Interpreting dissociations between regular and irregular past-tense morphology: Evidence from event-related potentials

Neuropsychological dissociations between regular and irregular English past-tense morphology have been reported using a lexical decision task in which past-tense primes immediately precede present-tense targets. We present N400 event-related potential data from healthy participants using the same design. Both regular and irregular past-tense forms primed corresponding present-tense forms, but with a longer duration for irregular verbs. Phonological control conditions suggested that differences in formal overlap between prime and target contribute to, but do not account for, this difference, suggesting a link between irregular morphology and semantics. Further analysis dividing the irregular verbs into two categories (weak irregular and strong) revealed that priming for strong verbs was reliably stronger than that for weak irregular and regular verbs, which were statistically indistinguishable from one another. We argue that, although we observe a regular-irregular dissociation, the nature of this dissociation is more consistent with single- than with dual-system models of inflectional morphology.

[1]  S. Joordens,et al.  The long and short of semantic priming effects in lexical decision. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  F. Perrin,et al.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  Michael Ramscar.  The role of meaning in inflection: Why the past tense does not require a rule , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Deficits in phonology and past-tense morphology: What's the connection? , 2003 .

[5]  Richard Wiese,et al.  An ERP-study of German ‘irregular’ morphology , 2005, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[6]  M. Coltheart,et al.  358,534 nonwords: The ARC Nonword Database , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[7]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related potentials to violations of inflectional verb morphology in English. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[8]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: what does the evidence rule out? , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  Lothar M. Schmitt,et al.  An ER-fMRI investigation of morphological inflection in German reveals that the brain makes a distinction between regular and irregular forms , 2003, Brain and Language.

[10]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Phonology and neuropsychology of the English past tense , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Dissociations in Processing Past Tense Morphology: Neuropathology and Behavioral Studies , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  S. Becker,et al.  Long-term semantic priming: a computational account and empirical evidence. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  A. Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Morphological processing in early bilinguals: an ERP study of regular and irregular verb processing. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[14]  Michael C. Doyle,et al.  A comparison of the electrophysiological effects of formal and repetition priming. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[15]  A. Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Morphological Priming in Spanish Verb Forms: An ERP Repetition Priming Study , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Semantic Density and Past-Tense Formation in Three Germanic Languages , 2005 .

[17]  H. Heinze,et al.  Mental representations of morphologically complex words: an event-related potential study with adult humans , 1996, Neuroscience Letters.

[18]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Why No Mere Mortal Has Ever Flown Out to Center Field , 1991, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense , 1982 .

[20]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The basal ganglia and rule-governed language use: evidence from vascular and degenerative conditions. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Neural circuits subserving the retrieval of stems and grammatical features in regular and irregular verbs , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[22]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Dissociating types of mental computation , 1997, Nature.

[23]  S. Pinker,et al.  A Neural Dissociation within Language: Evidence that the Mental Dictionary Is Part of Declarative Memory, and that Grammatical Rules Are Processed by the Procedural System , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Deficits in irregular past-tense verb morphology associated with degraded semantic knowledge , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  Natalie Braber,et al.  The relationship between phonological and morphological deficits in Broca’s aphasia: Further evidence from errors in verb inflection , 2005, Brain and Language.

[26]  Peter Gordon,et al.  Facts, Events, and Inflection: When Language and Memory Dissociate , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  J. Connolly,et al.  Event-Related Potential Components Reflect Phonological and Semantic Processing of the Terminal Word of Spoken Sentences , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  G. Marcus.  The Algebraic Mind: Integrating Connectionism and Cognitive Science , 2001 .

[29]  Shlomo Bentin,et al.  The contributionof task-related factors to ERP repetition effects at short and long lags , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[30]  Roger W. Brown,et al.  A First Language: The Early Stages , 1974 .

[31]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: a connectionist model. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Neurophysiological Manifestations of Phonological Processing: Latency Variation of a Negative ERP Component Timelocked to Phonological Mismatch , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  M. Raijmakers.  Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. , 1997 .

[34]  M. Ullman.  Contributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model , 2004, Cognition.

[35]  Michele Miozzo,et al.  On the processing of regular and irregular forms of verbs and nouns: evidence from neuropsychology , 2003, Cognition.

[36]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[37]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition : Psychological and Biological Models , 1986 .

[39]  M. Kutas,et al.  Decomposition of morphologically complex words in English: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[40]  C. Fowler,et al.  Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[41]  V. L. Hanson,et al.  Morphophonology and Lexical Organization in Deaf Readers , 1985, Language and speech.

[42]  M. Rugg.  Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high-and low-frequency words , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[43]  J. Morton,et al.  The effects of priming with regularly and irregularly related words in auditory word recognition. , 1982, British journal of psychology.

[44]  D. Besner,et al.  Levels of representation in visual word recognition: a dissociation between morphological and semantic processing. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  D. Swinney,et al.  Neural correlates of lexicon and grammar: Evidence from the production, reading, and judgment of inflection in aphasia , 2005, Brain and Language.

[46]  H. Clahsen,et al.  Morphological priming in the German mental lexicon , 1999, Cognition.

[47]  M. Penke,et al.  How the brain processes complex words: an event-related potential study of German verb inflections. , 1997, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[48]  J. Elman,et al.  Learning and morphological change , 1995, Cognition.

[49]  M. Ullman.  A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[50]  R. F. Stanners,et al.  Memory representation for morphologically related words. , 1979 .

[51]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Abstract Grammatical Processing of Nouns and Verbs in Broca's Area: Evidence from FMRI , 2006, Cortex.

[52]  K. Plunkett,et al.  Stochastic approaches to understanding dissociations in inflectional morphology , 2006, Brain and Language.

[53]  R. Brown.  A First Language , 1973 .

[54]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Imaging the past: Neural activation in frontal and temporal regions during regular and irregular past-tense processing , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[55]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Brain responses to nouns, verbs and class-ambiguous words in context. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[56]  S. Pinker,et al.  The past and future of the past tense , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[57]  Frank Rösler,et al.  Differences between noun and verb processing in a minimal phrase context: a semantic priming study using event-related brain potentials. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[58]  Lorraine K. Tyler,et al.  Deficits for Semantics and the Irregular Past Tense: A Causal Relationship? , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[59]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On learning the past-tenses of English verbs: implicit rules or parallel distributed processing , 1986 .

[60]  R M Shiffrin,et al.  Episodic and lexical contributions to the repetition effect in word identification. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[61]  Diane Swick,et al.  Orthography Influences the Perception of Speech in Alexic Patients , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[62]  T. Münte,et al.  Human brain potentials to violations in morphologically complex Italian words , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[63]  M. Penke,et al.  Brain potentials indicate differences between regular and irregular German plurals , 1997, Neuroreport.

[64]  Billi Randall,et al.  Getting to the Meaning of the Regular Past Tense: Evidence from Neuropsychology , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[65]  A. Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Event-related brain responses to morphological violations in Catalan. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[66]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[67]  H. Jasper,et al.  The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[68]  M. Rugg,et al.  Modulation of event-related potentials by word repetition: the effects of inter-item lag. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[69]  James L. McClelland,et al.  What underlies the neuropsychological pattern of irregular>regular past-tense verb production? , 2005, Brain and Language.

[70]  H. Clahsen,et al.  Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[71]  J. Jaeger.  A POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHIC STUDY OF REGULAR AND IRREGULAR VERB MORPHOLOGY IN ENGLISH , 1996 .

[72]  S. Kuczaj.  The acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms , 1977 .

[73]  S. E. Napps,et al.  Morphemic relationships in the lexicon: Are they distinct from semantic and formal relationships? , 1989, Memory & cognition.