Seismic assessment and loss estimation of existing school buildings in Italy

Abstract Extensive damage to school buildings has been observed during past earthquakes in Italy and there is a need to better understand their potential vulnerability. As part of a national project to assess seismic risk in Italian schools, a database was compiled in terms of characteristics such as school location and construction typology. This paper examines a number of these buildings considered to be a representative sample of the Italian school building population. To quantify their seismic vulnerability, the induced damage with respect to increased shaking intensity need to be quantified. This characterisation of the building vulnerability, in combination with the seismic hazard, allows more informed, risk-based decisions to be made using performance metrics such as expected annual loss (EAL). This article outlines a case study application quantifying the EAL and collapse safety for three school buildings representative of the Italian school building stock. Detailed numerical models were developed using information collected during in-situ inspections in order to accurately represent the dynamic response of the school structures. To estimate economic losses, a structural and non-structural element inventory was compiled using in-situ survey information. This case study application is conducted in a systematic fashion to clearly illustrate the various details required to implement more advanced seismic assessment studies. Finally, a comparison is made with the seismic classification guidelines recently introduced in Italy to provide further insight into how these can be used to identify existing buildings vulnerable to excessive damage and potential collapse during earthquakes.

[1]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Efficient Analytical Fragility Function Fitting Using Dynamic Structural Analysis , 2015 .

[2]  Maria Antonietta Aiello,et al.  Rapid visual screening for seismic evaluation of RC hospital buildings , 2015 .

[3]  R D Sharpe,et al.  THE SEISMIC RESPONSE OF INELASTIC STRUCTURES , 1974 .

[4]  Angelo Masi,et al.  Performance of non-structural elements in RC buildings during the L’Aquila, 2009 earthquake , 2011 .

[5]  Michael H. Scott,et al.  Plastic Hinge Integration Methods for Force-Based Beam¿Column Elements , 2006 .

[6]  Nicola Augenti,et al.  Learning from Construction Failures due to the 2009 L’Aquila, Italy, Earthquake , 2010 .

[7]  J. Bommer,et al.  PREDICTION OF HORIZONTAL RESPONSE SPECTRA IN EUROPE , 1996 .

[8]  Gennaro Magliulo,et al.  The Emilia Earthquake: Seismic Performance of Precast Reinforced Concrete Buildings , 2014 .

[9]  Sanja Hak,et al.  Damage Control for Clay Masonry Infills in the Design of RC Frame Structures , 2012 .

[10]  Donatello Cardone,et al.  Damage and Loss Assessment of Pre-70 RC Frame Buildings with FEMA P-58 , 2017 .

[11]  Serena Cattari,et al.  TREMURI program: An equivalent frame model for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings , 2013 .

[12]  T. Sullivan,et al.  Characterising the in-plane seismic performance of infill masonry , 2016 .

[13]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[14]  Donatello Cardone,et al.  Fragility curves and loss functions for RC structural components with smooth rebars , 2016 .

[15]  Gerard J. O'Reilly,et al.  Quantification of modelling uncertainty in existing Italian RC frames , 2018 .

[16]  Michael H. Scott,et al.  Nonlinear Finite-Element Analysis Software Architecture Using Object Composition , 2010, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[17]  Timothy J. Sullivan,et al.  Modeling Techniques for the Seismic Assessment of the Existing Italian RC Frame Structures , 2019 .

[18]  Gian Michele Calvi,et al.  Developing Direct Displacement-Based Procedures for Simplified Loss Assessment in Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering , 2014 .

[19]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  A Nonlinear Analysis Method for Performance-Based Seismic Design , 2000 .

[20]  Ricardo Monteiro,et al.  Seismic retrofit options for non-structural building partition walls: impact on loss estimation and cost-benefit analysis , 2018 .

[21]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines , 2002 .

[22]  Francesca da Porto,et al.  Performance of masonry buildings during the Emilia 2012 earthquake , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[23]  Khalid M. Mosalam,et al.  PEER Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology, Revisited , 2013 .

[24]  T. Paulay,et al.  Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings , 1992 .

[25]  Athol J. Carr,et al.  Analytical modelling of infilled frame structures , 2000 .

[26]  Donatello Cardone,et al.  Developing fragility curves and loss functions for masonry infill walls , 2015 .

[27]  Matjaž Dolšek,et al.  IM-based and EDP-based decision models for the verification of the seismic collapse safety of buildings , 2017 .

[28]  Paolo Ricci,et al.  6th April 2009 L’Aquila earthquake, Italy: reinforced concrete building performance , 2011 .

[29]  Mervyn J. Kowalsky,et al.  Displacement-based seismic design of structures , 2007 .

[30]  Gilberto Mosqueda,et al.  Performance of Nonstructural Components during the 27 February 2010 Chile Earthquake , 2012 .

[31]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  A Prioritization Scheme for Seismic Intervention in School Buildings in Italy , 2007 .

[32]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Modeling viscous damping in nonlinear response history analysis of buildings for earthquake excitation , 2016 .

[33]  Angelo Masi,et al.  VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF GRAVITY-LOAD DESIGNED RC BUILDINGS: EVALUATION OF SEISMIC CAPACITY THROUGH NON LINEAR DYNAMIC ANALYSES , 2012 .

[34]  M. Moratti,et al.  Studio della risposta di elementi non strutturali di edifici scolastici soggetti ad eventi sismici , 2015 .

[35]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Three Proposals for Characterizing MDOF Nonlinear Seismic Response , 1998 .

[36]  V. Silva,et al.  Assessment of earthquake damage considering the characteristics of past events in South America , 2017 .

[37]  Salih Yilmaz,et al.  Structural damages of L'Aquila (Italy) earthquake , 2010 .

[38]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Conditional Mean Spectrum: Tool for Ground-Motion Selection , 2011 .

[39]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data , 2003 .

[40]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  A Computationally Efficient Ground-Motion Selection Algorithm for Matching a Target Response Spectrum Mean and Variance , 2011 .

[41]  Stephanie E. Chang,et al.  Factors Influencing Post-Earthquake Decisions on Buildings in Christchurch, New Zealand , 2017 .

[42]  J. Baker,et al.  Correlation of Spectral Acceleration Values from NGA Ground Motion Models , 2008 .

[43]  Timothy J. Sullivan,et al.  Probabilistic seismic assessment and retrofit considerations for Italian RC frame buildings , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[44]  Katrin Beyer,et al.  Quasi-Static Cyclic Tests on Masonry Spandrels , 2012 .