Combined numerical and experimental biomechanical characterization of soft collagen hydrogel substrate

This work presents a combined experimental–numerical framework for the biomechanical characterization of highly hydrated collagen hydrogels, namely with 0.20, 0.30 and 0.40 % (by weight) of collagen concentration. Collagen is the most abundant protein in the extracellular matrix of animals and humans. Its intrinsic biocompatibility makes collagen a promising substrate for embedding cells within a highly hydrated environment mimicking natural soft tissues. Cell behaviour is greatly influenced by the mechanical properties of the surrounding matrix, but the biomechanical characterization of collagen hydrogels has been challenging up to now, since they present non-linear poro-viscoelastic properties. Combining the stiffness outcomes from rheological experiments with relevant literature data on collagen permeability, poroelastic finite element (FE) models were developed. Comparison between experimental confined compression tests available in the literature and analogous FE stress relaxation curves showed a close agreement throughout the tests. This framework allowed establishing that the dynamic shear modulus of the collagen hydrogels is between 0.0097 ± 0.018 kPa for the 0.20 % concentration and 0.0601 ± 0.044 kPa for the 0.40 % concentration. The Poisson’s ratio values for such conditions lie within the range of 0.495–0.485 for 0.20 % and 0.480–0.470 for 0.40 %, respectively, showing that rheology is sensitive enough to detect these small changes in collagen concentration and thus allowing to link rheology results with the confined compression tests. In conclusion, this integrated approach allows for accurate constitutive modelling of collagen hydrogels. This framework sets the grounds for the characterization of related hydrogels and to the use of this collagen parameterization in more complex multiscale models.

[1]  A P G Castro,et al.  Intervertebral disc creep behavior assessment through an open source finite element solver. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  F. Lanni,et al.  Cell traction forces on soft biomaterials. I. Microrheology of type I collagen gels. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[3]  H. Van Oosterwyck,et al.  A poroviscoelastic description of fibrin gels. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  A. Carr,et al.  Comparing normal and torn rotator cuff tendons using dynamic shear analysis. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[5]  R. D. Wood,et al.  Nonlinear Continuum Mechanics for Finite Element Analysis , 1997 .

[6]  R. Reis,et al.  Current Concepts and Challenges in Osteochondral Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. , 2015, ACS biomaterials science & engineering.

[7]  Josep A Planell,et al.  Micro-finite element models of bone tissue-engineering scaffolds. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[8]  W M Lai,et al.  An analysis of the unconfined compression of articular cartilage. , 1984, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[9]  Victor H. Barocas,et al.  Volume-averaging theory for the study of the mechanics of collagen networks , 2007 .

[10]  Umber Cheema,et al.  Use of multiple unconfined compression for control of collagen gel scaffold density and mechanical properties. , 2006, Soft matter.

[11]  Frank Frank Baaijens,et al.  Biomechanics : concepts and computation , 2009 .

[12]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Poisson ratio can play a crucial role in mechanical properties of biocomposites , 2006 .

[13]  A. P. G. Castro,et al.  Long-Term Creep Behavior of the Intervertebral Disk: Comparison between Bioreactor Data and Numerical Results , 2014, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol..

[14]  Yaser Shanjani,et al.  Vascularization in Bone Tissue Engineering Constructs , 2015, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Yanhang Zhang,et al.  An experimental and modeling study of the viscoelastic behavior of collagen gel. , 2013, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[16]  Hideki Mori,et al.  Dynamic viscoelastic properties of collagen gels in the presence and absence of collagen fibrils. , 2012, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[17]  A van der Voet,et al.  A comparison of finite element codes for the solution of biphasic poroelastic problems. , 1997, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[18]  T. Ovaert,et al.  The effect of collagen crosslinking on the biphasic poroviscoelastic cartilage properties determined from a semi-automated microindentation protocol for stress relaxation. , 2014, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[19]  P J Prendergast,et al.  A Comparison of Finite Element Codes for the Solution of Biphasic Poroelastic Problems , 1996, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[20]  P. Riches,et al.  On the poisson's ratio of the nucleus pulposus. , 2013, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  Keita Ito,et al.  Contribution of collagen fibers to the compressive stiffness of cartilaginous tissues , 2013, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[22]  D. Benayahu,et al.  A new class of bio-composite materials of unique collagen fibers. , 2014, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[23]  L. Petzold,et al.  Rheology of reconstituted type I collagen gel in confined compression , 1997 .

[24]  G. Reilly,et al.  Mesenchymal stem cell responses to mechanical stimuli. , 2012, Muscles, ligaments and tendons journal.

[25]  Hsien-Chang Chang,et al.  Mechanical properties of collagen gels derived from rats of different ages , 2005, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[26]  Alessandro Sannino,et al.  Collagen scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering: the benefit of fibrin glue and the proper culture time in an infant cartilage model. , 2014, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[27]  Philip E Riches,et al.  Confined compression of collagen hydrogels. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  J. Urbach,et al.  Size-dependent rheology of type-I collagen networks. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[29]  S. Klisch,et al.  Poroviscoelastic finite element model including continuous fiber distribution for the simulation of nanoindentation tests on articular cartilage. , 2014, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[30]  Victor H Barocas,et al.  Microstructural mechanics of collagen gels in confined compression: poroelasticity, viscoelasticity, and collapse. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[31]  Steen Krenk,et al.  Non-linear Modeling and Analysis of Solids and Structures , 2009 .