Monocular Movement Parallax and Near-Space Perception

Monocular perception of absolute distances in near space (<2 m) is discussed and studied experimentally. Stimulus change in time and sensory co-action (visual plus kinestethic) are in the theoretical analysis regarded as essential. Therefore movement parallax due to voluntary head movements has been introduced, in the experiments, as a hypothetical main cue, and perspective pattern transformation as a probably important side cue together with accommodation. (In ‘natural’ monocular perception these cues, in combination, are always available in near-space perception.) Under these experimental conditions all subjects exhibited approximately adequate (veridical) distance perception. This positive result, which diverges from the commonly accepted views about absolute-distance information, is tentatively regarded as an effect of the combination of cues and of methodological improvements introduced in the experiments. The result is taken as an indication of the fruitfulness of Gibson's conception of perceptual systems.

[1]  W. Metzger,et al.  Tiefenerscheinungen in optischen Bewegungsfeldern , 1935 .

[2]  G. Johansson.  PERCEPTION OF MOTION AND CHANGING FORM: A study of visual perception from continuous transformations of a solid angle of light at the eye , 1964 .

[3]  J. Hay,et al.  Position constancy and binocular convergence , 1969 .

[4]  Gunnar Johansson,et al.  Perceived rotary motion from changes in a straight line , 1968 .

[5]  J. Wallin.  The Influence of Accommodation and Convergence upon the Perception of Depth. , 1904 .

[6]  Sverre O. Lie.  Convergence as a cue to perceived size and distance , 1965 .

[7]  Hans Wallach,et al.  Adaptation in the constancy of visual direction measured by a one-trial method , 1969 .

[8]  K. Fieandt,et al.  THE PERCEPTION OF A VISUAL SHAPE AND OF ITS FRAME-SURFACE DURING CONTINUOUS TRANSFORMATION , 1961 .

[9]  J. Gibson,et al.  Motion parallax as a determinant of perceived depth. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  W. PEDDIE,et al.  Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics , 1926, Nature.

[11]  Hans Wallach,et al.  Target distance and adaptation in distance perception in the constancy of visual direction , 1972 .

[12]  Hans Wallach,et al.  On the relation of adaptation to field displacement during head movements to the constancy of visual direction , 1970 .

[13]  A. Ames.  Visual perception and the rotating trapezoidal window , 1951 .

[14]  G. Johansson,et al.  Visual Perception of Bending Motion , 1973, Perception.

[15]  Hans Wallach,et al.  The nature of adaptation in distance perception based on oculomotor cues , 1972 .

[16]  R T ZEGERS.  Monocular movement parallax thresholds as functions of field size, field position, and speed of stimulus movement. , 1948, The Journal of psychology.

[17]  W C GOGEL,et al.  Convergence as a cue to the perceived distance of objects in a binocular configuration. , 1961, Report. Army Medical Research Laboratory.

[18]  Gyorgy Kepes.  The Nature and Art of Motion , 1965 .

[19]  J. Gibson,et al.  Continuous perspective transformations and the perception of rigid motion. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  C. H. Graham,et al.  Factors influencing thresholds for monocular movement parallax. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  J. Gibson,et al.  Parallax and perspective during aircraft landings. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.

[22]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  Absolute motion parallax and the specific distance tendency , 1973 .

[23]  H. Wallach,et al.  Adaptation in distance perception based on oculomotor cues , 1972 .

[24]  J. Gibson,et al.  The sensitivity of the eye to two kinds of continuous transformation of a shadow-pattern. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  Hans Wallach,et al.  Differences in the dissipation of the effect of adaptation to two kinds of field displacement during head movements , 1972 .

[26]  W C GOGEL,et al.  Convergence as a cue to absolute distance. , 1961, Report. Army Medical Research Laboratory.

[27]  G. Johansson.  Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[28]  V. W. Grant,et al.  Accommodation and convergence in visual space perception. , 1942 .

[29]  J. Kravitz,et al.  The measurement of the constancy of visual direction and of its adaptation , 1965 .