationship with X-ray tomographic microscopy and biomechanics , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[18]  P. Hanes,et al.  Histologic observations of bone remodeling adjacent to endosteal dental implants. , 1995, The Journal of oral implantology.

[19]  C. Turner,et al.  On Wolff's law of trabecular architecture. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.