Identifying and Measuring Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability.

BACKGROUND In active living research, measures used to characterize the built environment have been mostly gross qualities such as neighborhood density and park access. This project has developed operational definitions and measurement protocols for subtler urban design qualities believed to be related to walkability. METHODS Methods included: 1) recruiting an expert panel; 2) shooting video clips of streetscapes; 3) rating urban design qualities of streetscapes by the expert panel; 4) measuring physical features of streetscapes from the video clips; 5) testing inter-rater reliability of physical measurements and urban design quality ratings; 6) statistically analyzing relationships between physical features and urban design quality ratings, 7) selecting of qualities for operationalization, and 8) developing of operational definitions and measurement protocols for urban design qualities based on statistical relationships. RESULTS Operational definitions and measurement protocols were developed for five of nine urban design qualities: imageability, visual enclosure, human scale, transparency, and complexity. CONCLUSIONS A field survey instrument has been developed, tested in the field, and further refined for use in active living research.

[1]  J. Nasar.  The Effect of Sign Complexity and Coherence on the Perceived Quality of Retail Scenes , 1987 .

[2]  A E Stamps.  Measures of Architectural Mass: From Vague Impressions to Definite Design Features , 1998 .

[3]  Yuk Fai Cheong,et al.  HLM 6: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling , 2000 .

[4]  Kevin Lynch,et al.  The Image of the City , 1960 .

[5]  D. Appleyard,et al.  “Toward an Urban Design Manifesto” , 1987, The City Reader.

[6]  J. Jacobs.  The Death and Life of Great American Cities , 1962 .

[7]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Can the Physical Environment Determine Physical Activity Levels? , 2005, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[8]  S. Handy,et al.  Regional versus Local Accessibility: Variations in Suburban Form and the Effects on Non-Work Travel , 1992 .

[9]  Henry F. Arnold.  Trees in urban design , 1980 .

[10]  W. Grove.  Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed , 1981 .

[11]  T. R. Herzog,et al.  Searching for Legibility , 2003 .

[12]  W. Whyte.  City: Rediscovering the Center , 1988 .

[13]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[14]  Jan Gehl,et al.  Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space , 2003 .

[15]  Reid Ewing.  Asking Transit Users About Transit-Oriented Design , 2000 .

[16]  A E Stamps,et al.  Sex, Complexity, and Preferences for Residential Facades , 1999, Perceptual and motor skills.

[17]  Stephen W. Raudenbush,et al.  Turning Highways into Main Streets: Two Innovations in Planning Methodology , 2005 .

[18]  Ross C. Brownson,et al.  Reliability of 2 Instruments for Auditing the Environment for Physical Activity , 2004 .

[19]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Measuring Urban Design Qualities: An Illustrated Field Manual , 2005 .

[20]  Billie Giles-Corti,et al.  Developing a reliable audit instrument to measure the physical environment for physical activity. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[21]  A. Stamps.  Demographic Effects in Environmental Aesthetics: A Meta-Analysis , 1999 .

[22]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[23]  Jack L. Nasar,et al.  The evaluative image of the city , 1997 .

[24]  J. Sallis,et al.  Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[25]  R. Brownson,et al.  Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in the United States. , 2001, American journal of public health.

[26]  Kenneth R. Olwig,et al.  LIFE BETWEEN BUILDINGS: USING PUBLIC SPACE , 1989, Landscape Journal.

[27]  A. Bauman,et al.  Understanding environmental influences on walking; Review and research agenda. , 2004, American journal of preventive medicine.

[28]  Anne Vernez Moudon,et al.  Walking and Bicycling: An Evaluation of Environmental Audit Instruments , 2003, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[29]  Henry Sanoff,et al.  Visual Research Methods in Design , 1991 .

[30]  Richard Hedman,et al.  Fundamentals of Urban Design , 1985 .

[31]  R. Trancik,et al.  Finding Lost Space: Theories of Urban Design , 1986 .

[32]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Pedestrian- and Transit-Friendly Design , 1996 .

[33]  Gordon Cullen.  The Concise Townscape , 1971 .

[34]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective , 1989 .

[35]  J. Kay.  Asphalt Nation: How the Automobile Took Over America and How We Can Take It Back , 1997 .

[36]  Max Jacobson,et al.  A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction , 1981 .

[37]  B Pushkarev,et al.  Man-made America: Chaos or Control? , 1963 .

[38]  Arthur E. Stamps,et al.  Psychology and the Aesthetics of the Built Environment , 2000 .