Economic inclusivity through networked SME production : a case study in Kenya

As global manufacturing systems shift towards flexible and small-batch production, product developers and policy-makers have an opportunity to encourage more inclusive industrialization strategies. It is hypothesized that networks of informal-sector producers can provide an effective and ethical model for production; yet, due to a lack of research into these possibilities, both product developers and policy-makers are unaware of the latent potential. This thesis addresses the gap by analyzing a globally-competitive firm comprised of informal-sector producers, and making comparisons with other manufacturing models across both the developed and developing world. The author develops a categorization system for better understanding the costs and benefits of each model, and creates a framework to explain how new product developers evaluate key tradeoffs in making manufacturing decisions. The author then explores the prospect of creating a “virtual factory” of distributed microfactories through a case study of the ethical jewelry producer Soko in Nairobi, Kenya. Soko coordinates brass, horn, and bone jewelry production across 2500 craft microfactories, and its wares are cost-competitive with mid-tier jewelry brands in major retail stores worldwide. Soko’s overall effectiveness is analyzed through quantitative analysis of the company’s finances and impact reports, in-depth interviews with the company’s co-founder, and field research in Nairobi. The tradeoffs inherent in Soko’s production model are evaluated through the lens of the aforementioned decision-making framework. Key questions include, can artisanal microfactories compete with large-scale automation and industrialization? In what cases might smaller-scale production have an advantage over larger-scale models? Under the right circumstances, the case of Soko proves that networked microfactory production can be both cost-competitive (especially when handmade qualities are accentuated) and ethical; Soko creates opportunities for advancement across its network of artisans, who maintain ownership over their means of production. It is concluded that systems such as Soko’s can provide a model for socially-inclusive production strategies that build upon informal infrastructure. Even if Soko itself only impacts a small number of full-time artisans, a series of ethical, aggregating producers like Soko could collectively provide a larger-scale benefit.

[1]  S. Fox,et al.  A taxonomy of manufacturing distributions and their comparative relations to sustainability , 2018 .

[2]  Peter L. Singer,et al.  Advanced Manufacturing: The New American Innovation Policies , 2018 .

[3]  Erwin Rauch,et al.  Sustainable production in emerging markets through Distributed Manufacturing Systems (DMS) , 2016 .

[4]  Fiona Charnley,et al.  Distributed manufacturing: scope, challenges and opportunities , 2016 .

[5]  Ashley Hall,et al.  Makespaces: From Redistributed Manufacturing to a Circular Economy , 2016 .

[6]  Uwe Deichmann,et al.  World development report 2016: Digital dividends , 2016 .

[7]  蔡文川 評"The New Geography of Jobs" , 2015 .

[8]  Cindy Kohtala,et al.  Addressing sustainability in research on distributed production: an integrated literature review , 2015 .

[9]  Stijn M. J. van Osselaer,et al.  The Handmade Effect: What's Love Got to Do with It? , 2015 .

[10]  Stephen Fox,et al.  Third Wave Do-It-Yourself (DIY): Potential for prosumption, innovation, and entrepreneurship by local populations in regions without industrial manufacturing infrastructure , 2014 .

[11]  Anil Gurung,et al.  Makers: The New Industrial Revolution , 2014 .

[12]  Mu Li,et al.  Exploring the Chinese Gem and Jewelry Industry , 2014 .

[13]  R. Locke,et al.  Production in the innovation economy , 2014 .

[14]  K. McKague,et al.  Reducing Poverty by Employing Young Women: Hathay Bunano's Scalable Model for Rural Production in Bangladesh (Innovations Case Narrative: Hathay Bunano) , 2013, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization.

[15]  Fiona E. Murray,et al.  A Tale of Two Entrepreneurs: Understanding Differences in the Types of Entrepreneurship in the Economy , 2013 .

[16]  J. Ruggie Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights , 2013 .

[17]  R. Sisodia,et al.  Conscious Capitalism: Liberating the Heroic Spirit of Business , 2012 .

[18]  Jian Cao,et al.  Transforming the Landscape of Manufacturing: Distributed Manufacturing Based on Desktop Manufacturing (DM)2 , 2012 .

[19]  D. Kumah,et al.  Radiation-Related Eye Diseases among Welders of Suame ‘Magazine’ in the Kumasi Metropolis , 2011 .

[20]  Randolph Kirchain,et al.  Design for Location? The Impact of Manufacturing Offshore on Technology Competitiveness in the Optoelectronics Industry , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[21]  Frederic L. Pryor Capitalism and freedom , 2010 .

[22]  D. Vallero,et al.  The Sustainability Imperative , 2008 .

[23]  Kumiko Miyazaki,et al.  An empirical analysis of the valley of death: Large‐scale R&D project performance in a Japanese diversified company , 2006 .

[24]  Thomas R. Kurfess,et al.  International Assessment of Research and Development in Micromanufacturing , 2005 .

[25]  M. Mirata,et al.  Distributed economies - A new engine for innovation , 2005 .

[26]  Neil Gershenfeld,et al.  FAB: The Coming Revolution on Your Desktop--from Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication , 2005 .

[27]  Paul Andre Henri Francois Nieuwenhuis,et al.  Decentralization and Small-Scale Manufacturing: The Basis of Sustainable Regions? , 2004 .

[28]  T. Lancet Slavery today , 2003, The Lancet.

[29]  Rakesh Basant,et al.  Knowledge Flows and Industrial Clusters: An Analytical Review of Literature , 2002 .

[30]  Marylyn Carrigan,et al.  The myth of the ethical consumer – do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? , 2001 .

[31]  F. Fr,et al.  A Movement in the Making , 1997 .

[32]  M. Lazerson,et al.  A New Phoenix?: Modern Putting-Out in the Modena Knitwear Industry , 1995 .

[33]  W. Bodmer Principles of Scientific Management , 1993, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[34]  Michael Waldman,et al.  A New Perspective on Planned Obsolescence , 1993 .

[35]  L. Davis The Design of Jobs , 1966 .

[36]  J. Jewkes,et al.  Theory of Location of Industries. , 1933 .

[37]  A. Banerjee,et al.  Thinking Small: A Review of Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty , 2016 .

[38]  T. Janoski,et al.  Dominant Divisions of Labor: Models of Productions that have Transformed the World of Work , 2013 .

[39]  Ella Peinovich,et al.  Localized design-manufacture for Developing Countries : a methodology for creating culturally sustainable architecture , 2012 .

[40]  J. Harris Informality and Agglomeration Economies in Africa , 2012 .

[41]  Nicholas A. Ashford,et al.  Environmental Law, Policy, and Economics: Reclaiming the Environmental Agenda , 2008 .

[42]  Sara L. Beckman,et al.  Operations strategy : competing in the 21st century , 2008 .

[43]  Paul S. Adler,et al.  THE ‘LEARNING BUREAUCRACY’: NEW UNITED MOTOR MANUFACTURING, INC , 2005 .

[44]  Lauri Holappa,et al.  From megaplants to mini-mills - a trend in steelmaking - a prospect for papermaking , 2004 .

[45]  Renato J. Orsato,et al.  The Ecological Modernisation of the Automotive Industry , 2003 .

[46]  P. Hall,et al.  Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities , 2003 .

[47]  John Powell,et al.  The Survival of the Fitter: Lives of Some African Engineers , 1995 .

[48]  W. Diebold,et al.  The Second Industrial Divide , 1985 .

[49]  E. F. Schumacher Small Is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered , 1973 .

[50]  Friedrich Engels,et al.  The Marx-Engels Reader , 1972 .

[51]  N. Spulber,et al.  Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A Book of Essays , 1964 .

[52]  H. Barger The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money , 1936, Nature.