Exploring affective design for physical controls

Physical controls such as knobs, sliders, and buttons are experiencing a revival as many computing systems progress from personal computing architectures towards ubiquitous computing architectures. We demonstrate a process for measuring and comparing visceral emotional responses of a physical control to performance results of a target acquisition task. In our user study, participants experienced mechanical and rendered friction, inertia, and detent dynamics as they turned a haptic knob towards graphical targets of two different widths and amplitudes. Together, this process and user study provide novel affect- and performance-based design guidance to developers of physical controls for emerging ubiquitous computing environments. Our work bridges extensive human factors work in mechanical systems that peaked in the 1960's, to contemporary trends, with a goal of integrating mechatronic controls into emerging ubiquitous computing systems.

[1]  Mark Weiser The computer for the 21st century , 1991 .

[2]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  R. Krauss,et al.  Facial and autonomic manifestations of the dimensional structure of emotion , 1984 .

[4]  K. E. Novak,et al.  Kinematic properties of rapid hand movements in a knob turning task , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  G. A. Mendelsohn,et al.  Affect grid : A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal , 1989 .

[6]  Gitte Lindgaard,et al.  Integrating aesthetics within an evolutionary and psychological framework , 2004 .

[7]  Mark Weiser,et al.  The computer for the 21st Century , 1991, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[8]  Karon E. MacLean,et al.  Real time platform middleware for transparent prototyping of haptic applications , 2004, 12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2004. HAPTICS '04. Proceedings..

[9]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Touch a Screen or Turn a Knob: Choosing the Best Device for the Job , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[10]  James Edward Colgate,et al.  Passivity of a class of sampled-data systems: application to haptic interfaces , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 American Control Conference - ACC '94.

[11]  T B Sheridan,et al.  The “Feel” of Rotary Controls: Friction and Inertia1 , 1966, Human factors.

[12]  Karon E. MacLean,et al.  A case-study of affect measurement tools for physical user interface design , 2006, Graphics Interface.

[13]  Robert H. McKim,et al.  Human engineering guide to equipment design , 1963 .

[14]  P. Jordan Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors , 2000 .

[15]  H. Helson,et al.  Torque sensitivity as a function of knob radius and load. , 1967, The American journal of psychology.

[16]  Pieter Desmet,et al.  Measuring Emotion: Development and Application of an Instrument to Measure Emotional Responses to Products , 2005, Funology.

[17]  R. Sitgreaves Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[18]  J. Nunnally Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[19]  M. Noble,et al.  The effect of physical constants of a control on tracking performance. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  D. Karasic,et al.  Anxiety and anxiety disorders. , 1996, Focus.

[21]  D. Norman Emotional design : why we love (or hate) everyday things , 2004 .

[22]  K.E. MaClean,et al.  Smart tangible displays in the everyday world: a haptic door knob , 1999, 1999 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (Cat. No.99TH8399).

[23]  G. Klerman,et al.  Facial muscle patterning to affective imagery in depressed and nondepressed subjects , 1976, Science.

[24]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  System identification of the human hand grasping a haptic knob , 2002, Proceedings 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. HAPTICS 2002.

[25]  Jeff Rose,et al.  Rotating virtual objects with real handles , 1999, TCHI.