An assessment of the economic and environmental potential of biomass production in an agricultural region

Abstract The establishment of deep-rooted perennial species and their processing for biomass-based products such as renewable energy can have benefits for both local and global scale environmental objectives. In this study, we assess the potential economic viability of biomass production in the South Australian River Murray Corridor and quantify the resultant benefits for local and global scale environmental objectives. We model the spatial distribution of economically viable biomass production in a Geographic Information System and quantify the model sensitivity and uncertainty using Monte Carlo analysis. The total potentially viable area for biomass production under the Most Likely Scenario is 360,728 ha (57.7% of the dryland agricultural area), producing over 3 million tonnes of green biomass per annum, with a total Net Present Value over 100 years of A$ 88 million. The salinity in the River Murray could be reduced by 2.65 EC (μS/cm) over a 100-year timeframe, and over 96,000 ha of land with high wind erosion potential could be stabilised over a much shorter period. With sufficient generating capacity, our Most Likely Scenario suggests that economically viable biomass production could reduce carbon emissions by over 1.7 million tonnes per annum through the production of renewable energy and a reduced reliance on coal-based electricity generation. Our analyses suggest that biomass production is a potentially viable alternative agricultural system that can have substantial local scale environmental benefits with complimentary global scale benefits for climate change mitigation.

[1]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[2]  R. J. Raison.  Opportunities and impediments to the expansion of forest bioenergy in Australia , 2006 .

[3]  A. Faaij,et al.  Potential of biomass energy out to 2100, for four IPCC SRES land-use scenarios , 2005 .

[4]  Yolanda Lechón,et al.  Environmental and socioeconomic aspects in the strategic analysis of a biomass power plant integration , 1999 .

[5]  D. Bell.  Australian Trees for the Rehabilitation of Waterlogged and Salinity-damaged Landscapes , 1999 .

[6]  D. Saunders,et al.  Land use and ecosystems. , 2005 .

[7]  N. Rosenberg.  A Biomass Future for the North American Great Plains: Toward Sustainable Land Use and Mitigation of Greenhouse Warming , 2007 .

[8]  Bruce Talbot,et al.  Assessment of forest-fuel resources in Denmark: technical and economic availability , 2004 .

[9]  G. Bostedt.  Review: Thomas Sterner (2003): Policy instruments for environmental and natural resource management , 2003 .

[10]  Stephen P. Slinsky,et al.  Bioenergy Crop Production in the United States: Potential Quantities, Land Use Changes, and Economic Impacts on the Agricultural Sector , 2003 .

[11]  R. Stirzaker,et al.  Agroforestry for water management in the cropping zone of southern Australia , 1999, Agroforestry Systems.

[12]  Jenny Goldie,et al.  In Search of Sustainability , 2005 .

[13]  Paul W. Gallagher,et al.  Supply and Social Cost Estimates for Biomass from Crop Residues in the United States , 2003 .

[14]  Stelios Rozakis,et al.  Multiple Criteria Analysis of Bio-energy Projects: Evaluation of Bio-Electricity Production in Farsala Plain, Greece , 2001 .

[15]  H. Audus,et al.  Large-scale economic integration of electricity from short-rotation woody crops , 2001 .

[16]  Michela Robba,et al.  Optimizing forest biomass exploitation for energy supply at a regional level , 2004 .

[17]  Qunying Luo,et al.  Spatial Analysis of Environmental Change Impacts on Wheat Production in Mid-Lower North, South Australia , 2005 .

[18]  F. Goor,et al.  Assessment of the potential of willow SRC plants for energy production in areas contaminated by radionuclide deposits: methodology and perspectives , 2001 .

[19]  Marie Lynn Miranda,et al.  Protecting the forest from the trees: the social costs of energy production in Sweden , 2001 .

[20]  Karl W. Steininger,et al.  Exploiting the Medium Term Biomass Energy Potentials in Austria: A Comparison of Costs and Macroeconomic Impact , 2003 .

[21]  B. Bryan,et al.  Market-Based Instrument approaches to implementing priority revegetation in the South Australian Murray-Darling Basin , 2006 .

[22]  B. McCarl,et al.  Economic Potential of Biomass Based Fuels for Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation , 2003 .

[23]  Marian Leimbach,et al.  Modeling Agriculture and Land Use in an Integrated Assessment Framework , 2003 .

[24]  Karen Updegraff,et al.  Environmental benefits of cropland conversion to hybrid poplar: economic and policy considerations , 2004 .

[25]  J. Ascough,et al.  Environmental and economic analysis of switchgrass production for water quality improvement in northeast Kansas. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[26]  Bernd Möller,et al.  Analysing transport costs of Danish forest wood chip resources by means of continuous cost surfaces , 2007 .

[27]  D. R. Buxton,et al.  Comparative Economic Analysis of Perennial, Annual and Intercrops for Biomass Production , 2001 .

[28]  Qunying Luo,et al.  Probabilistic distributions of regional climate change and their application in risk analysis of wheat production , 2005 .

[29]  T. Sterner,et al.  Policy Instruments for Environmental and Natural Resource Management , 2002 .

[30]  A. Lansink,et al.  Editorial Introduction: Economics of Sustainable Energy and Agriculture , 2003 .

[31]  Melvyn F. Askew,et al.  The potential for biomass and energy crops in agriculture in Europe, in land use, policy and rural economy terms , 2001 .

[32]  A. Monti,et al.  A full economic analysis of switchgrass under different scenarios in Italy estimated by BEE model. , 2007 .

[33]  P. Flynn,et al.  Biomass power cost and optimum plant size in western Canada , 2003 .

[34]  N. Crossman,et al.  Systematic regional planning for multiple objective natural resource management. , 2005, Journal of environmental management.

[35]  V. R. Tolbert,et al.  Environmental enhancement of U.S. biomass crop technologies: research results to date 1 Sponsored by , 1998 .

[36]  O. Bens,et al.  Production of bioenergy in post-mining landscapes in Lusatia: Perspectives and challenges for alternative landuse systems , 2000 .

[37]  Eric D. Larson,et al.  Method for spatially explicit calculations of potential biomass yields and assessment of land availability for biomass energy production in Northeastern Brazil , 2001 .

[38]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Stability: Energy for a Greenhouse Planet Advanced Technology Paths to Global Climate , 2008 .

[39]  H. Vandenhove,et al.  Economic viability of short rotation coppice for energy production for reuse of caesium-contaminated land in Belarus , 2002 .

[40]  M. Bennell,et al.  Plant Biometrics and Biomass Productivity in the River Murray Dryland Corridor , 2005 .