Advances in modelling groundwater behaviour in Chalk catchments

Abstract Groundwater in Chalk catchments is a major resource that also helps support internationally important habitats and ecosystems. Its dual porosity and dual permeability properties, coupled with large-scale structural features (such as hard rock layers and marls), produce a highly complex hydrogeological system. Recent impacts from groundwater flooding as well as vulnerability to drought have raised questions over the ability of traditional approaches to model these aquifers. Current work on near-surface hydrological processes has highlighted the importance of the soil and weathered zone for controlling recharge rates. In addition, karst-like features, sedimentary deposits and valley bottom processes govern stream–aquifer interaction and present a challenge in their representation in any modelling system. Methods that have, and are being, developed to incorporate these features, and their use in modelling Chalk catchments, are described. These are required in order to address major challenges, such as groundwater flooding and drought impacts, both of which could become more frequent and intense as a result of climate change.

[1]  A. B. Taylor,et al.  Modelling the Vale of St Albans: parameter estimation and dual storage , 2012 .

[2]  G. Bryan,et al.  Modelling the hydrogeology and managed aquifer system of the Chalk across southern England , 2012 .

[3]  Recharge estimation methodologies employed by the Environment Agency of England and Wales for the purposes of regional groundwater resource modelling , 2012 .

[4]  N. Grigg.  Water for People and the Environment , 2011 .

[5]  A. Ireson,et al.  Flood risk from groundwater: examples from a Chalk catchment in southern England , 2011 .

[6]  Christopher R. Jackson,et al.  Simulation of the spatio‐temporal extent of groundwater flooding using statistical methods of hydrograph classification and lumped parameter models , 2011 .

[7]  Adrian P. Butler,et al.  Controls on preferential recharge to Chalk aquifers , 2011 .

[8]  J. Barker,et al.  Catchment scale tracer testing from karstic features in a porous limestone , 2010 .

[9]  Tim R. McVicar,et al.  Assessing the ability of potential evaporation formulations to capture the dynamics in evaporative demand within a changing climate , 2010 .

[10]  A. Gallagher,et al.  An early warning system for groundwater flooding in the Chalk , 2010 .

[11]  D. Allen,et al.  Interaction between groundwater, the hyporheic zone and a Chalk stream: a case study from the River Lambourn, UK , 2010 .

[12]  A. Gallagher,et al.  Analysis of flow processes in fractured chalk under pumped and ambient conditions (UK) , 2009 .

[13]  A. Ireson,et al.  A model for flow in the chalk unsaturated zone incorporating progressive weathering , 2009 .

[14]  A. Gallagher,et al.  Groundwater flooding in fractured permeable aquifers. , 2009 .

[15]  A. Ducharne,et al.  Multi-model comparison of a major flood in the groundwater-fed basin of the Somme River (France) , 2009 .

[16]  A. Parkes,et al.  Towards groundwater flood risk mapping , 2007, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology.

[17]  A. Binley,et al.  Characterising groundwater-dominated lowland catchments: the UK Lowland Catchment Research Programme (LOCAR) , 2007 .

[18]  G. Jenkins,et al.  The climate of the United Kingdom and recent trends , 2007 .

[19]  M. Price,et al.  Analysis of water-level response to rainfall and implications for recharge pathways in the Chalk aquifer, SE England , 2006 .

[20]  A. Butler,et al.  Characterising the vertical variations in hydraulic conductivity within the Chalk aquifer , 2006 .

[21]  H. Wheater,et al.  Transient simulations of flow and transport in the Chalk unsaturated zone , 2006 .

[22]  A. Ireson,et al.  Hydrological processes in the Chalk unsaturated zone - Insights from an intensive field monitoring programme , 2006 .

[23]  J. Barker,et al.  Karstic behaviour of groundwater in the English Chalk , 2006 .

[24]  S. Fletcher,et al.  Streamflow generation in the Pang and Lambourn catchments, Berkshire, UK , 2006 .

[25]  E. Blyth,et al.  Soil state and surface hydrology diagnosis based on MOSES in the Met Office Nimrod nowcasting system , 2006 .

[26]  K. Rushton,et al.  Improved soil moisture balance methodology for recharge estimation , 2006 .

[27]  M. Woods.  UK Chalk Group stratigraphy (Cenomanian – Santonian) determined from borehole geophysical logs , 2006, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology.

[28]  J. Roberts,et al.  The impact of broadleaved woodland on water resources in lowland UK: III. The results from Black Wood and Bridgets Farm compared with those from other woodland and grassland sites , 2005 .

[29]  Robert L. Wilby,et al.  Uncertainty in water resource model parameters used for climate change impact assessment , 2005 .

[30]  H. Wheater,et al.  The significance of flow in the matrix of the Chalk unsaturated zone , 2005 .

[31]  G. Petts,et al.  Dynamics of river–aquifer interactions along a chalk stream: the River Lambourn, UK , 2005 .

[32]  K. Rushton.  ESTIMATING RECHARGE FOR BRITISH AQUIFERS , 2005 .

[33]  J. Heathcote,et al.  Rainfall routing to runoff and recharge for regional groundwater resource models , 2004, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology.

[34]  J. A. Hudson,et al.  The spatial distribution of groundwater flooding in a chalk catchment in southern England , 2004 .

[35]  Christopher R. Jackson,et al.  User's manual for the groundwater flow model ZOOMQ3D , 2004 .

[36]  M. Wu,et al.  Principles of environmental physics , 2004, Plant Growth Regulation.

[37]  J. L. Pinault,et al.  La contribution des eaux souterraines aux crues exceptionnelles de la Somme en 2001 Observations, hypothèses, modélisation , 2003 .

[38]  K. R. Rushton,et al.  Groundwater Hydrology: Conceptual and Computational Models , 2003 .

[39]  A. MacDonald,et al.  Aquifer properties of the Chalk of England , 2001, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology.

[40]  S. Fletcher,et al.  Estimating recharge in UK catchments , 2001 .

[41]  R. Low,et al.  Mechanisms of water storage and flow in the unsaturated zone of the Chalk aquifer , 2000 .

[42]  Thomas C. Winter,et al.  Relation of streams, lakes, and wetlands to groundwater flow systems , 1999 .

[43]  Mahmood Nachabe,et al.  Refining the Definition of Field Capacity in the Literature , 1998 .

[44]  A. MacDonald,et al.  Evidence for rapid groundwater flow and karst-type behaviour in the Chalk of southern England , 1998, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[45]  R. Soley,et al.  Recharge through the drift: a study of contrasting Chalk catchments near Redgrave Fen, UK , 1998, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[46]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements , 1998 .

[47]  M. Hough,et al.  The United Kingdom Meteorological Office rainfall and evaporation calculation system; MORECS version 2.0; an overview , 1997 .

[48]  R. Ragab,et al.  Estimation of groundwater recharge to chalk and sandstone aquifers using simple soil models , 1997 .

[49]  Rory N. Mortimore,et al.  Lithostratigraphy for mapping the Chalk of southern England , 1997 .

[50]  Andrew McKenzie,et al.  The physical properties of major aquifers in England and Wales , 1997 .

[51]  J. Bloomfield.  Characterisation of hydrogeologically significant fracture distributions in the Chalk: an example from the Upper Chalk of southern England , 1996 .

[52]  P. Younger,et al.  Chalk fracture system characteristics: implications for flow and solute transport , 1995, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[53]  D. Banks,et al.  The Chalk as a karstic aquifer: evidence from a tracer test at Stanford Dingley, Berkshire, UK , 1995, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[54]  R. A. Downing.  Groundwater resources, their development and management in the UK: an historical perspective , 1993, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[55]  M. Price,et al.  A PUMPED DOUBLE-PACKER SYSTEM FOR USE IN AQUIFER EVALUATION AND GROUNDWATER SAMPLING. , 1993 .

[56]  B. Connorton,et al.  Estimation of the groundwater resources of the Berkshire Downs supported by mathematical modeling , 1989, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[57]  P. Younger.  Devensian periglacial influences on the development of spatially variable permeability in the Chalk of southeast England , 1989, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[58]  M. Price.  Fluid flow in the Chalk of England , 1987, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[59]  N. D. Robinson.  Lithostratigraphy of the chalk group of the north downs, southeast England , 1986 .

[60]  R. Mortimore.  Stratigraphy of the upper cretaceous white chalk of Sussex , 1986 .

[61]  S. Wellings.  Recharge of the Upper Chalk aquifer at a site in Hampshire, England: 1. Water balance and unsaturated flow , 1984 .

[62]  S. Wellings.  Recharge of the Upper Chalk aquifer at a site in Hampshire, England: 2. Solute movement , 1984 .

[63]  M. Field,et al.  The meteorological office rainfall and evaporation calculation system -- MORECS , 1983 .

[64]  Richard Harding,et al.  An objective assessment of soil-moisture deficit models , 1983 .

[65]  A Lumped Parameter Model of a Chalk Aquifer‐Stream System in Hampshire, United Kingdom , 1982 .

[66]  A. Robertson,et al.  A study of intergranular and fissure permeability in Chalk and Permian aquifers, using double-packer injection testing , 1982 .

[67]  D. B. Oakes,et al.  The Effects of Farming Practices on Groundwater Quality in the United Kingdom , 1981 .

[68]  J. Barker,et al.  A diffusion exchange model for solute movement in fissured porous rock , 1981, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[69]  S. R. Wellings,et al.  Movement of water and nitrate in the unsaturated zone of Upper Chalk near Winchester, Hants., England , 1980 .

[70]  E. Morel.  The use of a numerical model in the management of the Chalk aquifer in the Upper Thames Basin , 1980, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[71]  S. Foster,et al.  The interpretation of tritium in the Chalk unsaturated zone , 1980 .

[72]  M. Reeves.  Recharge and pollution of the english chalk: Some possible mechanisms , 1979 .

[73]  K. Rushton,et al.  The estimation of groundwater recharge , 1979 .

[74]  B. Greenfield,et al.  3. Hydrograph generation and augmented flow analysis , 1978 .

[75]  M. Owen,et al.  2. Characteristics and yield in fissured chalk , 1978 .

[76]  C. A. Hanson,et al.  4. Regional modelling - analogue and digital approaches , 1978 .

[77]  M. Reeves,et al.  A simple effective method for the computer simulation of groundwater storage and its application in the design of water resource systems , 1977 .

[78]  D. B. Oakes,et al.  Prediction of Future Nitrate Concentrations in Ground Watera , 1976 .

[79]  S. Foster.  The Chalk groundwater tritium anomaly — A possible explanation , 1975 .

[80]  H. Headworth.  The analysis of natural groundwater level fluctuations in the Chalk of Hampshire , 1972 .

[81]  D. Gray,et al.  The hydrogeological investigation of fissure-flow by borehole logging techniques , 1970, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[82]  H. L. Penman.  THE DEPENDENCE OF TRANSPIRATION ON WEATHER AND SOIL CONDITIONS , 1950 .

[83]  H. L. Penman.  Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.