Collaboration and Conflict in the Development of a Computerized Dispatch Facility

Recent research on the social and cultural aspects of systems development work has focused on the work of professional software and systems designers. A complementary approach is to look at the work of end users as systems developers, whose informal systems design work is frequently ignored or undervalued in organizations and by IS researchers. This case study, of an application to facilitate dispatch work in a large organization, describes a history of collaboration and conflict between IS professionals and end users as systems designers. Application development was initiated by end users, the initial programming was carried out by IS professionals in collaboration with end users, and the subsequent implementation and enhancement of the application was shared, and passed back and forth between end users and the organization’s IS department over a period of several years. We take a Social Construction of Technology approach to describing this history, examining the mixture of cooperation and conflict between the Dispatch and IS departments in terms of the differing interpretations of the application by the social groups involved in its history. A constructivist approach to studying systems design allows us to recognize the unique expertise end users bring to systems development work, and provides a useful means for describing the political aspects of systems design and implementation over an extended time period.

[1]  Les Gasser,et al.  The integration of computing and routine work , 1986, TOIS.

[2]  Thierry Bardini,et al.  The Social Construction of the Personal Computer User , 1995 .

[3]  S. Woolgar Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials , 1990 .

[4]  R. Lamb,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1996, Inf. Process. Manag..

[5]  Rob Kling,et al.  The Dynamics of Computerization in a Social Science Research Team: A Case Study of Infrastructure, Strategies, and Skills , 1991 .

[6]  Klaus Bruhn Jensen One person, one computer: the social construction of the personal computer , 1994 .

[7]  Richard Bentley,et al.  Medium versus mechanism: Supporting collaboration through customisation , 1995, ECSCW.

[8]  K. Grint Sisyphus and the social construction of computer user problems , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[9]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Twinkling Lights and Nested Loops: Distributed Problem Solving and Spreadsheet Development , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[10]  Barbara M. Wildemuth,et al.  End-user computing : the adoption of an intellectual technology in corporate settings , 1989 .

[11]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  Boundary Disputes: : Negotiating the Boundary between the Technical and the Social in the Development of IT Systems , 1994 .

[12]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[13]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  The Discursive Structure of the Social-Technical Divide: The Example of Information Systems Development , 1995 .

[14]  A. Clement,et al.  Work group knowledge requirements for desktop computing , 1990, Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[15]  Rob Kling,et al.  Learning in context: Extensively computerized work groups as communities-of-practice , 1995 .

[16]  J. Kimberly,et al.  The Dynamics of Organizational Development and Change: How the Past Shapes the Present and Constrains the Future , 1995 .

[17]  Martin Beirne,et al.  Participating informally: Opportunities and dilemmas in user-driven design , 1998, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[18]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Gardeners and gurus: patterns of cooperation among CAD users , 1992, CHI.

[19]  Pat Fung,et al.  Constructing the Networked Organization: Content and Context in the Development of Electronic Communications , 1995 .