Team leaders' technology choice in virtual teams

Virtual teams face challenges arising from geographical distance, cultural differences, and differing modes of interaction. Team leaders in particular face these challenges because they are primarily responsible for efficient team management. Technology choices made by leaders have become a focus of interest in communication studies, but questions regarding media choice in virtual teams have not been widely studied. This article describes an in-depth, ethnographic exploration of Finnish virtual team leaders who work in natural teams in organizational contexts. The principal goal was to examine their choice of communication technologies in daily work. The results indicate that the choice was based on four factors. First, there are two factors that are person-related: ACCESSIBILITY and SOCIAL DISTANCE. Accessibility refers to people's ease of access through a particular medium, and social distance suggests that the technology selection is based on the social distance between the persons involved. Second, there are two task-related factors: idea sharing and informing. These factors describe team leaders' media selection by the nature of the task at hand. The findings suggest that team leaders' technology choice can be partly explained by traditional media selection theories, but in virtual contexts, accessibility becomes an important determinant of which technology is chosen.

[1]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Leadership Effectiveness in Global Virtual Teams , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Mahesh S. Raisinghani,et al.  An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[3]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Making sense of qualitative data , 1996 .

[4]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  An Investigation of Media Selection Among Directors and Managers: From "Self" to "Other" Orientation , 1998, MIS Q..

[5]  Norah E. Dunbar,et al.  Testing the Interactivity Principle: Effects of Mediation, Propinquity, and Verbal and Nonverbal Modalities in Interpersonal Interaction , 2002 .

[6]  Jane E. Henry,et al.  Tools for Virtual Teams: A Team Fitness Companion , 1998 .

[7]  Carmen Egido,et al.  Teleconferencing as a technology to support cooperative work: Its , 1990 .

[8]  Børge Obel,et al.  Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: The Dynamics of Fit , 2003 .

[9]  Hy Mariampolski,et al.  Varieties of Qualitative Research , 2001 .

[10]  R. Gephart The textual approach: Risk and blame in disaster sensemaking , 1993 .

[11]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  Training to improve virtual team communication , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[12]  Leslie A. Perlow,et al.  Who's helping whom? Layers of culture and workplace behavior , 2002 .

[13]  R. Daft,et al.  Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations , 1987 .

[14]  M. Hammersley,et al.  Ethnography and participant observation. , 1994 .

[15]  B DavisGordon,et al.  An investigation of media selection among directors and managers , 1998 .

[16]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration , 1990 .

[17]  C. Steinfield,et al.  A Social Information Processing Model of Media Use in Organizations , 1987 .

[18]  Benson Rosen,et al.  Virtual team effectiveness: a proposed research agenda , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[19]  C. Erik Timmerman,et al.  Communication technology use and multiple workplace identifications among organizational teleworkers with varied degrees of virtuality , 1999 .

[20]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[21]  H. Blumer,et al.  Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method , 1988 .

[22]  T. Abel,et al.  Mind, Self, and Society , 1934 .

[23]  Linda S. Lotto Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .

[24]  Ping Zhang,et al.  Fast timing estimation for CDMA waveforms in a near-far environment , 1996, Proceedings of GLOBECOM'96. 1996 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[25]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Team Boundary Issues Across Multiple Global Firms , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[26]  C. Steinfield,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Technology use , 1990 .

[27]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[28]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[29]  Charles Steinfield,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communications in Organizational Settings , 1992 .

[30]  R. Burton,et al.  Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design , 1995 .

[31]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  A Typology of Virtual Teams , 2002 .

[32]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies , 1996 .

[33]  R. Daft,et al.  Understanding Managers' Media Choices: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective , 1990 .

[34]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[35]  Matti Vartiainen,et al.  The use and usefulness of communication, collaboration and knowledge management tools in virtual organizations , 2003 .