Mistaken Compassion: Tibetan Buddhist Perspectives on Neuroethics

Abstract For more than 20 years, Western science education has been incorporated into Tibetan Buddhist monastics’ training. In this time, there have been a number of fruitful collaborations between Buddhist monastics and neuroscientists, neurologists, and psychologists. These collaborations are unsurprising given the emphasis on phenomenological exploration of first-person conscious experience in Buddhist contemplative practice and the focus on the mind and consciousness in Buddhist theory. As such, Tibetan monastics may have underappreciated intuitions on the intersection of science, medicine, and ethics. Yet despite their overlapping interests, Buddhist perspectives are largely absent in contemporary neuroethical analysis, apart from conceptual arguments for their relevance. This article attempts to fill this gap by presenting the results of eleven semi-structured interviews with Tibetan Buddhist monastics in India on three issues in neuroethics: identity and authenticity, enhancement, and disorders of consciousness. The results of this empirical study reinforce the conclusions of theoretical work on Buddhism and neuroethics while also identifying future areas of inquiry, including the importance of community, the challenges in acting from compassion, and the value of self-directed mental cultivation.

[1]  J. T. Hashmi Medicine and Shariah: A Dialogue in Islamic Bioethics, edited by Aasim I. Padela , 2021, Journal of Islamic Ethics.

[2]  M. Rozier,et al.  There’s No Harm in Talking: Re-Establishing the Relationship Between Theological and Secular Bioethics , 2020, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[3]  E. Thompson Why I Am Not a Buddhist , 2020 .

[4]  W. Singer,et al.  Beyond the Self: Conversations between Buddhism and Neuroscience , 2017 .

[5]  M. Schermer,et al.  Moral Enhancement: Do Means Matter Morally? , 2015, Neuroethics.

[6]  J. Kalat Waking, Dreaming, Being. , 2015 .

[7]  James J. Hughes Using Neurotechnologies to Develop Virtues: A Buddhist Approach to Cognitive Enhancement , 2013, Accountability in research.

[8]  Karma Lekshe Tsomo Compassion, Ethics, and Neuroscience: Neuroethics Through Buddhist Eyes , 2012, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[9]  Francisca Cho,et al.  The Limits of the Buddhist Embrace of Science , 2012, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[10]  M. Peacock Why I Am Not A Buddhist , 2011 .

[11]  Andrew Fenton Buddhism and neuroethics: the ethics of pharmaceutical cognitive enhancement. , 2009, Developing world bioethics.

[12]  Charles Goodman Consequences of Compassion , 2009 .

[13]  R. Mizen The embodied mind. , 2009, The Journal of analytical psychology.

[14]  P. Luisi,et al.  Mind and Life: Discussions with the Dalai Lama on the Nature of Reality , 2008 .

[15]  Thomas Douglas Moral Enhancement , 2008, Journal of applied philosophy.

[16]  B. A. Wallace Contemplative Science: Where Buddhism and Neuroscience Converge , 2006 .

[17]  Sandra Harding,et al.  “Strong objectivity”: A response to the new objectivity question , 1995, Synthese.

[18]  L. Turner Bioethics and Religions: Religious Traditions and Understandings of Morality, Health, and Illness , 2003, Health Care Analysis.

[19]  N. Hoffart Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[20]  B. Lloyd,et al.  Ethics for the new millennium , 1997 .

[21]  Robert E Florida,et al.  Buddhism and Bioethics , 1996 .

[22]  Dalai Lama Xiv Bstan-ʾdzin-rgya-mtsho,et al.  Gentle Bridges: Conversations with the Dalai Lama on the Sciences of Mind , 1992 .

[23]  S. Harding Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology : What is « Strong Objectivity? » , 1992 .

[24]  K. Pike,et al.  Emics and Etics: The Insider/Outsider Debate , 1992 .