Getting real about systematicity

[1]  Joan L. Bybee Cognitive Processes in Grammaticalization , 2014 .

[2]  Nathaniel J. Smith,et al.  The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic , 2013, Cognition.

[3]  Stefan L. Frank,et al.  Uncertainty Reduction as a Measure of Cognitive Load in Sentence Comprehension , 2013, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[4]  Robin L Thompson,et al.  Reading time data for evaluating broad-coverage models of English sentence processing , 2013, Behavior research methods.

[5]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  Word surprisal predicts N400 amplitude during reading , 2013, ACL.

[6]  Rens Bod,et al.  Empiricist Solutions to Nativist Puzzles by means of Unsupervised TSG , 2012 .

[7]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  Lexical surprisal as a general predictor of reading time , 2012, EACL.

[8]  Peter A. Jansen,et al.  Strong systematicity through sensorimotor conceptual grounding: an unsupervised, developmental approach to connectionist sentence processing , 2012, Connect. Sci..

[9]  Stefan Frank,et al.  Early effects of word surprisal on pupil size during reading , 2012, CogSci.

[10]  James A. Reggia,et al.  Systematically Grounding Language through Vision in a Deep, Recurrent Neural Network , 2011, AGI.

[11]  S. Frank,et al.  Insensitivity of the Human Sentence-Processing System to Hierarchical Structure , 2011, Psychological science.

[12]  John Hoeks,et al.  Modeling the Noun Phrase versus Sentence Coordination Ambiguity in Dutch: Evidence from Surprisal Theory , 2010, CMCL@ACL.

[13]  Franklin Chang,et al.  Syntactic Generalization in a Connectionist Model of Complex Sentence Production , 2009 .

[14]  I. Rooij,et al.  Connectionist semantic systematicity , 2009, Cognition.

[15]  N. Chater,et al.  Précis of Bayesian Rationality: The Probabilistic Approach to Human Reasoning , 2009, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[16]  Rens Bod,et al.  Children's Grammars Grow More Abstract with Age - Evidence from an Automatic Procedure for Identifying the Productive Units of Language , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[17]  Philemon Brakel,et al.  Strong systematicity in sentence processing by simple recurrent networks , 2009 .

[18]  Rens Bod,et al.  The hierarchical prediction network: Towards a neural theory of grammar acquisition , 2009 .

[19]  Frank Keller,et al.  Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity , 2008, Cognition.

[20]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Parsing costs as predictors of reading difficulty: An evaluation using the Potsdam Sentence Corpus , 2008, Journal of Eye Movement Research.

[21]  R. Levy Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.

[22]  Igor Farkas,et al.  Syntactic systematicity in sentence processing with a recurrent self-organizing network , 2008, Neurocomputing.

[23]  Stefan L. Frank,et al.  Generalization and systematicity in echo state networks , 2008 .

[24]  F.C.K. Wong,et al.  Generalisation towards Combinatorial Productivity in Language Acquisition by Simple Recurrent Networks , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Integration of Knowledge Intensive Multi-Agent Systems.

[25]  Roger Levy,et al.  Speakers optimize information density through syntactic reduction , 2006, NIPS.

[26]  Stefan L. Frank Strong Systematicity in Sentence Processing by an Echo State Network , 2006, ICANN.

[27]  Stefan L. Frank,et al.  Learn more by training less: systematicity in sentence processing by recurrent networks , 2006, Connect. Sci..

[28]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  Linear recursive distributed representations , 2005, Neural Networks.

[29]  J. Elman Distributed representations, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure , 1991, Machine Learning.

[30]  Mikael Bodén,et al.  Generalization by symbolic abstraction in cascaded recurrent networks , 2004, Neurocomputing.

[31]  Frank van der Velde,et al.  Lack of combinatorial productivity in language processing with simple recurrent networks , 2004, Connect. Sci..

[32]  Kenneth Aizawa,et al.  Exhibiting versus Explaining Systematicity: A Reply to Hadley and Hayward1 , 1997, Minds and Machines.

[33]  Dan Klein,et al.  Accurate Unlexicalized Parsing , 2003, ACL.

[34]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Book Reviews: Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing , 1999, CL.

[35]  Franklin Chang,et al.  Symbolically speaking: a connectionist model of sentence production , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[36]  John Hale,et al.  A Probabilistic Earley Parser as a Psycholinguistic Model , 2001, NAACL.

[37]  Brian Roark,et al.  Probabilistic Top-Down Parsing and Language Modeling , 2001, CL.

[38]  Dirk V. Arnold,et al.  Syntactic systematicity arising from semantic predictions in a Hebbian-competitive network , 2001, Connect. Sci..

[39]  Refractor Vision , 2000, The Lancet.

[40]  G. Marcus The Algebraic Mind: Integrating Connectionism and Cognitive Science , 2001 .

[41]  Steven Phillips,et al.  Constituent similarity and systematicity: The limits of first-order connectionism , 2000, Connect. Sci..

[42]  Nick Chater,et al.  Toward a connectionist model of recursion in human linguistic performance , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[43]  Steven Phillips,et al.  Are Feedforward and Recurrent Networks Systematic? Analysis and Implications for a Connectionist Cognitive Architecture , 1998, Connect. Sci..

[44]  Risto Miikkulainen,et al.  Subsymbolic Case-Role Analysis of Sentences With Embedded Clauses , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[45]  Robert F. Hadley Systematicity revisited : reply to Christiansen and Chater and Niklasson and van Gelder , 1994 .

[46]  Robert F. Hadley Systematicity in Connectionist Language Learning , 1994 .

[47]  T. Gelder,et al.  On Being Systematically Connectionist , 1994 .

[48]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Generalization and connectionist language learning , 1994 .

[49]  William Bechtel,et al.  The case for connectionism , 1993 .

[50]  J. Fodor,et al.  Connectionism and the problem of systematicity: Why Smolensky's solution doesn't work , 1990, Cognition.

[51]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[52]  Tim van Gelder,et al.  Compositionality: A Connectionist Variation on a Classical Theme , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[53]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Sentence comprehension: A parallel distributed processing approach , 1989, Language and Cognitive Processes.

[54]  J. Fodor,et al.  Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis , 1988, Cognition.

[55]  S. Pinker,et al.  On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition , 1988, Cognition.