Assessment of integration of different biomass gasification alternatives in a district-heating system

With increasingly stringent CO2 emission reduction targets, incentives for efficient use of limited biomass resources increase. Technologies for gasification of biomass may then play a key role given their potential for high electrical efficiency and multiple outputs; not only electricity but also bio transport fuels and district heat. The aim of this study is to assess the economic consequences and the potential for CO2 reduction of integration of a biomass gasification plant into a district-heating (DH) system. The study focuses on co-location with an existing natural gas combined cycle heat and power plant in the municipal DH system of Goteborg, Sweden. The analysis is carried out using a systems modelling approach. The so-called MARTES model is used. MARTES is a simulating, DH systems supply model with a detailed time slice division. The economic robustness of different solutions is investigated by using different sets of parameters for electricity price, fuel prices and policy tools. In this study, it is assumed that not only tradable green certificates for electricity but also tradable green certificates for transport fuels exist. The economic results show strong dependence on the technical solutions and scenario assumptions but in most cases a stand-alone SNG-polygeneration plant with district-heat delivery is the cost-optimal solution. Its profitability is strongly dependent on policy tools and the price relation between biomass and fossil fuels. Finally, the results show that operation of the biomass gasification plants reduces the (DH) system's net emissions of CO2.

[1]  C.-O. Wene,et al.  Community-based regional energy/environmental planning , 1996 .

[2]  Jorma Nieminen,et al.  Biomass CFB gasifier connected to a 350 MWth steam boiler fired with coal and natural gas—THERMIE demonstration project in Lahti in Finland , 1998 .

[3]  Kristina Holmgren,et al.  Role of a district-heating network as a user of waste-heat supply from various sources : the case of Göteborg , 2006 .

[4]  A. Faaij,et al.  Efficiency and economy of wood-fired biomass energy systems in relation to scale regarding heat and power generation using combustion and gasification technologies , 2001 .

[5]  A. Faaij,et al.  Exploration of the possibilities for production of Fischer Tropsch liquids and power via biomass gasification , 2002 .

[6]  Krister Ståhl,et al.  Biomass IGCC at Värnamo, Sweden - Past and Future , 2004 .

[7]  André Faaij,et al.  Future prospects for production of methanol and hydrogen from biomass , 2002 .

[8]  Thore Berntsson,et al.  A tool for creating energy market scenarios for evaluation of investments in energy intensive industry , 2009 .

[9]  Arnaldo Walter,et al.  Performance evaluation of atmospheric biomass integrated gasifier combined cycle systems under different strategies for the use of low calorific gases , 2007 .

[10]  Simon Harvey.  Performance of a Biomass Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle CHP Plant Supplying Heat to a District Heating Network , 2000 .

[11]  Peter McKendry,et al.  Energy production from biomass (Part 3): Gasification technologies. , 2002, Bioresource technology.

[12]  Simon Harvey,et al.  Comparison of pulp-mill-integrated hydrogen production from gasified black liquor with stand-alone production from gasified biomass , 2007 .

[13]  Tomas Ekvall,et al.  HEATSPOT—a simulation tool for national district heating analyses , 2006 .

[14]  Dag Henning,et al.  Calculating the marginal costs of a district-heating utility , 2004 .

[15]  Simon Harvey,et al.  Opportunities for integration of biofuel gasifiers in natural-gas combined heat-and-power plants in district-heating systems , 2006 .

[16]  Arnaldo Walter,et al.  Feasibility analysis of co-fired combined-cycles using biomass-derived gas and natural gas , 2007 .

[17]  Robert De Kler.  Nuon's Magnum plant : a step towards sustainability , 2007 .