A proportional approach to claims problems with a guaranteed minimum

In distribution problems, and specifically in bankruptcy issues, the Proportional (P) and the Egalitarian (EA) divisions are two of the most popular ways to resolve the conflict. Nonetheless, when using the egalitarian division, agents may receive more than her claim. We propose a compromise between the proportional and the egalitarian approaches by considering the restriction that no one receives more than her claim. We show that the most egalitarian compromise fulfilling this restriction ensures a minimum amount to each agent. We also show that this compromise can be interpreted as a process that works in two steps as follows: first, all agents receive an equal share up to the smallest claim if possible (egalitarian distribution), and then, the remaining estate (if any) is allocated proportionally to the remaining claims (proportional distribution). Finally, we obtain that the recursive application of this process finishes at the Constrained Equal Awards solution (CEA).

[1]  H. Moulin.  Priority Rules and Other Asymmetric Rationing Methods , 2000 .

[2]  R. Aumann,et al.  Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud , 1985 .

[3]  Barry O'Neill,et al.  A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud , 1982, Math. Soc. Sci..

[4]  Debraj Ray,et al.  A CONCEPT OF EGALITARIANISM UNDER PARTICIPATION , 1989 .

[5]  H. Peyton Young,et al.  Equity - in theory and practice , 1994 .

[6]  Carmen Herrero,et al.  Egalitarian rules in claims problems with indivisible goods , 2004 .

[7]  H. Peyton Young,et al.  On Dividing an Amount According to Individual Claims or Liabilities , 1987, Math. Oper. Res..

[8]  N. Dagan,et al.  A Noncooperative View of Consistent Bankruptcy Rules , 1994 .

[9]  Mark Voorneveld,et al.  Population Monotonic Allocation Schemes in Bankruptcy Games , 2002, Ann. Oper. Res..

[10]  Hervé Moulin,et al.  Axiomatic cost and surplus sharing , 2002 .

[11]  Carmen Herrero,et al.  Sustainability in bankruptcy problems , 2002 .

[12]  Debraj Ray,et al.  A Concept of Egalitarianism under Participation Constraints , 1989 .

[13]  William Thomson,et al.  Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey , 2003, Math. Soc. Sci..

[14]  Juan D. Moreno-Ternero,et al.  The Talmud rule and the securement of agents' awards , 2003, Math. Soc. Sci..

[15]  W. Thomson,et al.  A new solution to the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims , 2006 .

[16]  Gustavo Bergantiños,et al.  The equal award principle in problems with constraints and claims , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Luc Lauwers,et al.  Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims , 2007, International Journal of Game Theory.