Dictyostelium development shows a novel pattern of evolutionary conservation.

von Baer's law states that early stages of animal development are the most conserved. More recent evidence supports a modified "hourglass" pattern in which an early but somewhat later stage is most conserved. Both patterns have been explained by the relative complexity of either temporal or spatial interactions; the greatest conservation and lowest evolvability occur at the time of the most complex interactions, because these cause larger effects that are harder for selection to alter. This general kind of explanation might apply universally across independent multicellular systems, as supported by the recent finding of the hourglass pattern in plants. We use RNA-seq expression data from the development of the slime mold Dictyostelium to demonstrate that it does not follow either of the two canonical patterns but instead tends to show the strongest conservation and weakest evolvability late in development. We propose that this is consistent with a version of the spatial constraints model, modified for organisms that never achieve a high degree of developmental modularity.

[1]  G. Wray,et al.  Comparative embryology without a microscope: using genomic approaches to understand the evolution of development , 2009, Journal of biology.

[2]  Dave T. Gerrard,et al.  Gene expression divergence recapitulates the developmental hourglass model , 2010, Nature.

[3]  I. Grosse,et al.  A transcriptomic hourglass in plant embryogenesis , 2012, Nature.

[4]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  Toward a Molecular Understanding of Pleiotropy , 2006, Genetics.

[5]  Blaz Zupan,et al.  Conserved developmental transcriptomes in evolutionarily divergent species , 2010, Genome Biology.

[6]  D. Tautz,et al.  A phylogenetically based transcriptome age index mirrors ontogenetic divergence patterns , 2010, Nature.

[7]  C. Shaw,et al.  An orderly retreat: Dedifferentiation is a regulated process. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  D. Brutlag,et al.  Dynamic use of multiple parameter sets in sequence alignment , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[9]  Matthew W. Hahn,et al.  Comparative genomics of centrality and essentiality in three eukaryotic protein-interaction networks. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[10]  C. Wilke,et al.  Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[12]  W. Weis,et al.  An epithelial tissue in Dictyostelium challenges the traditional origin of metazoan multicellularity , 2012, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[13]  D. Graur,et al.  In search of the vertebrate phylotypic stage: a molecular examination of the developmental hourglass model and von Baer's third law. , 2005, Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution.

[14]  J. Gerhart,et al.  Cells, embryos, and evolution: toward a cellular and developmental understanding of phenotypic variation and evolutionary adaptability , 1997 .

[15]  C. W. Harper,et al.  Order in living organisms : a systems analysis of evolution , 1980 .

[16]  S. Otto,et al.  Two steps forward, one step back: the pleiotropic effects of favoured alleles , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Altruism and social cheating in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2000, Nature.

[18]  W. Arthur A theory of the evolution of development , 1988 .

[19]  L. Buss,et al.  The evolution of individuality , 1987 .

[20]  N. King,et al.  The unicellular ancestry of animal development. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[21]  J. Baldwin,et al.  Development and Evolution. , 1903 .

[22]  Ziheng Yang PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. , 2007, Molecular biology and evolution.

[23]  Erik L. L. Sonnhammer,et al.  InParanoid 7: new algorithms and tools for eukaryotic orthology analysis , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[24]  Kevin R Foster,et al.  High relatedness maintains multicellular cooperation in a social amoeba by controlling cheater mutants , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  W. Haerty,et al.  Ontogeny and phylogeny: molecular signatures of selection, constraint, and temporal pleiotropy in the development of Drosophila , 2009, BMC Biology.

[26]  G. Shaulsky,et al.  SDF-2 Induction of Terminal Differentiation in Dictyostelium discoideum Is Mediated by the Membrane-Spanning Sensor Kinase DhkA , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[27]  R. Kessin Dictyostelium: Evolution, Cell Biology, and the Development of Multicellularity , 2001 .

[28]  A. E. Hirsh,et al.  Functional genomic analysis of the rates of protein evolution. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Frietson Galis,et al.  Conservation of the segmented germband stage: robustness or pleiotropy? , 2002, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[30]  R. Nielsen Molecular signatures of natural selection. , 2005, Annual review of genetics.

[31]  William C. Wimsatt,et al.  Generative Entrenchment and Evolution , 1986, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[32]  C. Pál,et al.  Highly expressed genes in yeast evolve slowly. , 2001, Genetics.

[33]  D. Thieffry,et al.  Modularity in development and evolution. , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[34]  M. Wade,et al.  The Genetic Signature of Conditional Expression , 2010, Genetics.

[35]  Karl Ernst von Baer,et al.  Über Entwickelungsgeschichte der Thiere: Beobachtung und Reflexion , 1828 .

[36]  Naoki Irie,et al.  Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals vertebrate phylotypic period during organogenesis , 2011, Nature communications.

[37]  Doron Lancet,et al.  Genome-wide midrange transcription profiles reveal expression level relationships in human tissue specification , 2005, Bioinform..

[38]  Deborah G. Mayo,et al.  Philosophy of Science Association , 2008 .

[39]  S. Gould,et al.  Ontogeny and Phylogeny , 1978 .

[40]  H. A. Orr,et al.  ADAPTATION AND THE COST OF COMPLEXITY , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[41]  David L. Steffen,et al.  The genome of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2005, Nature.

[42]  R. Kay,et al.  A demonstration of pattern formation without positional information in Dictyostelium , 2004, Development, growth & differentiation.

[43]  E. Ostrowski,et al.  A NEGATIVE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MUTATION PLEIOTROPY AND FITNESS EFFECT IN YEAST , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[44]  C. Ouzounis,et al.  Genome-wide identification of genes likely to be involved in human genetic disease. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[45]  Nicholas H. Putnam,et al.  Comparative genomics of the social amoebae Dictyostelium discoideum and Dictyostelium purpureum , 2011, Genome Biology.

[46]  R. Raff Understanding Evolution: The Next Step. (Book Reviews: The Shape of Life. Genes, Development, and the Evolution of Animal Form.) , 1996 .

[47]  R. Grosberg,et al.  The Evolution of Multicellularity: A Minor Major Transition? , 2007 .

[48]  Claus O. Wilke,et al.  Mistranslation-Induced Protein Misfolding as a Dominant Constraint on Coding-Sequence Evolution , 2008, Cell.