Task Performance Under Deceptive Conditions: Using Military Scenarios in Deception Detection Research

The goal of this research was to investigate how changes in modality (communication type) and external conditioning (warnings of player deception) relate to perceptions of deception and task difficulty and, in turn, how these perceptions relate to the final group game scores in a cooperative effort with conflicting goals. One hundred and eight participants were grouped into teams of three, given similar instructions but different goals, and asked to play a cooperative game called StrikeCOM that simulates the intelligence gathering needed to develop an air tasking order and subsequent air strike on three military targets. The analysis of the post-game surveys showed support for participants in games using a face-to-face communication method to have lower perceptions of deception and task difficulty when compared to games using real-time plain text chat.

[1]  Ray Bull,et al.  Lay Persons' and Police Officers' Beliefs Regarding Deceptive Behaviour , 1996 .

[2]  D. Biros The effects of truth bias on artifact-user relationships : an investigation of factors for improving deception detection in artifact produced information , 1998 .

[3]  Ray Bull,et al.  Detecting true lies: police officers' ability to detect suspects' lies. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  Steven A. Mccornack Information manipulation theory , 1992 .

[5]  D. Over,et al.  Studies in the Way of Words. , 1989 .

[6]  Thomas Hugh Feeley,et al.  Global cue usage in behavioral lie detection , 1995 .

[7]  Joey F. George,et al.  Electronic Lies: Lying to Others and Detecting Lies Using Electronic Media , 1999 .

[8]  B. Clifford Detecting lies and deceit: the psychology of lying and the implications for professional practice , 2001 .

[9]  Timothy R. Levine,et al.  Linking Love and Lies: A Formal Test of the Mccornack and Parks Model of Deception Detection , 1992 .

[10]  Gün R. Semin,et al.  Lie experts' beliefs about nonverbal indicators of deception , 1996 .

[11]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Interpersonal Deception Theory , 1996 .

[12]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Inducing Sensitivity to Deception in Order to Improve Decision Making Performance: A Field Study , 2002, MIS Q..

[13]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronicity , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[14]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Opportunities for Strategic Information Manipulation through New Information Technology , 1990 .

[15]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Deception in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2004 .

[16]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Lying in everyday life. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Nathan J. Gordon,et al.  Effective Interviewing and Interrogation Techniques , 2001 .

[18]  Thomas Hugh Feeley,et al.  Humans as lie detectors: Some more second thoughts , 1998 .

[19]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  Deception Detection and Relationship Development: The Other Side of Trust , 1986 .

[20]  C. Edgley,et al.  Information control in conversations: Honesty is not always the best policy , 1975 .

[21]  A. Vrij,et al.  Telling and detecting lies in a high-stake situation: the case of a convicted murderer , 2001 .

[22]  N. Moray,et al.  Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[23]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[24]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .