Hydrologic consistency as a basis for assessing complexity of monthly water balance models for the continental United States

Methods to select parsimonious and hydrologically consistent model structures are useful for evaluating dominance of hydrologic processes and representativeness of data. While information criteria (appropriately constrained to obey underlying statistical assumptions) can provide a basis for evaluating appropriate model complexity, it is not sufficient to rely upon the principle of maximum likelihood (ML) alone. We suggest that one must also call upon a “principle of hydrologic consistency,” meaning that selected ML structures and parameter estimates must be constrained (as well as possible) to reproduce desired hydrological characteristics of the processes under investigation. This argument is demonstrated in the context of evaluating the suitability of candidate model structures for lumped water balance modeling across the continental United States, using data from 307 snow-free catchments. The models are constrained to satisfy several tests of hydrologic consistency, a flow space transformation is used to ensure better consistency with underlying statistical assumptions, and information criteria are used to evaluate model complexity relative to the data. The results clearly demonstrate that the principle of consistency provides a sensible basis for guiding selection of model structures and indicate strong spatial persistence of certain model structures across the continental United States. Further work to untangle reasons for model structure predominance can help to relate conceptual model structures to physical characteristics of the catchments, facilitating the task of prediction in ungaged basins.

[1]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  Estimation of the ARNO model baseflow parameters using daily streamflow data , 1999 .

[2]  Chong-Yu Xu,et al.  Global water-balance modelling with WASMOD-M: Parameter estimation and regionalisation , 2007 .

[3]  A. Jakeman,et al.  How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall‐runoff model? , 1993 .

[4]  Thomas C Winter,et al.  Delineation and Evaluation of Hydrologic-Landscape Regions in the United States Using Geographic Information System Tools and Multivariate Statistical Analyses , 2004, Environmental management.

[5]  William M. Alley,et al.  On the Treatment of Evapotranspiration, Soil Moisture Accounting, and Aquifer Recharge in Monthly Water Balance Models , 1984 .

[6]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  A Review on Monthly Water Balance Models for Water Resources Investigations , 1998 .

[7]  Yuqiong Liu,et al.  Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation , 2008 .

[8]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Downward approach to hydrological prediction , 2003 .

[9]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  Model complexity control for hydrologic prediction , 2008 .

[10]  D. Seo,et al.  Overall distributed model intercomparison project results , 2004 .

[11]  C. Daly,et al.  A Statistical-Topographic Model for Mapping Climatological Precipitation over Mountainous Terrain , 1994 .

[12]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall‐runoff models , 1992 .

[13]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Stochastic parameter estimation procedures for hydrologie rainfall‐runoff models: Correlated and heteroscedastic error cases , 1980 .

[14]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Automatic calibration of a distributed catchment model , 2001 .

[15]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information , 1998 .

[16]  R. Mein,et al.  Sensitivity of optimized parameters in watershed models , 1978 .

[17]  Chong-Yu Xu,et al.  Parsimonious monthly rainfall-runoff models for humid basins with different input requirements , 1995 .

[18]  Chong-Yu Xu,et al.  Regional water balance modelling in the NOPEX area: development and application of monthly water balance models , 1996 .

[19]  C. Michel,et al.  A two-parameter monthly water balance model for French watersheds , 1994 .

[20]  Luis A. Bastidas,et al.  Complexity‐based robust hydrologic prediction , 2009 .

[21]  C. Perrin,et al.  Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation , 2003 .

[22]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  An efficient calibration method for continental‐scale land surface modeling , 2008 .

[23]  A. Shetty,et al.  A conceptual model of catchment water balance: 1. Formulation and calibration , 1995 .

[24]  Murari R. R. Varma,et al.  Water balance modelling in a tropical watershed under deciduous forest (Mule Hole, India): Regolith matric storage buffers the groundwater recharge process , 2010 .

[25]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[26]  Chong-Yu Xu,et al.  Methodology and comparative study of monthly water balance models in Belgium, China and Burma , 1992 .

[27]  W. Yeh,et al.  Parameter estimation in rainfall-runoff models , 1983 .

[28]  Srikanta Mishra,et al.  Model Averaging Techniques for Quantifying Conceptual Model Uncertainty , 2010, Ground water.

[29]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  Toward improved identification of hydrological models: A diagnostic evaluation of the “abcd” monthly water balance model for the conterminous United States , 2010 .

[30]  Keith Beven,et al.  Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology , 2001 .

[31]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  On model selection criteria in multimodel analysis , 2007 .

[32]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  A process‐based diagnostic approach to model evaluation: Application to the NWS distributed hydrologic model , 2008 .

[33]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  An interior algorithm for nonlinear optimization that combines line search and trust region steps , 2006, Math. Program..

[34]  G. Hornberger,et al.  Approach to the preliminary analysis of environmental systems , 1981 .

[35]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[36]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  Do Nash values have value? , 2007 .

[37]  Safouane Mouelhi,et al.  Stepwise development of a two-parameter monthly water balance model , 2006 .

[38]  Z. Samani,et al.  Estimating Potential Evapotranspiration , 1982 .

[39]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  A comparison of alternative multiobjective calibration strategies for hydrological modeling , 2007 .

[40]  Chong-Yu Xu,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Parameters and Residuals of a Conceptual Water Balance Model – Methodology and Case Study , 2001 .

[41]  V. Smakhtin Low flow hydrology: a review , 2001 .

[42]  H. S. Wheater,et al.  Calibration of the semi-distributed PDM rainfall-runoff model in the Upper Lee catchment, UK , 2010 .

[43]  Alan M. Lumb,et al.  Hydro-Climatic Data Network (HCDN) Streamflow Data Set, 1874-1988 , 1993 .

[44]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling , 2009 .

[45]  George Kuczera,et al.  Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 1. Theory , 2006 .

[46]  Rangasami L. Kashyap,et al.  Optimal Choice of AR and MA Parts in Autoregressive Moving Average Models , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[47]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Calibration of rainfall‐runoff models: Application of global optimization to the Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting Model , 1993 .

[48]  Ming Ye,et al.  Comment on “Inverse groundwater modeling for hydraulic conductivity estimation using Bayesian model averaging and variance window” by Frank T.‐C. Tsai and Xiaobao Li , 2010 .

[49]  R. Woods,et al.  Climate and landscape controls on water balance model complexity over changing timescales , 2002 .

[50]  Peter C. Young,et al.  Data-based mechanistic modelling and the rainfall-flow non-linearity. , 1994 .