Orientation congruency effects in visual search.

Subjects searched for the letter E in a background of Ls and Fs in displays that had 1, 2, 4, 8, or 12 letters. The letters could be shown at one of six orientations (upright or rotated clockwise in 60 degrees increments). The displays were either congruent for orientation (all letters had the same orientation) or incongruent (letters in haphazard orientations except for the target on E-present trials). Search time increased linearly with the number of letters in the display, and more so for E-absent trials than for E-present trials. Letter orientation, in general, increased search time and produced an M-shaped function. Furthermore, orientation effects were attenuated in congruent displays relative to those produced by incongruent displays. The results demonstrated systematic orientation effects on the time to search for a simple pattern embedded in simple backgrounds, and provided converging evidence for the orientation-congruency effect found by Jolicoeur (1990b, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 351-364).

[1]  W H Teichner,et al.  Laws of visual choice reaction time. , 1974, Psychological review.

[2]  J. Gibson,et al.  Orientation in visual perception; The recognition of familiar plane forms in differing orientations. , 1935 .

[3]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  Orientation congruency effects on the identification of disoriented shapes. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  M. Corballis,et al.  Decisions about identity and orientation of rotated letters and digits , 1978, Memory & cognition.

[5]  M. G. Eley,et al.  Identifying rotated letter-like symbols , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[6]  M. Tarr,et al.  Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  G. V. Dearborn.  Recognition under objective reversal. , 1899 .

[8]  Irvin Rock,et al.  Orientation and form , 1974 .

[9]  M. White.  Naming and categorization of tilted alphanumeric characters do not require mental rotation , 1980 .

[10]  M. Corballis,et al.  What’s up in mental rotation? , 1976 .

[11]  P. A. Kolers,et al.  Orientation of letters and their speed of recognition , 1969 .

[12]  M. Corballis,et al.  Mental rotation under head tilt: Factors influencing the location of the subjective reference frame , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  I Biederman,et al.  Metric invariance in object recognition: a review and further evidence. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[14]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  Effects of orientation on the identification of simple visual patterns. , 1984, Canadian journal of psychology.

[15]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  The spatial frame of reference in object naming and discrimination of left-right reflections , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[16]  M. Corballis,et al.  Latency to categorize disoriented alphanumeric characters as letters or digits. , 1978 .

[17]  R. Maki.  Naming and locating the tops of rotated pictures. , 1986, Canadian journal of psychology.

[18]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[19]  P. A. Kolers,et al.  Orientation of letters and errors in their recognition , 1969 .

[20]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  The time to identify disoriented letters: effects of practice and font. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.

[21]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Identification of Disoriented Objects: A Dual‐systems Theory , 1990 .

[22]  J. Norman,et al.  Why is word recognition impaired by disorientation while the identification of single letters is not? , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  A Koriat,et al.  Frames and images: sequential effects in mental rotation. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  M. Corballis.  Recognition of disoriented shapes. , 1988, Psychological review.

[25]  S. Guttenplan.  Mind and language , 1975 .

[26]  A Koriat,et al.  Establishing global and local correspondence between successive stimuli: the holistic nature of backward alignment. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  P. Jolicoeur.  Mental rotation and the identification of disoriented objects. , 1988, Canadian journal of psychology.

[28]  Y. Takano.  Perception of rotated forms: A theory of information types , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  Identification of disoriented objects: effects of context of prior presentation. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  A Koriat,et al.  What is rotated in mental rotation? , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  P. Jolicoeur.  The time to name disoriented natural objects , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[32]  I. Rock.  The orientation of forms on the retina and in the environment. , 1956, The American journal of psychology.

[33]  I. Rock,et al.  The effect on form perception of change of orientation in the third dimension. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  L C Robertson,et al.  Reference frames in mental rotation. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.