Long-term limb immobilization modulates inhibition-related electrophysiological brain activity

The effect of long-term immobilization on the motor system has been described during motor preparation, imagination or execution, when the movement has to be performed. But, what happens when the movement has to be suppressed? Does long-term limb immobilization modulate physiological responses underlying motor inhibition? Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded in healthy participants performing a Go/Nogo task, either with both hands free to respond (T1/T4: before/after the immobilization) or when left-hand movements were prevented by a cast (T2: as soon as the cast was positioned; T3: after one week of immobilization). In the right (control) side, N140, N2, and P3 components showed the expected greater amplitude in Nogo than in Go trials, irrespective of the timepoint. On the contrary, in the left (manipulated) side, each component of the ERP responses to Nogo trials showed specific differences across timepoints, suggesting that the inhibition-related EEG activity is significantly reduced by the presence of the cast and the duration of the immobilization. Furthermore, inhibition-related theta band activity to Nogo stimuli decreased at post-immobilization blocked session (T3-blocked). Altogether these findings can be interpreted as a consequence of plastic changes induced by immobilization, as also demonstrated by the cast-related corticospinal excitability modulation (investigated by using TMS) and by the decreased beta band in response to Go and Nogo trials. Thus, only if we are free to move, then inhibitory responses are fully implemented. After one week of immobilization, the amount of inhibition necessary to block the movement is lower and, consequently, inhibitory-related responses are reduced.

[1]  Koji Inui,et al.  Somato‐motor inhibitory processing in humans: a study with MEG and ERP , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[2]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  A neural microcircuit for cognitive conflict detection and signaling , 2014, Trends in Neurosciences.

[3]  E. Donchin,et al.  COGNITIVE PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY: THE ENDOGENOUS COMPONENTS OF THE ERP , 1978 .

[4]  S. Boniface,et al.  Magnetic brain stimulation with a double coil: the importance of coil orientation. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[6]  Christina F. Lavallee,et al.  Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: functional networks and cognitive contributions. , 2013, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[7]  F. Donders On the speed of mental processes. , 1969, Acta psychologica.

[8]  U. Ziemann,et al.  A practical guide to diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation: Report of an IFCN committee , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  Toshihiro Yanagihara,et al.  Four‐dimensional sonographic assessment of inter‐twin contact late in the first trimester , 2010, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[10]  J. Polich Updating P 300 : An Integrative Theory of P 3 a and P 3 b , 2009 .

[11]  Christian Beste,et al.  On the relevance of EEG resting theta activity for the neurophysiological dynamics underlying motor inhibitory control , 2019, Human brain mapping.

[12]  M. de Vega,et al.  Sentential Negation Might Share Neurophysiological Mechanisms with Action Inhibition. Evidence from Frontal Theta Rhythm , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  M. Jeannerod Neural Simulation of Action: A Unifying Mechanism for Motor Cognition , 2001, NeuroImage.

[14]  Hiroki Nakata,et al.  Temporal dynamics of neural activity in motor execution and inhibition processing , 2015, The European journal of neuroscience.

[15]  Laura Busse,et al.  Electrophysiological activity underlying inhibitory control processes in normal adults , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  J. Polich Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  P. Rossini,et al.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  Giulia Bucchioni,et al.  Empathy or Ownership? Evidence from Corticospinal Excitability during Pain Observation , 2016, J. Cogn. Neurosci..

[19]  R. McCarley,et al.  Button-pressing affects P300 amplitude and scalp topography , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  A. Berti,et al.  To Move or Not to Move? Functional Role of Ventral Premotor Cortex in Motor Monitoring During Limb Immobilization , 2018, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  Blake W. Johnson,et al.  Adaptive Motor Imagery: A Multimodal Study of Immobilization-Induced Brain Plasticity. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  Carlotta Fossataro,et al.  Suppressing movements with phantom limbs and existing limbs evokes comparable electrophysiological inhibitory responses , 2019, Cortex.

[23]  R. McCarley,et al.  The NoGo P300 ‘anteriorization’ effect and response inhibition , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[24]  Anthony M. Harris,et al.  Detecting Unattended Stimuli Depends on the Phase of Prestimulus Neural Oscillations , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Steven C. Sutherland,et al.  Optimal go/no-go ratios to maximize false alarms , 2018, Behavior research methods.

[26]  Jejo D. Koola,et al.  Motor threshold in transcranial magnetic stimulation: The impact of white matter fiber orientation and skull‐to‐cortex distance , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[27]  A. Berti,et al.  Movements and body ownership: Evidence from the rubber hand illusion after mechanical limb immobilization , 2017, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  A Mouraux,et al.  Across-trial averaging of event-related EEG responses and beyond. , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[29]  R. P. Madden,et al.  characteristics of , 2007 .

[30]  Dominique Morlet,et al.  MMN and Novelty P3 in Coma and Other Altered States of Consciousness: A Review , 2013, Brain Topography.

[31]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  Janette L. Smith,et al.  Conflict and inhibition in the cued-Go/NoGo task , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[33]  Jens Bo Nielsen,et al.  Central nervous adaptations following 1 wk of wrist and hand immobilization. , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.

[34]  J. T. Marsh,et al.  Probing the time-course of the auditory oddball P3 with secondary reaction time. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[35]  L. Fadiga,et al.  Training the Motor Cortex by Observing the Actions of Others During Immobilization , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  J. Ford,et al.  ERPs to response production and inhibition. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[37]  H. Bokura,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[38]  L. Jäncke,et al.  Effects of limb immobilization on brain plasticity , 2012, Neurology.

[39]  T. Pozzo,et al.  Shaping motor cortex plasticity through proprioception. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[40]  K. J. Bruin,et al.  Response priming in a go/nogo task: do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition? , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[41]  Carlotta Fossataro,et al.  Report of seizure induced by 10 Hz rTMS over M1 , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[42]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  Time-course of motor inhibition during hypnotic paralysis: EEG topographical and source analysis , 2013, Cortex.

[43]  Giulia Bucchioni,et al.  Anxiety-dependent modulation of motor responses to pain expectancy , 2018, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[44]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Sensorimotor Deprivation Induces Interdependent Changes in Excitability and Plasticity of the Human Hand Motor Cortex , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  B. Kotchoubey,et al.  Predicting coma and other low responsive patients outcome using event-related brain potentials: A meta-analysis , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[46]  R. Nigbur,et al.  Theta power as a marker for cognitive interference , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[47]  Gian Domenico Iannetti,et al.  Saliency Detection as a Reactive Process: Unexpected Sensory Events Evoke Corticomuscular Coupling , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[48]  G. Wittenberg,et al.  The neural basis of constraint-induced movement therapy , 2009, Current opinion in neurology.

[49]  Francesca Garbarini,et al.  Direct electrical stimulation of the premotor cortex shuts down awareness of voluntary actions , 2020, Nature Communications.

[50]  Francesca Garbarini,et al.  Executed and imagined bimanual movements: a study across different ages. , 2014, Developmental psychology.

[51]  W. Pritchard Psychophysiology of P300. , 1981, Psychological bulletin.

[52]  Koji Inui,et al.  The characteristics of the nogo-N140 component in somatosensory go/nogo tasks , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[53]  B. Rosén,et al.  Cerebral and clinical effects of short‐term hand immobilisation , 2011, The European journal of neuroscience.

[54]  Carlotta Fossataro,et al.  Inhibition or facilitation? Modulation of corticospinal excitability during motor imagery , 2018, Neuropsychologia.

[55]  G. Tononi,et al.  Arm immobilization causes cortical plastic changes and locally decreases sleep slow wave activity , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[56]  Robert J Barry,et al.  Brain dynamics in the auditory Go/NoGo task as a function of EEG frequency. , 2010, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[57]  Andreas Kastrup,et al.  The P300 in middle cerebral artery strokes or hemorrhages: Outcome predictions and source localization , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[58]  T. Demiralp,et al.  Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: Decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention , 2006, Brain Research.

[59]  D. Spinelli,et al.  Awareness affects motor planning for goal-oriented actions , 2012, Biological Psychology.

[60]  A. Kok Effects of degradation of visual stimuli on components of the event-related potential (ERP) in go/nogo reaction tasks , 1986, Biological Psychology.

[61]  Giulia Bucchioni,et al.  Empathy or Ownership? Evidence from Corticospinal Excitability Modulation during Pain Observation , 2016, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[62]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Late ERP components in visual and auditory Go/Nogo tasks. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[63]  Masato Yumoto,et al.  Mastication accelerates Go/No-go decisional processing: An event-related potential study , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[64]  S. Aglioti,et al.  Time-related changes of excitability of the human motor system contingent upon immobilisation of the ring and little fingers , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[65]  Edward M Bernat,et al.  Stimulus sequence context differentially modulates inhibition-related theta and delta band activity in a go/no-go task. , 2016, Psychophysiology.

[66]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[67]  C. Mercier,et al.  Influence of the amount of use on hand motor cortex representation: Effects of immobilization and motor training , 2012, Neuroscience.

[68]  Jan R. Wessel,et al.  Prepotent motor activity and inhibitory control demands in different variants of the go/no-go paradigm. , 2018, Psychophysiology.

[69]  Koji Inui,et al.  Higher anticipated force required a stronger inhibitory process in go/nogo tasks , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[70]  T. Pozzo,et al.  Use-Dependent Hemispheric Balance , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[71]  Carlotta Fossataro,et al.  Losing my hand. Body ownership attenuation after virtual lesion of the primary motor cortex , 2018, The European journal of neuroscience.

[72]  J. J. Moyle,et al.  Event-related potentials elicited during a visual Go-Nogo task in adults with phenylketonuria , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[73]  Carlotta Fossataro,et al.  The role of premotor and parietal cortex during monitoring of involuntary movement: A combined TMS and tDCS study , 2017, Cortex.

[74]  Alexander Sumich,et al.  Abnormal Centroparietal ERP Response in Predominantly Medication-Naive Adolescent Boys With ADHD During Both Response Inhibition and Execution , 2012, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[75]  S. Rossi,et al.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[76]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Probing the functional brain state during P300-evocation , 1992 .

[77]  Harm Veling,et al.  Go/no-go training affects frontal midline theta and mu oscillations to passively observed food stimuli , 2018, Neuropsychologia.

[78]  Alberto J. González-Villar,et al.  Functional Equivalence of Imagined vs. Real Performance of an Inhibitory Task: An EEG/ERP Study , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[79]  Fuminari Kaneko,et al.  Decreased cortical excitability during motor imagery after disuse of an upper limb in humans , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[80]  M. Hallett,et al.  Optimal Focal Transcranial Magnetic Activation of the Human Motor Cortex: Effects of Coil Orientation, Shape of the Induced Current Pulse, and Stimulus Intensity , 1992, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[81]  A. Fox,et al.  N2 and P3 modulation during partial inhibition in a modified go/nogo task. , 2016, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[82]  D. Friedman,et al.  The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[83]  M. Ridding,et al.  Short-term immobilization influences use-dependent cortical plasticity and fine motor performance , 2016, Neuroscience.

[84]  Carlotta Fossataro,et al.  Everything is Illuminated: Prismatic Adaptation Lowers Visual Detection Threshold in Normal Subjects , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[85]  C. Carter,et al.  The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: fMRI and ERP studies , 2002, Physiology & Behavior.

[86]  R. Barry,et al.  Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: The P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[87]  E. Bernat,et al.  Theta and delta band activity explain N2 and P3 ERP component activity in a go/no-go task , 2014, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[88]  S. Johnstone,et al.  Varying task difficulty in the Go/Nogo task: the effects of inhibitory control, arousal, and perceived effort on ERP components. , 2013, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[89]  Hiroki Nakata,et al.  Characteristics of No-go-P300 component during somatosensory Go/No-go paradigms , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[90]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[91]  M. R. Carvalho,et al.  Does immobilization of dependent hand promote adaptative changes in cerebral cortex? An analysis through qEEG asymmetry , 2013, Neuroscience Letters.

[92]  A. Nambu,et al.  No-go activity in the frontal association cortex of human subjects , 1993, Neuroscience Research.

[93]  Bruna Velasques,et al.  Cortical Reorganization after Hand Immobilization: The beta qEEG Spectral Coherence Evidences , 2013, PloS one.

[94]  睦子 佐々木,et al.  Four-dimensional sonographic assessment of inter-twin contact late in the first trimester , 2010 .