An availability bias in professional judgment.

When branches of a fault tree are pruned, subjects do not fully transfer the probability of those branches to the ‘all other’ category. This underestimation of the catch-all probability has been interpreted as an ‘out of sight, out of mind’ form of the availability bias. The present work replicates this underestimation bias with professional managers. It then demonstrates the effectiveness of a corrective tactic, extending the tree by generating additional causes, and also reveals that more easily retrieved short-term causes dominate the generation process. These results do not differ across managers' culture, education or experience. After evaluating such alternative explanations as category redefinition, we conclude that availability is a major cause, though possibly not the sole cause, of the underestimation bias.

[1]  R S Nickerson,et al.  Retrieval inhibition from part-set cuing: A persisting enigma in memory research , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[2]  E. Hirt,et al.  Probability and category redefinition in the fault tree paradigm. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Lawrence D. Phillips,et al.  CULTURAL VARIATION IN PROBABILISTIC THINKING: ALTERNATIVE WAYS OF DEALING WITH UNCERTAINTY* , 1980 .

[4]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Reasons for confidence. , 1980 .

[5]  Brian H. Ross,et al.  Multicausal Inference. Evaluation of Evidence in Causally Complex Situations , 1985 .

[6]  Robert S. Billings,et al.  Administrators' estimations of the probability of outcomes of school desegregation: A field test of the availability heuristic , 1980 .

[7]  V. Folkes,et al.  The Availability Heuristic and Perceived Risk , 1988 .

[8]  Carol A. Manning,et al.  The availability explanation of excessive plausibility assessments , 1981 .

[9]  Steven J. Sherman,et al.  The effects of explaining hypothetical future events: From possibility to probability to actuality and beyond , 1981 .

[10]  J. Carroll.  The Effect of Imagining an Event on Expectations for the Event: An Interpretation in Terms of the Availability Heuristic. , 1978 .

[11]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Self-Relevant Scenarios as Mediators of Likelihood Estimates and Compliance: Does Imagining Make It So? , 1982 .

[12]  M. Lepper,et al.  Considering the opposite: a corrective strategy for social judgment. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Melvin Manis,et al.  Can the availability heuristic explain vividness effects , 1986 .

[14]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  Availability and interference in predictive judgment. , 1984 .

[15]  Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[16]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[17]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Judging probable cause. , 1986 .

[18]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation. , 1978 .

[19]  Z. Peynircioǧlu.  On the generality of the part^set cuing effect: Evidence from nonmemory tasks. , 1987 .