Machine learning algorithms for damage detection under operational and environmental variability

The goal of this article is to detect structural damage in the presence of operational and environmental variations using vibration-based damage identification procedures. For this purpose, four machine learning algorithms are applied based on the auto-associative neural network, factor analysis, Mahalanobis distance, and singular value decomposition. A base-excited three-story frame structure was tested in laboratory environment to obtain time-series data from an array of accelerometers under several structural state conditions. Tests were performed with varying stiffness and mass conditions with the assumption that these sources of variability are representative of changing operational and environmental conditions. Damage is simulated through nonlinear effects introduced by a bumper mechanism that induces a repetitive, impact-type nonlinearity. This mechanism intends to simulate the cracks that open and close under dynamic loads or loose connections that rattle. The unique contribution of this study is a direct comparison of the four proposed machine learning algorithms that have been reported as reliable approaches to separate structural conditions with changes resulting from damage from changes caused by operational and environmental variations.

[1]  Keith Worden,et al.  An introduction to structural health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[2]  Jerome P. Lynch,et al.  A summary review of wireless sensors and sensor networks for structural health monitoring , 2006 .

[3]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Structural health monitoring algorithm comparisons using standard data sets , 2009 .

[4]  Yi-Qing Ni,et al.  Technology developments in structural health monitoring of large-scale bridges , 2005 .

[5]  M. Kramer Nonlinear principal component analysis using autoassociative neural networks , 1991 .

[6]  Subhash Sharma Applied multivariate techniques , 1995 .

[7]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  The fundamental axioms of structural health monitoring , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[8]  S. Alampalli,et al.  Influence of in-service environment on modal parameters , 1998 .

[9]  Keith Worden,et al.  DAMAGE DETECTION USING OUTLIER ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[10]  K. Worden,et al.  The application of machine learning to structural health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[11]  H. Kantz,et al.  Nonlinear time series analysis , 1997 .

[12]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring Studies of the Alamosa Canyon and I-40 Bridges , 2000 .

[13]  J. Elsner,et al.  Singular Spectrum Analysis: A New Tool in Time Series Analysis , 1996 .

[14]  Gaëtan Kerschen,et al.  Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions - Part II: local PCA for non-linear cases , 2005 .

[15]  Mário Pimentel,et al.  Safety appraisal of an existing bridge via detailed modelling , 2008 .

[16]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Novelty detection in a changing environment: Regression and interpolation approaches , 2002 .

[17]  Gaëtan Kerschen,et al.  Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions—Part I: A linear analysis , 2005 .

[18]  David A. Nix,et al.  Vibration–based structural damage identification , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[19]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Applying the LANL Statistical Pattern Recognition Paradigm for Structural Health Monitoring to Data from a Surface-Effect Fast Patrol Boat , 2001 .

[20]  Maria Q. Feng,et al.  Long-Term Monitoring and Identification of Bridge Structural Parameters , 2009 .

[21]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  ROC Graphs: Notes and Practical Considerations for Researchers , 2007 .

[22]  Chin-Hsiung Loh,et al.  Damage detection accommodating nonlinear environmental effects by nonlinear principal component analysis , 2009 .

[23]  Piotr Omenzetter,et al.  Application of time series analysis for bridge monitoring , 2006 .

[24]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Statistical Damage Classification Under Changing Environmental and Operational Conditions , 2002 .

[25]  R. Ruotolo,et al.  USING SVD TO DETECT DAMAGE IN STRUCTURES WITH DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS , 1999 .

[26]  B. Peeters,et al.  Vibration-based damage detection in civil engineering: excitation sources and temperature effects , 2001 .

[27]  Nam-Sik Kim,et al.  Effect of vehicle mass on the measured dynamic characteristics of bridges from traffic-induced vibration test , 2001 .

[28]  Samuel H. Huang,et al.  Comparison of Selected Model Evaluation Criteria for Maintenance Applications , 2004 .

[29]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Dynamic characterization and damage detection in the I-40 bridge over the Rio Grande , 1994 .