Framework of systematic sustainability assessment strategy (FSSAS) for hydroelectric power industry in Malaysia

Hydroelectric power is an alternative power resource in Malaysia and always associated with negative impact on environmental, social and economy of the surrounding site. The dispute over environmental, societal and economic issues can be minimised if compliance to sustainability development requirement is included in the project as part of the project premises during planning phase. This paper suggests a framework targeted for decision-makers in charge of implementing the projects to produce hydropower the sustainable way in Malaysian context which can mitigate the risks in social, environment and economy. The framework is strategic in nature and based on project management methodology with objective to provide a 'common language' by having a project value as measureable for stakeholders to state their mutual agreement of what a sustainable hydropower project in the context of Malaysia and in line with the United Nations (UN) 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The paper discusses how the proposed systematic sustainability assessment strategy (FSSAS) framework support the call for Malaysia to promote meaningful public participation in ensuring land and natural resource decisions and to address citizens' interests which is the core idea of Environmental Democracy Index established in 2014. The paper argues that, even though it is at present impossible to define precision status of sustainability development with respect to the nature of the multi stakeholders and the lack of systematic assessment the proposed FSSAS framework can be a valuable tool because it tracks the project value as a quantitative deliverable to determine the status of the journey in sustainable development towards accomplishing the SDG under a consensus in hydropower industry of any scale over time.

[1]  Kartina Johan,et al.  The development of Sustainability Graduate Community (SGC) as a learning pathway for sustainability education - a framework for engineering programmes in Malaysia Technical Universities Network (MTUN) , 2016 .

[2]  Peter Guthrie,et al.  A framework for clarifying the meaning of Triple Bottom-Line, Integrated, and Sustainability Assessment , 2008 .

[3]  Wcd Dams and development: A new framework for decision-making , 2000 .

[4]  Kartina Johan,et al.  A new framework for sustainable hydropower development project , 2018 .

[5]  Yolanda Lechón,et al.  Assessing the three sustainability pillars through the Framework for Integrated Sustainability Assessment (FISA): Case study of a Solar Thermal Electricity project in Mexico , 2017 .

[6]  Yang Liu,et al.  Development of Quality Management Systems: How Have Disruptive Technological Innovations in Quality Management Affected Organizations? , 2013 .

[7]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  The evolution of a sustainability assessment strategy for Western Australia , 2003 .

[8]  Tick Hui Oh,et al.  Energy policy and alternative energy in Malaysia: Issues and challenges for sustainable growth , 2010 .

[9]  E. Andre,et al.  Beyond hydrology in the sustainability assessment of dams: A planners perspective – The Sarawak experience , 2012 .

[10]  Jiuping Xu,et al.  Integrated technological paradigm-based soft paths towards sustainable development of small hydropower , 2017 .

[11]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Conceptualising sustainability assessment , 2004 .

[12]  Dolf Gielen,et al.  Considering the energy, water and food nexus: Towards an integrated modelling approach , 2011 .

[13]  Nik Hisyamudin Muhd Nor,et al.  Development of Systematic Sustainability Assessment (SSA) for the Malaysian Industry , 2016 .

[14]  Parmita Saha,et al.  New hydropower development in Norway: Municipalities׳ attitude, involvement and perceived barriers , 2016 .

[15]  Haji Hassan Masjuki,et al.  A review on emissions and mitigation strategies for road transport in Malaysia , 2011 .

[16]  T. Mahlia,et al.  A review on energy scenario and sustainable energy in Malaysia , 2010 .