Effects of Compatible versus Competing Rhythmic Grouping on Errors and Timing Variability in Speech

In typical speech words are grouped into prosodic constituents. This study investigates how such grouping interacts with segmental sequencing patterns in the production of repetitive word sequences. We experimentally manipulated grouping behavior using a rhythmic repetition task to elicit speech for perceptual and acoustic analysis to test the hypothesis that prosodic structure and patterns of segmental alternation can interact in the production planning process. Talkers produced alternating sequences of two words (top cop) and non-alternating controls (top top and cop cop), organized into six-word sequences. These sequences were further organized into prosodic groupings of three two-word pairs or two three-word triples by means of visual cues and audible metronome clicks. Results for six speakers showed more speech errors in triples, that is, when pairwise word alternation was mismatched with prosodic subgrouping in triples. This result suggests that the planning process for the segmental units of an utterance interacts with the planning process for the prosodic grouping of its words. It also highlights the importance of extending commonly used experimental speech elicitation methods to include more complex prosodic patterns, in order to evoke the kinds of interaction between prosodic structure and planning that occur in the production of lexical forms in continuous communicative speech.

[1]  Richard Wright,et al.  The phonetics of phonological speech errors: An acoustic analysis of slips of the tongue , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[2]  Mariapaola D'Imperio,et al.  Prosodic structure and tongue twister errors , 2010 .

[3]  Victoria A. Fromkin,et al.  The Non-Anomalous Nature of Anomalous Utterances , 1971 .

[4]  P. Keating,et al.  A Prosodic View of Word Form Encoding for Speech Production , 2002 .

[5]  R A Mowrey,et al.  Phonological primitives: electromyographic speech error evidence. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Dani Byrd,et al.  The elastic phrase: modeling the dynamics of boundary-adjacent lengthening , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[7]  Marianne Pouplier,et al.  Tongue Kinematics during Utterances Elicited with the SLIP Technique , 2007, Language and speech.

[8]  G. Dell,et al.  The sequential cuing effect in speech production , 1994, Cognition.

[9]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  A model for phase transitions in human hand movements during multifrequency tapping , 1996 .

[10]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words , 2007, J. Phonetics.

[11]  D. G. MacKay,et al.  Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue , 1975 .

[12]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[13]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  Glottalization of word-initial vowels as a function of prosodic structure , 1996 .

[14]  Carolyn E Wilshire,et al.  Serial order in phonological encoding: an exploration of the `word onset effect' using laboratory-induced errors , 1998, Cognition.

[15]  R. J. Weber,et al.  The parameter remapping effect in human performance: Evidence from tongue twisters and finger fumblers☆ , 1986 .

[16]  Kenneth N Stevens,et al.  Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Robert F. Port,et al.  Rhythmic constraints on stress timing in English , 1998 .

[18]  M. Tabain.  Effects of prosodic boundary on /aC/ sequences: acoustic results. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Catherine Phebe Browman,et al.  WPP, No. 42: Tip of the Tongue and Slip of the Ear: Implications for Language Processing , 1978 .

[20]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  A comparison of intra- and inter-syllabic coordination in repetitive speech of Taiwanese and English , 2011 .

[21]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Dynamic action units slip in speech production errors , 2007, Cognition.

[22]  F. Ferreira.  Prosody and performance in language production , 2007 .

[23]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[24]  P. Keating,et al.  Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Domain-initial articulatory strengthening in four languages , 2003 .

[26]  P. Boersma.  Praat : doing phonetics by computer (version 4.4.24) , 2006 .

[27]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Asymmetries in the perception of speech production errors , 2005, J. Phonetics.

[28]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Intragestural dynamics of multiple prosodic boundaries , 1998 .

[29]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Cascading activation from phonological planning to articulatory processes: Evidence from tongue twisters , 2006 .