Lower bounds on the size of general Schrödinger-cat states from experimental data

Experimental progress with meso- and macroscopic quantum states (i.e. general Schrodinger-cat states) was recently accompanied by theoretical proposals on how to measure the merit of these efforts. So far, experiment and theory have been disconnected as theoretical analysis of actual experimental data was missing. Here, we consider a proposal for macroscopic quantum states that measures the extent of quantum coherence present in the system. For this, the quantum Fisher information is used. We calculate lower bounds from real experimental data. The results are expressed as an 'effective size', that is, relative to 'classical' reference states. We find remarkable numbers of up to 70 in photonic and atomic systems.

[1]  Yvonne Y Gao,et al.  A Schrödinger cat living in two boxes , 2016, Science.

[2]  A. Shimizu,et al.  Stability of quantum states of finite macroscopic systems against classical noises, perturbations from environments, and local measurements. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[3]  Ueda,et al.  Squeezed spin states. , 1993, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[4]  N. Gisin,et al.  Two-mode squeezed state as Schrodinger-cat-like state , 2014, 1410.8421.

[5]  Karsten Danzmann,et al.  Detection of 15 dB Squeezed States of Light and their Application for the Absolute Calibration of Photoelectric Quantum Efficiency. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[6]  J. Delft,et al.  Measuring the size of a quantum superposition of many-body states , 2008 .

[7]  L. Pezzè,et al.  Witnessing entanglement without entanglement witness operators , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  W. Munro,et al.  A strict experimental test of macroscopic realism in a superconducting flux qubit , 2016, Nature Communications.

[9]  Pavel Sekatski,et al.  Detecting Large Quantum Fisher Information with Finite Measurement Precision. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[10]  M. Hotta,et al.  Quantum Estimation by Local Observables , 2004 .

[11]  N. Gisin,et al.  Size of quantum superpositions as measured with classical detectors , 2013, 1306.0843.

[12]  S. Barnett,et al.  Interferometry below the standard quantum limit with Bose-Einstein condensates. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[13]  Hyunseok Jeong,et al.  Quantification of macroscopic quantum superpositions within phase space. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[14]  Signatures for generalized macroscopic superpositions. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[15]  C. Simon,et al.  Precision requirements for observing macroscopic quantum effects , 2013 .

[16]  Timothy C. Ralph,et al.  Detecting the degree of macroscopic quantumness using an overlap measurement , 2014, 1404.7256.

[17]  S. Girvin,et al.  Deterministically Encoding Quantum Information Using 100-Photon Schrödinger Cat States , 2013, Science.

[18]  Géza Tóth,et al.  Detecting multiparticle entanglement of Dicke states. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[19]  Measurement-based measure of the size of macroscopic quantum superpositions , 2006, quant-ph/0611121.

[20]  Vlatko Vedral,et al.  General framework for quantum macroscopicity in terms of coherence , 2015, 1505.03792.

[21]  T. Monz,et al.  14-Qubit entanglement: creation and coherence. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[22]  Christine Silberhorn,et al.  Single-Mode Parametric-Down-Conversion States with 50 Photons as a Source for Mesoscopic Quantum Optics. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[23]  Anthony J Leggett,et al.  Macroscopic Quantum Systems and the Quantum Theory of Measurement (Progress in Statistical and Solid State Physics--In Commemoration of the Sixtieth Birthday of Ryogo Kubo) -- (Statistical Physics) , 1980 .

[24]  P. Zoller,et al.  Many-particle entanglement with Bose–Einstein condensates , 2000, Nature.

[25]  L. Pezzè,et al.  Loschmidt Echo for quantum metrology , 2016, 1604.04246.

[26]  Gregory S. Bentsen,et al.  Approaching the Heisenberg Limit without Single-Particle Detection. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[27]  A size criterion for macroscopic superposition states , 2003, quant-ph/0310193.

[28]  Wolfgang Dür,et al.  Measures of macroscopicity for quantum spin systems , 2012 .

[29]  Augusto Smerzi,et al.  Fisher information and entanglement of non-Gaussian spin states , 2014, Science.

[30]  L. Pezzè,et al.  Entanglement, nonlinear dynamics, and the heisenberg limit. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[31]  J. P. Home,et al.  Observation of Quantum Interference between Separated Mechanical Oscillator Wave Packets. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[32]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Tighter quantum uncertainty relations following from a general probabilistic bound , 2014, 1409.4440.

[33]  D. Leibfried,et al.  Toward Heisenberg-Limited Spectroscopy with Multiparticle Entangled States , 2004, Science.

[34]  U. Andersen,et al.  Assessments of macroscopicity for quantum optical states , 2014, 1405.5062.

[35]  S. Deleglise,et al.  Reconstruction of non-classical cavity field states with snapshots of their decoherence , 2008, Nature.

[36]  A. S. Kholevo.  A Generalization of the Rao–Cramer Inequality , 1974 .

[37]  Onur Hosten,et al.  Measurement noise 100 times lower than the quantum-projection limit using entangled atoms , 2016, Nature.

[38]  A. Smerzi,et al.  Phase-noise protection in quantum-enhanced differential interferometry , 2014, 1409.1703.

[39]  G. Tóth,et al.  Quantum metrology from a quantum information science perspective , 2014, 1405.4878.

[40]  Vitus Händchen,et al.  Stable control of 10 dB two-mode squeezed vacuum states of light. , 2013, Optics express.