Predictive value of baseline metabolic tumor burden on 18F-FDG PET/CT for brain metastases in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Objectives Brain metastases (BMs) are a major cause leading to the failure of treatment management for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of baseline metabolic tumor burden on 18F-FDG PET/CT measured with metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) for brain metastases (BMs) development in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after treatment. Methods Forty-seven patients with stage IIB-IIIC NSCLC who underwent baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations were retrospectively reviewed. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), MTV, and TLG of the primary tumor (SUVmaxT, MTVT, and TLGT), metastatic lymph nodes (SUVmaxN, MTVN, and TLGN), and whole-body tumors (SUVmaxWB, MTVWB, and TLGWB) were measured. The optimal cut-off values of PET parameters to predict brain metastasis-free survival were obtained using Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and the predictive value of clinical variables and PET parameters were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results The median follow-up duration was 25.0 months for surviving patients, and 13 patients (27.7%) developed BM. The optimal cut-off values were 21.1 mL and 150.0 g for MTVT and TLGT, 20.0, 10.9 mL and 55.6 g for SUVmaxN, MTVN and TLGN, and 27.9, 27.4 mL and 161.0 g for SUVmaxWB, MTVWB and TLGWB, respectively. In the Cox proportional hazards models, the risk of BM was significantly associated with MTVN and MTVWB or TLGN and TLGWB after adjusting for histological cell type, N stage, SUVmaxN, and SUVmaxWB. Conclusions Baseline metabolic tumor burden (MTV and TLG) evaluated from the level of metastatic lymph nodes and whole-body tumors are significant predictive factors for BM development in patients with locally advanced NSCLC.

[1]  S. Del Vecchio,et al.  PET-Based Volumetric Biomarkers for Risk Stratification of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients , 2021, Diagnostics.

[2]  D. Yalman,et al.  Can we define any marker associated with brain failure in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer? , 2021, Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique.

[3]  J Shang,et al.  A method for evaluation of patient-specific lean body mass from limited-coverage CT images and its application in PERCIST: comparison with predictive equation , 2020, EJNMMI Physics.

[4]  L. Xing,et al.  CT-based radiomics for predicting brain metastases as the first failure in patients with curatively resected locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. , 2020, European journal of radiology.

[5]  W. Feng,et al.  Risk factors of brain metastases as initial failure in completely resected stage IIIA(N2) non-small cell lung cancer , 2015, Annals of translational medicine.

[6]  T. Stinchcombe,et al.  Management of Brain Metastases in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2019, Journal of oncology practice.

[7]  S. Peters,et al.  Brain metastases , 2019, Nature Reviews Disease Primers.

[8]  J. Bussink,et al.  Development of symptomatic brain metastases after chemoradiotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: Does the type of chemotherapy regimen matter? , 2016, Lung cancer.

[9]  M. You,et al.  Brain metastasis in lung cancer: Building a molecular and systems-level understanding to improve outcomes. , 2016, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[10]  X. Ling,et al.  Comparison of RECIST, EORTC criteria and PERCIST for evaluation of early response to chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer , 2016, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[11]  Z. Ding,et al.  Phase I study of icotinib combined with whole brain radiotherapy for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases: neurocognitive and quality-of-life analysis. , 2016 .

[12]  S. Peters,et al.  The impact of brain metastasis on quality of life, resource utilization and survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2016, Cancer treatment reviews.

[13]  Hisao Asamura,et al.  The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for the Revision of the N Descriptors in the Forthcoming 8th Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer , 2015, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[14]  W. Oyen,et al.  PET in the management of locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC , 2015, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[15]  Francesco Petrella,et al.  Non-small-cell lung cancer , 2015, Nature Reviews Disease Primers.

[16]  Moon Soo Kim,et al.  A nomogram to predict brain metastasis as the first relapse in curatively resected non-small cell lung cancer patients. , 2015, Lung cancer.

[17]  Jun Liang,et al.  Risk factors for brain metastases in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer with definitive chest radiation. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  J. Sculier Nonsmall cell lung cancer , 2013, European Respiratory Review.

[19]  Joon Young Choi,et al.  Volume-based assessment by 18F-FDG PET/CT predicts survival in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[20]  M. Soussan,et al.  Prognostic implications of volume-based measurements on FDG PET/CT in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer after induction chemotherapy , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[21]  Jun Liang,et al.  Risk factors of brain metastases in completely resected pathological stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer , 2012, Radiation Oncology.

[22]  H. Choy,et al.  Phase III comparison of prophylactic cranial irradiation versus observation in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: primary analysis of radiation therapy oncology group study RTOG 0214. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  H. Choy,et al.  Phase III trial of prophylactic cranial irradiation compared with observation in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: neurocognitive and quality-of-life analysis. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  B. C. Penney,et al.  Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden on 18F-FDG PET in nonsurgical patients with non-small cell lung cancer , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[25]  Carol C Wu,et al.  Lung cancer staging essentials: the new TNM staging system and potential imaging pitfalls. , 2010, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[26]  D. Larson,et al.  Risk of cerebral metastases and neurological death after pathological complete response to neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced nonsmall‐cell lung cancer , 2007, Cancer.

[27]  Charles A Powell,et al.  Clinical predictors of metastatic disease to the brain from non-small cell lung carcinoma: primary tumor size, cell type, and lymph node metastases. , 2007, Radiology.

[28]  J. Crowley,et al.  Time from treatment to subsequent diagnosis of brain metastases in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective review by the Southwest Oncology Group. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  J. Dalphin,et al.  Multivariate analysis of factors predictive of brain metastases in localised non-small cell lung carcinoma. , 2004, Lung cancer.

[30]  A. Carretta,et al.  Brain metastases in locally advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma after multimodality treatment , 2002, Cancer.