Supporting Complex Search Tasks

We present methods to automatically identify and recommend sub-tasks to help people explore and accomplish complex search tasks. Although Web searchers often exhibit directed search behaviors such as navigating to a particular Website or locating a particular item of information, many search scenarios involve more complex tasks such as learning about a new topic or planning a vacation. These tasks often involve multiple search queries and can span multiple sessions. Current search systems do not provide adequate support for tackling these tasks. Instead, they place most of the burden on the searcher for discovering which aspects of the task they should explore. Particularly challenging is the case when a searcher lacks the task knowledge necessary to decide which step to tackle next. In this paper, we propose methods to automatically mine search logs for tasks and build an association graph connecting multiple tasks together. We then leverage the task graph to assist new searchers in exploring new search topics or tackling multi-step search tasks. We demonstrate through experiments with human participants that we can discover related and interesting tasks to assist with complex search scenarios.

[1]  Michael Gamon,et al.  Mining Entity Types from Query Logs via User Intent Modeling , 2012, ACL.

[2]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Personalizing information retrieval for multi-session tasks: the roles of task stage and task type , 2010, SIGIR '10.

[3]  Francesco Bonchi,et al.  Do you want to take notes?: identifying research missions in Yahoo! search pad , 2010, WWW '10.

[4]  Enhong Chen,et al.  Towards context-aware search by learning a very large variable length hidden markov model from search logs , 2009, WWW '09.

[5]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Studying trailfinding algorithms for enhanced web search , 2010, SIGIR.

[6]  Jennifer Widom,et al.  Scaling personalized web search , 2003, WWW '03.

[7]  Dan Morris,et al.  SearchBar: a search-centric web history for task resumption and information re-finding , 2008, CHI.

[8]  Matthias Hagen,et al.  Query segmentation revisited , 2011, WWW.

[9]  Sean M. McNee,et al.  Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification , 2005, WWW '05.

[10]  Rosie Jones,et al.  Beyond the session timeout: automatic hierarchical segmentation of search topics in query logs , 2008, CIKM '08.

[11]  Nick Craswell,et al.  Random walks on the click graph , 2007, SIGIR.

[12]  Gerlof Bouma,et al.  Normalized (pointwise) mutual information in collocation extraction , 2009 .

[13]  Brendan T. O'Connor,et al.  TweetMotif: Exploratory Search and Topic Summarization for Twitter , 2010, ICWSM.

[14]  J. Friedman Special Invited Paper-Additive logistic regression: A statistical view of boosting , 2000 .

[15]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Task tours: helping users tackle complex search tasks , 2012, CIKM.

[16]  Ricardo A. Baeza-Yates,et al.  Query Recommendation Using Query Logs in Search Engines , 2004, EDBT Workshops.

[17]  Eugene Agichtein,et al.  Identifying "best bet" web search results by mining past user behavior , 2006, KDD '06.

[18]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Assessing the scenic route: measuring the value of search trails in web logs , 2010, SIGIR.

[19]  Ji-Rong Wen,et al.  WWW 2007 / Track: Search Session: Personalization A Largescale Evaluation and Analysis of Personalized Search Strategies ABSTRACT , 2022 .

[20]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Struggling or exploring?: disambiguating long search sessions , 2014, WSDM.

[21]  Qin Iris Wang,et al.  Learning Noun Phrase Query Segmentation , 2007, EMNLP.

[22]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Exploratory search , 2006, Commun. ACM.

[23]  Benjamin Rey,et al.  Generating query substitutions , 2006, WWW '06.

[24]  George Havas,et al.  An Optimal Algorithm for Generating Minimal Perfect Hash Functions , 1992, Inf. Process. Lett..

[25]  Michael Gamon,et al.  Active objects: actions for entity-centric search , 2012, WWW.

[26]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Predicting short-term interests using activity-based search context , 2010, CIKM.

[27]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  Web Watcher: A Tour Guide for the World Wide Web , 1997, IJCAI.

[28]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  Penguins in sweaters, or serendipitous entity search on user-generated content , 2013, CIKM.

[29]  Ahmed Hassan Awadallah,et al.  Identifying Web Search Query Reformulation using Concept based Matching , 2013, EMNLP.

[30]  Matthew Chalmers,et al.  The Order of Things: Activity-Centred Information Access, , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[31]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Footprints: history-rich tools for information foraging , 1999, CHI '99.

[32]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Mining the search trails of surfing crowds: identifying relevant websites from user activity , 2008, WWW.

[33]  Robert Villa,et al.  An aspectual interface for supporting complex search tasks , 2009, SIGIR.

[34]  Christopher Olston,et al.  ScentTrails: Integrating browsing and searching on the Web , 2003, TCHI.

[35]  Kenneth Ward Church,et al.  Query suggestion using hitting time , 2008, CIKM '08.

[36]  Francesco Bonchi,et al.  From machu_picchu to "rafting the urubamba river": anticipating information needs via the entity-query graph , 2013, WSDM '13.

[37]  Francesco Bonchi,et al.  Query suggestions using query-flow graphs , 2009, WSCD '09.

[38]  Paul N. Bennett,et al.  Toward whole-session relevance: exploring intrinsic diversity in web search , 2013, SIGIR.

[39]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm , 2009, Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm.

[40]  Jade Goldstein-Stewart,et al.  The use of MMR, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries , 1998, SIGIR '98.

[41]  M. de Rijke,et al.  A subjunctive exploratory search interface to support media studies researchers , 2012, SIGIR '12.

[42]  Andrei Broder,et al.  A taxonomy of web search , 2002, SIGF.

[43]  Fabrizio Silvestri,et al.  Efficient query recommendations in the long tail via center-piece subgraphs , 2012, SIGIR '12.

[44]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  From x-rays to silly putty via Uranus: serendipity and its role in web search , 2009, CHI.

[45]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Book Reviews: Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing , 1999, CL.