Activity in Boolean networks

In this paper we extend the notion of activity for Boolean networks introduced by Shmulevich and Kauffman (Phys Rev Lett 93(4):48701:1–4, 2004). In contrast to existing theory, we take into account the actual graph structure of the Boolean network. The notion of activity measures the probability that a perturbation in an initial state produces a different successor state than that of the original unperturbed state. It captures the notion of sensitive dependence on initial conditions, and provides a way to rank vertices in terms of how they may impact predictions. We give basic results that aid in the computation of activity and apply this to Boolean networks with threshold functions and nor functions for elementary cellular automata, d-regular trees, square lattices, triangular lattices, and the Erdős–Renyi random graph model. We conclude with some open questions and thoughts on directions for future research related to activity, including long-term activity.

[1]  E. Goles,et al.  Neural and Automata Networks: Dynamical Behavior and Applications , 2011 .

[2]  Abhijin Adiga,et al.  Network Structure and Activity in Boolean Networks , 2015, Automata.

[3]  Matthew Macauley,et al.  Nested Canalyzing Depth and Network Stability , 2011, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[4]  Barbara Drossel,et al.  Perturbation propagation in random and evolved Boolean networks , 2009 .

[5]  Jamie X. Luo,et al.  Evolving Sensitivity Balances Boolean Networks , 2012, PloS one.

[6]  B. De Baets,et al.  Effect of asynchronous updating on the stability of cellular automata , 2012 .

[7]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  The impact of function perturbations in Boolean networks , 2007, Bioinform..

[8]  S. Kauffman,et al.  Activities and sensitivities in boolean network models. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[9]  L. Kadanoff,et al.  Boolean Dynamics with Random Couplings , 2002, nlin/0204062.

[10]  Fakhteh Ghanbarnejad,et al.  Impact of individual nodes in Boolean network dynamics , 2011, 1111.5334.

[11]  Jaakko Astola,et al.  The role of certain Post classes in Boolean network models of genetic networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  S. Kauffman,et al.  Noisy attractors and ergodic sets in models of gene regulatory networks. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  Christian M. Reidys,et al.  An Introduction to Sequential Dynamical Systems , 2007, Universitext.

[14]  Henning S. Mortveit,et al.  Attractor stability in nonuniform Boolean networks , 2014, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[15]  S. Kauffman Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  C. J. McGrath,et al.  Effect of exchange rate return on volatility spill-over across trading regions , 2012 .

[17]  S. Kauffman,et al.  On the dynamics of random Boolean networks subject to noise: attractors, ergodic sets and cell types. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  B. Derrida,et al.  Random networks of automata: a simple annealed approximation , 1986 .

[19]  E. Ott,et al.  The effect of network topology on the stability of discrete state models of genetic control , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[21]  Bernard De Baets,et al.  Phenomenological study of irregular cellular automata based on Lyapunov exponents and Jacobians. , 2010, Chaos.

[22]  François Robert,et al.  Discrete iterations - a metric study , 1986, Springer series in computational mathematics.

[23]  Abhijin Adiga,et al.  Sensitivity of Diffusion Dynamics to Network Uncertainty , 2013, AAAI.

[24]  Arantxa Etxeverria The Origins of Order , 1993 .

[25]  Jerrold E. Marsden,et al.  Perspectives and Problems in Nonlinear Science , 2003 .