Design of a Strategic-Tactical Stated-Choice Survey Methodology Using a Constructed Avatar

This paper presents findings from a small-sample qualitative study on people's activity travel behavior in the presence or absence of carsharing. A carsharing service provides its subscribers with short-term access to a fleet of shared cars. In previous research, subscribers have reported distinctive travel patterns, such as more car usage by subscribers than by non–car owners but less than by car owners. Reflexive techniques were used in which interviewees adapted a week of their recent activity travel behavior in response to stimuli. Findings from this study informed the design of a stated-choice survey that addressed three principal forms of complexity: (a) strategic-tactical choice situations, (b) situations in which respondents might select multiple interacting options in a single choice situation, and (c) situations in which sufficient knowledge of the individual survey respondent to tailor such a complex choice situation could not feasibly be gathered during a single interview. In the proposed design, the respondent indicates a strategic choice of which methods of travel to make available for use given a set of representative out-of-home activities. Accessibility to each activity by various means of travel is generated by using empirical distributions from Britain's National Travel Survey data sets to maximize plausibility of the information presented to respondents. An avatar (a virtual character for purposes of the survey) is constructed for each respondent on the basis of a small set of self-reported demographic characteristics. The use of multiday activity travel diaries would ideally involve multiple points of contact with each respondent at substantial cost. Therefore, an alternative method involving a single interview per respondent was sought.

[1]  Jessica ter Schure,et al.  Car-Sharing: Where and How It Succeeds , 2005 .

[2]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  On fitting mode specific constants in the presence of new options in RP/SP models , 2006 .

[3]  Julie M. Hupp,et al.  Risk Taking in Relationships: Differences in Deciding for Oneself Versus for a Friend , 2003 .

[4]  Jorge A. Laval,et al.  System optimum dynamic traffic assignment graphical solution method for a congested freeway and one destination , 2006 .

[5]  Thomas S Turrentine,et al.  Narrative Self-Identity and Societal Goals: Automotive Fuel Economy and Global Warming Policy , 2007 .

[6]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Modeling the choice continuum: an integrated model of residential location, auto ownership, bicycle ownership, and commute tour mode choice decisions , 2011 .

[7]  Laura J. Kray,et al.  Contingent Weighting in Self-Other Decision Making. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[8]  P. Jones,et al.  ‘HATS’: A Technique for Investigating Household Decisions , 1979 .

[9]  John M. Rose,et al.  Designing efficient stated choice experiments in the presence of reference alternatives , 2008 .

[10]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Revealing Differences in Willingness to Pay due to the Dimensionality of Stated Choice Designs: An Initial Assessment , 2006 .

[11]  Evan Polman Information distortion in self-other decision making , 2010 .

[12]  Harry Timmermans,et al.  Modelling Portfolio Choice in Transportation Research , 2009 .

[13]  E. Elton Modern portfolio theory and investment analysis , 1981 .

[14]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[15]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Combining stated and revealed choice research to simulate the neighbor effect: The case of hybrid-electric vehicles , 2009 .

[16]  Elliot W. Martin,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Emission Impacts of Carsharing in North America , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[17]  John W. Polak AN ANALYSIS OF CAR CLUB PARTICIPATION AND ITS ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS , 2009 .

[18]  Stephane Hess,et al.  Advanced discrete choice models with applications to transport demand , 2005 .

[19]  G. Sammer ENSURING QUALITY IN STATED RESPONSE SURVEYS. IN: TRANSPORT SURVEY QUALITY AND INNOVATION , 2003 .

[20]  Andrew J. Yates,et al.  Risk Taking in Decision Making for Others Versus the Self , 2002 .

[21]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  The Impact of Demographics, Built Environment Attributes, Vehicle Characteristics, and Gasoline Prices on Household Vehicle Holdings and Use , 2009 .

[22]  A. J. Richardson,et al.  Never mind the Data – Feel the Model * , 2001 .

[23]  R. Sack On Giving Advice. , 1985 .

[24]  Jean-Pierre Dubé Multiple Discreteness and Product Differentiation: Demand for Carbonated Soft Drinks , 2004 .

[25]  Gerd Sammer,et al.  Ensuring Quality in Stated Response Surveys , 2003 .

[26]  R. Cervero,et al.  San Francisco City CarShare: Longer-term travel-demand and car ownership impacts , 2006 .

[27]  Meh Lee-Gosselin,et al.  SCOPE AND POTENTIAL OF INTERACTIVE STATED RESPONSE DATA COLLECTION METHODS , 1996 .

[28]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of household transportation expenditures relative to other goods and services: an application to United States consumer expenditure data , 2009 .

[29]  M. McCubbin,et al.  Toward a pure best interests model of proxy decision making for incompetent psychiatric patients. , 1998, International journal of law and psychiatry.

[30]  N. Zollers,et al.  Daily decision-making in community residences: a social comparison of adults with and without mental retardation. , 1988, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[31]  R. Stancliffe Proxy respondents and quality of life , 2000 .

[32]  K. Train,et al.  Estimation on stated-preference experiments constructed from revealed-preference choices , 2008 .

[33]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  A Fundamental Prediction Error: Self-Others Discrepancies in Risk Preference , 1997 .

[34]  K. J. Radford Tactic selection in a complex decision situation , 1991, Conference Proceedings 1991 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[35]  Ariel Rubinstein,et al.  A Course in Game Theory , 1995 .