Increasing axial resolution of ultrasonic imaging with a joint sparse representation model.

The axial resolution of ultrasonic imaging is confined by the temporal width of acoustic pulse generated by the transducer, which has a limited bandwidth. Deconvolution can eliminate this effect, and therefore improve the resolution. However, most ultrasonic imaging methods perform deconvolution scan line by scan line, therefore the information embedded within the neighbor scan lines is unexplored, especially for those materials with layered structures such as blood vessels. In this paper, a joint sparse representation model is proposed to increase the axial resolution of ultrasonic imaging. The proposed model combines the sparse deconvolution along the axial direction with a sparsity-favoring constraint along the lateral direction. Since the constraint explores the information embedded within neighbour scan lines by connecting nearby pixels in the ultrasound image, the axial resolution of the image improves after deconvolution. Results on simulated data showed that the proposed method can increase resolution and discover layered structure. Moreover, results on real data showed that the proposed method can measure carotid intima-media thickness automatically with good quality (0.56±0.03 mm vs 0.60±0.06 mm manually).

[1]  Hui Zhong,et al.  Discover layered structure in ultrasound images with a joint sparse representation model , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS).

[2]  J. Idier,et al.  A linear model approach for ultrasonic inverse problems with attenuation and dispersion , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[3]  Denis Friboulet,et al.  Pre-beamformed RF signal reconstruction in medical ultrasound using compressive sensing. , 2013, Ultrasonics.

[4]  Charles Soussen,et al.  Ultrasonic non destructive testing based on sparse deconvolution , 2012 .

[5]  Cishen Zhang,et al.  A blind deconvolution approach to ultrasound imaging , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[6]  Robin O Cleveland,et al.  Sparsity driven ultrasound imaging. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  A. Ng,et al.  Resolution in ultrasound imaging , 2011 .

[8]  Zongben Xu.  Data Modeling: Visual Psychology Approach and L1/2 Regularization Theory , 2011 .

[9]  Michael P. Friedlander,et al.  Probing the Pareto Frontier for Basis Pursuit Solutions , 2008, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[10]  Yaakov Tsaig,et al.  Fast Solution of $\ell _{1}$ -Norm Minimization Problems When the Solution May Be Sparse , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[11]  R. Jirik,et al.  Two-dimensional blind Bayesian deconvolution of medical ultrasound images , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[12]  M. Bots,et al.  Measurement of carotid intima–media thickness to assess progression and regression of atherosclerosis , 2008, Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine.

[13]  Christopher B. Kendall,et al.  Use of carotid ultrasound to identify subclinical vascular disease and evaluate cardiovascular disease risk: a consensus statement from the American Society of Echocardiography Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Task Force. Endorsed by the Society for Vascular Medicine. , 2008, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[14]  Oleg V. Michailovich,et al.  Blind Deconvolution of Medical Ultrasound Images: A Parametric Inverse Filtering Approach , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  William D. O'Brien,et al.  A regularized inverse approach to ultrasonic pulse-echo imaging , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  A. Tannenbaum,et al.  Despeckling of medical ultrasound images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[17]  E. Candès,et al.  The Dantzig selector: Statistical estimation when P is much larger than n , 2005, math/0506081.

[18]  Dmitry M. Malioutov,et al.  Homotopy continuation for sparse signal representation , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..

[19]  Peter J. Huber,et al.  Robust Statistics , 2005, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[20]  T Olofsson,et al.  Minimum entropy deconvolution of pulse-echo signals acquired from attenuative layered media. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[22]  P. Lions,et al.  Image recovery via total variation minimization and related problems , 1997 .

[23]  T. Taxt,et al.  Restoration of medical ultrasound images using two-dimensional homomorphic deconvolution , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[24]  P Pignoli,et al.  Intimal plus medial thickness of the arterial wall: a direct measurement with ultrasound imaging. , 1986, Circulation.

[25]  Mostafa Fatemi,et al.  Ultrasonic B-Scan Imaging: Theory of Image Formation and a Technique for Restoration1 , 1980 .

[26]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Graph Implementations for Nonsmooth Convex Programs , 2008, Recent Advances in Learning and Control.

[27]  Mila Nikolova,et al.  Local Strong Homogeneity of a Regularized Estimator , 2000, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[28]  T. Taxt,et al.  Noise robust one-dimensional blind deconvolution of medical ultrasound images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[29]  R. Tibshirani.  Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[30]  J A Jensen,et al.  Estimation of pulses in ultrasound B-scan images. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[31]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Least angle regression , 2004, math/0406456.