Tailoring implementation strategies for evidence-based recommendations using computerised clinical decision support systems: protocol for the development of the GUIDES tools

BackgroundA computerised clinical decision support system (CCDSS) is a technology that uses patient-specific data to provide relevant medical knowledge at the point of care. It is considered to be an important quality improvement intervention, and the implementation of CCDSS is growing substantially. However, the significant investments do not consistently result in value for money due to content, context, system and implementation issues. The Guideline Implementation with Decision Support (GUIDES) project aims to improve the impact of CCDSS through optimised implementation based on high-quality evidence-based recommendations. To achieve this, we will develop tools that address the factors that determine successful CCDSS implementation.Methods/designWe will develop the GUIDES tools in four steps, using the methods and results of the Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases (TICD) project as a starting point: (1) a review of research evidence and frameworks on the determinants of implementing recommendations using CCDSS; (2) a synthesis of a comprehensive framework for the identified determinants; (3) the development of tools for use of the framework and (4) pilot testing the utility of the tools through the development of a tailored CCDSS intervention in Norway, Belgium and Finland. We selected the conservative management of knee osteoarthritis as a prototype condition for the pilot. During the process, the authors will collaborate with an international expert group to provide input and feedback on the tools.DiscussionThis project will provide guidance and tools on methods of identifying implementation determinants and selecting strategies to implement evidence-based recommendations through CCDSS. We will make the GUIDES tools available to CCDSS developers, implementers, researchers, funders, clinicians, managers, educators, and policymakers internationally. The tools and recommendations will be generic, which makes them scalable to a large spectrum of conditions. Ultimately, the better implementation of CCDSS may lead to better-informed decisions and improved care and patient outcomes for a wide range of conditions.Protocol registrationPROSPERO, CRD42016033738

[1]  L. Hartling,et al.  A protocol for a systematic review of the use of process evaluations in knowledge translation research , 2014, Systematic Reviews.

[2]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Clinical experts or methodologists to write clinical guidelines? , 2009, The Lancet.

[3]  Abdul V. Roudsari,et al.  Automation Bias - A Hidden Issue for Clinical Decision Support System Use , 2011, ITCH.

[4]  B. Fernando,et al.  A review of the empirical evidence of the value of structuring and coding of clinical information within electronic health records for direct patient care. , 2013, Informatics in primary care.

[5]  C. Quinn,et al.  WellDoc mobile diabetes management randomized controlled trial: change in clinical and behavioral outcomes and patient and physician satisfaction. , 2008, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[6]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  “Many miles to go …”: a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice , 2013, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[8]  Richard Baker,et al.  A checklist for identifying determinants of practice: A systematic review and synthesis of frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements in healthcare professional practice , 2013, Implementation Science.

[9]  L. Hayden,et al.  Ten Commandments for Effective Clinical Decision Support: Making the Practice of Evidence-based Medicine a Reality , 2011 .

[10]  Elizabeth V. Murphy.  Clinical Decision Support: Effectiveness in Improving Quality Processes and Clinical Outcomes and Factors That May Influence Success , 2014, The Yale journal of biology and medicine.

[11]  Thomas Agoritsas,et al.  Creating clinical practice guidelines we can trust, use, and share: a new era is imminent. , 2013, Chest.

[12]  Claire Glenton,et al.  Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[13]  K. Shojania,et al.  The effects of on-screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[14]  Dean F Sittig,et al.  Implementation pearls from a new guidebook on improving medication use and outcomes with clinical decision support. Effective CDS is essential for addressing healthcare performance improvement imperatives. , 2009, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.

[15]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: Methods of a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review , 2010, Implementation science : IS.

[16]  E Coiera,et al.  Section 1: Health and Clinical Mangement: The Safety and Quality of Decision Support Systems , 2006, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[17]  S. T. Rosenbloom,et al.  A Qualitative Analysis Evaluating The Purposes And Practices Of Clinical Documentation , 2014, Applied Clinical Informatics.

[18]  E. Coiera,et al.  The Changing Nature of Clinical Decision Support Systems: a Focus on Consumers, Genomics, Public Health and Decision Safety , 2009, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[19]  E. Balas,et al.  Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  R Brian Haynes,et al.  Features of effective computerised clinical decision support systems: meta-regression of 162 randomised trials , 2013, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  Nurettin Acir,et al.  Automatic detection of epileptiform events in EEG by a three-stage procedure based on artificial neural networks , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  L. Brosseau,et al.  A Systematic Critical Appraisal for Non-Pharmacological Management of Osteoarthritis Using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II Instrument , 2014, PloS one.

[23]  Sarah E. Rosenbaum,et al.  Developing and evaluating communication strategies to support informed decisions and practice based on evidence (DECIDE): protocol and preliminary results , 2013, Implementation Science.

[24]  S. Flottorp,et al.  Choice of treatment modalities was not influenced by pain, severity or co-morbidity in patients with knee osteoarthritis. , 2010, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.

[25]  Minna Kaila,et al.  What may help or hinder the implementation of computerized decision support systems (CDSSs): a focus group study with physicians. , 2008, Family practice.

[26]  Joan S. Ash,et al.  The unintended consequences of computerized provider order entry: Findings from a mixed methods exploration , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[27]  Joan S. Ash,et al.  Some Unintended Consequences of Clinical Decision Support Systems , 2007, AMIA.

[28]  Howard Balshem,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[29]  Casimir A. Kulikowski,et al.  The dangerous decade , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[30]  Rachel Churchill,et al.  ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[31]  Ida Sim,et al.  A taxonomic description of computer-based clinical decision support systems , 2006, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[32]  K. Hagen,et al.  Quality of hip and knee osteoarthritis management in primary health care in a Norwegian county: a cross-sectional survey , 2014, BMC Health Services Research.

[33]  I. Scott.  Ten clinician-driven strategies for maximising value of Australian health care. , 2014, Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association.

[34]  L. Moja,et al.  Effectiveness of computerized decision support systems linked to electronic health records: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2014, American journal of public health.

[35]  Claire Glenton,et al.  Still too little qualitative research to shed light on results from reviews of effectiveness trials: A case study of a Cochrane review on the use of lay health workers , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[36]  Ilkka Kunnamo,et al.  Clinical decision support must be useful, functional is not enough: a qualitative study of computer-based clinical decision support in primary care , 2012, BMC Health Services Research.

[37]  M. Eccles,et al.  Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice. , 2015, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[38]  Marjukka Mäkelä, Ilkka Kunnamo.  Implementing evidence in Finnish primary care. Use of electronic guidelines in daily practice , 2001, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[39]  Marc Berg,et al.  Review Paper: Overriding of Drug Safety Alerts in Computerized Physician Order Entry , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[40]  Anne Miller,et al.  Integrating computerized clinical decision support systems into clinical work: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research , 2015, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[41]  David F Lobach,et al.  The road to effective clinical decision support: are we there yet? , 2013, BMJ.

[42]  R. Watson.  European Union leads way on e-health, but obstacles remain , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[43]  Dean F. Sittig,et al.  Review of Reported Clinical Information System Adverse Events in US Food and Drug Administration Databases , 2011, Applied Clinical Informatics.

[44]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[45]  Gillian D Sanders,et al.  Enabling health care decisionmaking through clinical decision support and knowledge management. , 2012, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[46]  Günter Ollenschläger,et al.  Guidelines International Network: Toward International Standards for Clinical Practice Guidelines , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[47]  Adam Wright,et al.  Multiple perspectives on clinical decision support: a qualitative study of fifteen clinical and vendor organizations , 2015, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[48]  Bruce Guthrie,et al.  Process evaluations for cluster-randomised trials of complex interventions: a proposed framework for design and reporting , 2013, Trials.

[49]  Trudy van der Weijden,et al.  Decision aids that really promote shared decision making: the pace quickens , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[50]  A. Abu-Hanna,et al.  Assessing Quality of Care of Elderly Patients Using the ACOVE Quality Indicator Set: A Systematic Review , 2011, PloS one.

[51]  J. Jordan,et al.  A systematic review of recommendations and guidelines for the management of osteoarthritis: The chronic osteoarthritis management initiative of the U.S. bone and joint initiative. , 2014, Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism.

[52]  Adam Wright,et al.  Development and evaluation of a comprehensive clinical decision support taxonomy: comparison of front-end tools in commercial and internally developed electronic health record systems , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[53]  R. Fassett,et al.  Improving effectiveness of clinical medicine: the need for better translation of science into practice , 2013, The Medical journal of Australia.

[54]  Dirk Ramaekers,et al.  EBMPracticeNet: A Bilingual National Electronic Point-Of-Care Project for Retrieval of Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline Information and Decision Support , 2013, JMIR research protocols.

[55]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Tailored implementation for chronic diseases (TICD): A project protocol , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[56]  Johanna I. Westbrook,et al.  Section 1: Health and Clinical Mangement: The Safety and Quality of Decision Support Systems , 2006 .