Validated finite element models of the proximal femur using two-dimensional projected geometry and bone density

Two-dimensional finite element models of cadaveric femoral stiffness were developed to study their suitability as surrogates of bone stiffness and strength, using two-dimensional representations of femoral geometry and bone mineral density distributions. If successfully validated, such methods could be clinically applied to estimate patient bone stiffness and strength using simpler and less costly radiographs. Two-dimensional femur images were derived by projection of quantitative computed tomography scans of 22 human cadaveric femurs. The same femurs were fractured in a fall on the hip configuration. Femoral stiffness and fracture load were measured, and high speed video was recorded. Digital image correlation analysis was used to calculate the strain distribution from the high speed video recordings. Two-dimensional projection images were segmented and meshed with second-order triangular elements for finite element analysis. Elastic moduli of the finite elements were calculated based on the projected mineral density values inside the elements. The mapping of projection density values to elastic modulus was obtained using optimal parameter identification in a set of nine of the 22 specimens, and validated on the remaining 13 specimens. Finite element calculated proximal stiffness and strength correlated much better with experimental data than areal bone mineral density alone. In addition, finite element calculated strain distributions compared very well with strains obtained from digital image processing of the high speed video recordings, further validating the two-dimensional projected subject-specific finite element models.

[1]  Mitsugu Todo,et al.  Deformation analysis of the periodontium considering the viscoelasticity of the periodontal ligament. , 2009, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[2]  C. Cooper,et al.  Osteoporosis: trends in epidemiology, pathogenesis and treatment , 2006 .

[3]  T. Keller.  Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Gerard A Ateshian,et al.  Two-dimensional strain fields on the cross-section of the bovine humeral head under contact loading. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  G. Fuller,et al.  Falls in the elderly. , 2000, American family physician.

[6]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  W. C. Hayes,et al.  Effects of loading rate on strength of the proximal femur , 1994, Calcified Tissue International.

[8]  G. Lyritis,et al.  Rehabilitation after falls and fractures. , 2008, Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions.

[9]  Christian M. Langton,et al.  Comparison of 3D finite element analysis derived stiffness and BMD to determine the failure load of the excised proximal femur. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[10]  P. Cripton,et al.  During sideways falls proximal femur fractures initiate in the superolateral cortex: evidence from high-speed video of simulated fractures. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  A. Cappello,et al.  Risk of fracture in elderly patients: a new predictive index based on bone mineral density and finite element analysis. , 1999, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[12]  J. Keyak.  Improved prediction of proximal femoral fracture load using nonlinear finite element models. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[13]  S. P. Nielsen,et al.  The Fallacy of BMD: A Critical Review of the Diagnostic Use of Dual X-ray Absorptiometry , 2000, Clinical Rheumatology.

[14]  Thomas M Link,et al.  Advances in osteoporosis imaging. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[15]  S. Cummings,et al.  Heterogeneity of age-related fractures: implications for epidemiology. , 1987, Bone and mineral.

[16]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  Prediction of proximal femur strength using a CT-based nonlinear finite element method: differences in predicted fracture load and site with changing load and boundary conditions. , 2009, Bone.

[17]  S A Goldstein,et al.  The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Angelo Cappello,et al.  Automatic generation of accurate subject-specific bone finite element models to be used in clinical studies. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  J. Kanis,et al.  Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: Synopsis of a WHO report , 1994, Osteoporosis International.

[20]  H. Skinner,et al.  Correlations between orthogonal mechanical properties and density of trabecular bone: use of different densitometric measures. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[21]  S. Cummings,et al.  Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures , 2002, The Lancet.

[22]  S A Goldstein,et al.  Biomechanics of Fracture: Is Bone Mineral Density Sufficient to Assess Risk? , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[23]  T Yamamuro,et al.  Quantitative computed tomography: comparative study using different scanners with two calibration phantoms. , 1991, The British journal of radiology.